Literature DB >> 25035792

MR PROSTATE SEGMENTATION VIA DISTRIBUTED DISCRIMINATIVE DICTIONARY (DDD) LEARNING.

Yanrong Guo1, Yiqiang Zhan2, Yaozong Gao3, Jianguo Jiang1, Dinggang Shen3.   

Abstract

Segmenting prostate from MR images is important yet challenging. Due to non-Gaussian distribution of prostate appearances in MR images, the popular active appearance model (AAM) has its limited performance. Although the newly developed sparse dictionary learning method[1, 2] can model the image appearance in a non-parametric fashion, the learned dictionaries still lack the discriminative power between prostate and non-prostate tissues, which is critical for accurate prostate segmentation. In this paper, we propose to integrate deformable model with a novel learning scheme, namely the Distributed Discriminative Dictionary (DDD) learning, which can capture image appearance in a non-parametric and discriminative fashion. In particular, three strategies are designed to boost the tissue discriminative power of DDD. First, minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) feature selection is performed to constrain the dictionary learning in a discriminative feature space. Second, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is employed to assemble residuals from different dictionaries for optimal separation between prostate and non-prostate tissues. Third, instead of learning the global dictionaries, we learn a set of local dictionaries for the local regions (each with small appearance variations) along prostate boundary, thus achieving better tissue differentiation locally. In the application stage, DDDs will provide the appearance cues to robustly drive the deformable model onto the prostate boundary. Experiments on 50 MR prostate images show that our method can yield a Dice Ratio of 88% compared to the manual segmentations, and have 7% improvement over the conventional AAM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate segmentation; deformable segmentation; magnetic resonance image; sparse dictionary learning

Year:  2013        PMID: 25035792      PMCID: PMC4097123          DOI: 10.1109/ISBI.2013.6556613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging        ISSN: 1945-7928


  7 in total

1.  Towards robust and effective shape modeling: sparse shape composition.

Authors:  Shaoting Zhang; Yiqiang Zhan; Maneesh Dewan; Junzhou Huang; Dimitris N Metaxas; Xiang Sean Zhou
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Multifeature landmark-free active appearance models: application to prostate MRI segmentation.

Authors:  Robert Toth; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy.

Authors:  Hanchuan Peng; Fuhui Long; Chris Ding
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Deformable segmentation via sparse representation and dictionary learning.

Authors:  Shaoting Zhang; Yiqiang Zhan; Dimitris N Metaxas
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 5.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Steven A Leibel; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Robust face recognition via sparse representation.

Authors:  John Wright; Allen Y Yang; Arvind Ganesh; S Shankar Sastry; Yi Ma
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  Prostate segmentation by sparse representation based classification.

Authors:  Yaozong Gao; Shu Liao; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.506

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  A Learning Based Fiducial-driven Registration Scheme for Evaluating Laser Ablation Changes in Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Tao Wan; B Nicolas Bloch; Shabbar Danish; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 5.719

2.  Label image constrained multiatlas selection.

Authors:  Pingkun Yan; Yihui Cao; Yuan Yuan; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Cybern       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 11.448

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.