Literature DB >> 25035399

lrgpr: interactive linear mixed model analysis of genome-wide association studies with composite hypothesis testing and regression diagnostics in R.

Gabriel E Hoffman1, Jason G Mezey2, Eric E Schadt2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The linear mixed model is the state-of-the-art method to account for the confounding effects of kinship and population structure in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Current implementations test the effect of one or more genetic markers while including prespecified covariates such as sex. Here we develop an efficient implementation of the linear mixed model that allows composite hypothesis tests to consider genotype interactions with variables such as other genotypes, environment, sex or ancestry. Our R package, lrgpr, allows interactive model fitting and examination of regression diagnostics to facilitate exploratory data analysis in the context of the linear mixed model. By leveraging parallel and out-of-core computing for datasets too large to fit in main memory, lrgpr is applicable to large GWAS datasets and next-generation sequencing data.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: lrgpr is an R package available from lrgpr.r-forge.r-project.org.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25035399      PMCID: PMC4201153          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  10 in total

1.  Improved linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jennifer Listgarten; Christoph Lippert; Carl M Kadie; Robert I Davidson; Eleazar Eskin; David Heckerman
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Hyun Min Kang; Jae Hoon Sul; Susan K Service; Noah A Zaitlen; Sit-Yee Kong; Nelson B Freimer; Chiara Sabatti; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Christoph Lippert; Jennifer Listgarten; Ying Liu; Carl M Kadie; Robert I Davidson; David Heckerman
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Rapid variance components-based method for whole-genome association analysis.

Authors:  Gulnara R Svishcheva; Tatiana I Axenovich; Nadezhda M Belonogova; Cornelia M van Duijn; Yurii S Aulchenko
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  JAWAMix5: an out-of-core HDF5-based java implementation of whole-genome association studies using mixed models.

Authors:  Quan Long; Qingrun Zhang; Bjarni J Vilhjalmsson; Petar Forai; Ümit Seren; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  New approaches to population stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Noah A Zaitlen; David Reich; Nick Patterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Advantages and pitfalls in the application of mixed-model association methods.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Noah A Zaitlen; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies.

Authors:  Xiang Zhou; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Correcting for population structure and kinship using the linear mixed model: theory and extensions.

Authors:  Gabriel E Hoffman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A powerful and efficient set test for genetic markers that handles confounders.

Authors:  Jennifer Listgarten; Christoph Lippert; Eun Yong Kang; Jing Xiang; Carl M Kadie; David Heckerman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 6.937

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Polygenic risk scores for cigarettes smoked per day do not generalize to a Native American population.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Otto; Ian R Gizer; Chris Bizon; Kirk C Wilhelmsen; Cindy L Ehlers
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  An independent component analysis confounding factor correction framework for identifying broad impact expression quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Jin Hyun Ju; Sushila A Shenoy; Ronald G Crystal; Jason G Mezey
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Identifying novel associations in GWAS by hierarchical Bayesian latent variable detection of differentially misclassified phenotypes.

Authors:  Afrah Shafquat; Ronald G Crystal; Jason G Mezey
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.