Literature DB >> 25035103

Enhancement and reduction of associative retroactive cue interference by training in multiple contexts.

Gonzalo Miguez1, Mario A Laborda, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

Retroactive cue interference refers to situations in which a target cue X is paired with an outcome in phase 1 and a nontarget cue Z is paired with the same outcome in phase 2, with less subsequent responding to X being seen as a result of the phase 2 training. Two conditioned suppression experiments with rats were conducted to determine whether retroactive cue interference is similarly modulated by a manipulation that influences retroactive outcome interference (e.g., extinction). Both experiments used an ABC renewal-like design in which phase 1 training, phase 2 training, and testing each occurred in different contexts. Experiment 1 found that training the target association in multiple contexts without altering the number of training trials during phase 1 decreased retroactive cue interference (i.e., increased responding consistent with the target association). Experiment 2 found that training the interfering association in multiple contexts without altering the number of interference trials during phase 2 increased retroactive cue interference (i.e., decreased responding consistent with the target association). The possibility of similar mechanisms underlying cue interference and outcome interference is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25035103     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-014-0149-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.926


  26 in total

1.  Conditions favoring retroactive interference between antecedent events (cue competition) and between subsequent events (outcome competition).

Authors:  M Escobar; F Arcediano; R R Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Associative interference between cues and between outcomes presented together and presented apart: an integration.

Authors:  Ralph R. Miller; Martha Escobar
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  The repeated confrontation with videotapes of spiders in multiple contexts attenuates renewal of fear in spider-anxious students.

Authors:  Debora Vansteenwegen; Bram Vervliet; Carlos Iberico; Frank Baeyens; Omer Van den Bergh; Dirk Hermans
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2006-10-13

4.  Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events.

Authors:  Pedro L Cobos; Francisco J López; David Luque
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Interference between cues of the same outcome in a non-causally framed scenario.

Authors:  David Luque; Joaquín Morís; Pedro L Cobos; Francisco J López
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Spontaneous recovery from interference between cues but not from backward blocking.

Authors:  David Luque; Joaquín Morís; Pedro L Cobos
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Conducting exposure treatment in multiple contexts can prevent relapse.

Authors:  L M Gunther; J C Denniston; R R Miller
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1998-01

Review 8.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Conducting extinction in multiple contexts does not necessarily attenuate the renewal of shock expectancy in a fear-conditioning procedure with humans.

Authors:  David L Neumann; Ottmar V Lipp; Storm E Cory
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2006-04-17

10.  Extinction produces context inhibition and multiple-context extinction reduces response recovery in human predictive learning.

Authors:  Steven Glautier; Tito Elgueta; James Byron Nelson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.