Nancy Krieger1, Mathew V Kiang, Anna Kosheleva, Pamela D Waterman, Jarvis T Chen, Jason Beckfield. 1. Nancy Krieger, Mathew V. Kiang, Anna Kosheleva, Pamela D. Waterman, and Jarvis T. Chen are with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Jason Beckfield is with the Department of Sociology, Harvard University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We investigated 50-year US trends in age at menarche by socioeconomic position (SEP) and race/ethnicity because data are scant and contradictory. METHODS: We analyzed data by income and education for US-born non-Hispanic Black and White women aged 25 to 74 years in the National Health Examination Survey (NHES) I (1959-1962), National Health Examination and Nutrition Surveys (NHANES) I-III (1971-1994), and NHANES 1999-2008. RESULTS: In NHES I, average age at menarche among White women in the 20th (lowest) versus 80th (highest) income percentiles was 0.26 years higher (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.09, 0.61), but by NHANES 2005-2008 it had reversed and was -0.33 years lower (95% CI = -0.54, -0.11); no socioeconomic gradients occurred among Black women. The proportion with onset at younger than 11 years increased only among women with low SEP, among Blacks and Whites (P for trend < .05), and high rates of change occurred solely among Black women (all SEP strata) and low-income White women who underwent menarche before 1960. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in US age at menarche vary by SEP and race/ethnicity in ways that pose challenges to several leading clinical, public health, and social explanations for early age at menarche and that underscore why analyses must jointly include data on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position. Future research is needed to explain these trends.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated 50-year US trends in age at menarche by socioeconomic position (SEP) and race/ethnicity because data are scant and contradictory. METHODS: We analyzed data by income and education for US-born non-Hispanic Black and White women aged 25 to 74 years in the National Health Examination Survey (NHES) I (1959-1962), National Health Examination and Nutrition Surveys (NHANES) I-III (1971-1994), and NHANES 1999-2008. RESULTS: In NHES I, average age at menarche among White women in the 20th (lowest) versus 80th (highest) income percentiles was 0.26 years higher (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.09, 0.61), but by NHANES 2005-2008 it had reversed and was -0.33 years lower (95% CI = -0.54, -0.11); no socioeconomic gradients occurred among Black women. The proportion with onset at younger than 11 years increased only among women with low SEP, among Blacks and Whites (P for trend < .05), and high rates of change occurred solely among Black women (all SEP strata) and low-income White women who underwent menarche before 1960. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in US age at menarche vary by SEP and race/ethnicity in ways that pose challenges to several leading clinical, public health, and social explanations for early age at menarche and that underscore why analyses must jointly include data on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position. Future research is needed to explain these trends.
Authors: William Cameron Chumlea; Christine M Schubert; Alex F Roche; Howard E Kulin; Peter A Lee; John H Himes; Shumei S Sun Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: A Ernst; S L Kristensen; G Toft; A M Thulstrup; L B Håkonsen; S F Olsen; C H Ramlau-Hansen Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Ana Paula Abreu; Andrew Dauber; Delanie B Macedo; Sekoni D Noel; Vinicius N Brito; John C Gill; Priscilla Cukier; Iain R Thompson; Victor M Navarro; Priscila C Gagliardi; Tânia Rodrigues; Cristiane Kochi; Carlos Alberto Longui; Dominique Beckers; Francis de Zegher; Luciana R Montenegro; Berenice B Mendonca; Rona S Carroll; Joel N Hirschhorn; Ana Claudia Latronico; Ursula B Kaiser Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Susan Y Euling; Marcia E Herman-Giddens; Peter A Lee; Sherry G Selevan; Anders Juul; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Leo Dunkel; John H Himes; Grete Teilmann; Shanna H Swan Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Andrew G Rundle; Shakira F Suglia; Ezra S Susser; Pam Factor-Litvak; Dana March; Katrina L Kezios; Gina S Lovasi; Kim M Fader; Howard Andrews; Piera M Cirillo; Barbara A Cohn; Bruce G Link Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Shivani A Patel; Roopa Shivashankar; Mohammed K Ali; R M Anjana; M Deepa; Deksha Kapoor; Dimple Kondal; Garima Rautela; V Mohan; K M Venkat Narayan; M Masood Kadir; Zafar Fatmi; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Nikhil Tandon Journal: Glob Heart Date: 2016-03
Authors: Noel T Mueller; David R Jacobs; Richard F MacLehose; Ellen W Demerath; Scott P Kelly; Jill G Dreyfus; Mark A Pereira Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Katherine M Keyes; Dahsan Gary; Patrick M O'Malley; Ava Hamilton; John Schulenberg Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2019-03-30 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Juan G Ripoll; Winston Guo; Kylie J Andersen; Sarah E Baker; Chad C Wiggins; John R A Shepherd; Rickey E Carter; Brian T Welch; Michael J Joyner; Paolo B Dominelli Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 2.969
Authors: Robert A Hiatt; Susan L Stewart; Kristin S Hoeft; Lawrence H Kushi; Gayle C Windham; Frank M Biro; Susan M Pinney; Mary S Wolff; Susan L Teitelbaum; Dejana Braithwaite Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Frank M Biro; Ashley Pajak; Mary S Wolff; Susan M Pinney; Gayle C Windham; Maida P Galvez; Louise C Greenspan; Larry H Kushi; Susan L Teitelbaum Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 1.814
Authors: Aladdin H Shadyab; Caroline A Macera; Richard A Shaffer; Sonia Jain; Linda C Gallo; Margery L S Gass; Molly E Waring; Marcia L Stefanick; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: Menopause Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.953