Literature DB >> 32003484

Sex differences in paediatric airway anatomy.

Juan G Ripoll1, Winston Guo1, Kylie J Andersen1, Sarah E Baker1, Chad C Wiggins1, John R A Shepherd1, Rickey E Carter2, Brian T Welch3, Michael J Joyner1, Paolo B Dominelli4.   

Abstract

NEW
FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Are sex difference in the central airways present in healthy paediatric patients? What is the main finding and its importance? In patients ≤12 years we found no sex differences in central airway luminal area. After 14 years, the males had significantly larger central airway luminal areas than the females. The sex differences were minimized, but preserved when correcting for height. Luminal area is the main determinant of airway resistance and our finding could help explain sex differences in pulmonary system limitations to exercise in paediatric patients. ABSTRACT: Cross-sectional airway area is the main determinant of resistance to airflow in the respiratory system. In paediatric patients (<18 years), previous evidence for sex differences in cross-sectional airway area was limited to patients with history of pulmonary disease or cadaveric studies with small numbers of subjects. These studies either only report tracheal data and do not include a range of ages or correct for height. Therefore, we sought to assess sex differences in airway luminal area utilizing paediatric patients of varying ages and no history of respiratory disease. Using three-dimensional reconstructions from high-resolution computed tomography scans, we retrospectively assessed the cross-sectional airway area in healthy paediatric females (n = 97) and males (n = 128) over a range of ages (1-17 years). The areas of the trachea, left main bronchus, left upper lobe, left lower lobe, right main bronchus, intermediate bronchus and right upper lobe were measured at three discrete points by a blinded investigator. No differences between the sexes were noted in the cross-sectional areas of the youngest (ages 1-12 years) patients (P > 0.05). However, in patients ≥14 years the cross-sectional areas were larger in the males compared to females in most airway sites. For instance, the cross-sectional size of the trachea was 25% (218 ± 44 vs. 163 ± 24 mm2 , P < 0.01) larger in males vs. females among ages 13-17 years. When accounting for height, these sex differences in airway areas were attenuated, but persisted. Our results indicate that sex differences in paediatric airway cross-sectional area manifest after age ≥14 years and are independent of height.
© 2020 The Authors. Experimental Physiology © 2020 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway resistance; dysanapsis; exercise

Year:  2020        PMID: 32003484      PMCID: PMC7641092          DOI: 10.1113/EP088370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  32 in total

Review 1.  Gender differences in airway behaviour over the human life span.

Authors:  M R Becklake; F Kauffmann
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Bronchial dimensions and stature.

Authors:  W M Thurlbeck; J R Haines
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1975-07

3.  Airway size is related to sex but not lung size in normal adults.

Authors:  T R Martin; R G Castile; J J Fredberg; M E Wohl; J Mead
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1987-11

4.  Variability of maximum expiratory flow-volume curves.

Authors:  M Green; J Mead; J M Turner
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Dysanapsis and the resistive work of breathing during exercise in healthy men and women.

Authors:  Paolo B Dominelli; Yannick Molgat-Seon; Derek Bingham; Philippa M Swartz; Jeremy D Road; Glen E Foster; A William Sheel
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-09-10

6.  Sex differences in large conducting airway anatomy.

Authors:  Paolo B Dominelli; Juan G Ripoll; Troy J Cross; Sarah E Baker; Chad C Wiggins; Brian T Welch; Michael J Joyner
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-07-19

Review 7.  What does airway resistance tell us about lung function?

Authors:  David A Kaminsky
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.258

8.  Airway sizes and proportions in children quantified by a video-bronchoscopic technique.

Authors:  Ian B Masters; Robert S Ware; Paul V Zimmerman; Brian Lovell; Richard Wootton; Paul V Francis; Anne B Chang
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 3.317

9.  Effect of lung volume on airway luminal area assessed by computed tomography in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Kenta Kambara; Kaoruko Shimizu; Hironi Makita; Masaru Hasegawa; Katsura Nagai; Satoshi Konno; Masaharu Nishimura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sex differences in youth elite swimming.

Authors:  Jonathon W Senefeld; Andrew J Clayburn; Sarah E Baker; Rickey E Carter; Patrick W Johnson; Michael J Joyner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Is the healthy respiratory system built just right, overbuilt, or underbuilt to meet the demands imposed by exercise?

Authors:  Jerome A Dempsey; Andre La Gerche; James H Hull
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-08-13

2.  Minimizing airflow turbulence in women lowers the work of breathing to levels similar to men.

Authors:  Leah M Mann; Emily A Granger; Jason S Chan; Annie Yu; Yannick Molgat-Seon; Paolo B Dominelli
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 3.  Sex and Gender Differences in Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Sara P Dias; Matthijs C Brouwer; Diederik van de Beek
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Bronchopulmonary dysplasia patients have preserved CT-measured central airway luminal area.

Authors:  Winston L Guo; Ilhan M Eli; Juan G Ripoll; Sarah E Baker; John R A Shepherd; Chad C Wiggins; Brian T Welch; Michael J Joyner; Paolo B Dominelli
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.415

Review 5.  Evaluation of sex-based differences in airway size and the physiological implications.

Authors:  Leah M Mann; Sarah A Angus; Connor J Doherty; Paolo B Dominelli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  An integrative approach to the pulmonary physiology of exercise: when does biological sex matter?

Authors:  Bruno Archiza; Michael G Leahy; Shalaya Kipp; A William Sheel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.078

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.