Literature DB >> 25030813

Second-order motor planning in children: insights from a cup-manipulation-task.

Kathrin Wunsch1, Daniel J Weiss, Thomas Schack, Matthias Weigelt.   

Abstract

The present study examined the development of anticipatory motor planning in an object manipulation task that has been used to successfully demonstrate motor planning in non-human primates (Weiss et al. in Psychol Sci 18:1063-1068, 2007). Seventy-five participants from four different age groups participated in a cup-manipulation task. One group was preschool children (average age of 5.1 years), two groups were primary school children (7.7 and 9.8 years old respectively) and the final group was comprised of adults. The experimental task entailed reaching for a plastic cup that was vertically suspended in an apparatus in either upright or inverted orientation, removing the cup by its stem and then retrieving a small toy from the inside of the cup. When the cup was inverted in the apparatus, evidence for anticipatory motor planning could be achieved by initially gripping the stem using an inverted (thumb-down) grip posture. We found that when the cup was in upright orientation, all participants reached for the cup using an upright grip (i.e., thumb-up posture). However, when the cup was inverted in the apparatus, only adults consistently used an inverted grasping posture, though the percentage of inverted grips among participants did increase with age. These results suggest a protracted development for anticipatory motor planning abilities in children. Surprisingly, the performance of adults on this task more closely resembles the performance of several nonhuman primate species as opposed to children even at approximately 10 years of age. We discuss how morphological constraints on flexibility may help account for these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25030813      PMCID: PMC5596638          DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0596-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  20 in total

1.  Problem solving in infancy: the emergence of an action plan.

Authors:  M E McCarty; R K Clifton; R R Collard
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

3.  An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The development of end-state comfort planning in preschool children.

Authors:  Matthias Weigelt; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2010

5.  Developing motor planning over ages.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Thibaut; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2009-11-17

6.  Anticipatory action planning increases from 3 to 10 years of age in typically developing children.

Authors:  Marjolein Jongbloed-Pereboom; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Nicole Saraber-Schiphorst; Céline Crajé; Bert Steenbergen
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2012-09-29

7.  Learning to grasp efficiently: the development of motor planning and the role of observational learning.

Authors:  Bianca Jovanovic; Gudrun Schwarzer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: the end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Daniel J Weiss; Jason D Wark; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-12

9.  The end-state comfort effect in young children.

Authors:  Carola F Adalbjornsson; Mark G Fischman; Mary E Rudisill
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  The end-state comfort effect in 3- to 8-year-old children in two object manipulation tasks.

Authors:  Birgit Knudsen; Anne Henning; Kathrin Wunsch; Matthias Weigelt; Gisa Aschersleben
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-29
View more
  5 in total

1.  Developmental Differences in the Relationships Between Sensorimotor and Executive Functions.

Authors:  Chloe Gordon-Murer; Tino Stöckel; Michael Sera; Charmayne M L Hughes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  The influence of object size on second-order planning in an overturned cup task.

Authors:  Sara M Scharoun Benson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-04

3.  Modeling the Maturation of Grip Selection Planning and Action Representation: Insights from Typical and Atypical Motor Development.

Authors:  Ian Fuelscher; Jacqueline Williams; Kate Wilmut; Peter G Enticott; Christian Hyde
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-09

4.  A Three-Stage Model for the Acquisition of Anticipatory Planning Skills for Grip Selection during Object Manipulation in Young Children.

Authors:  Kathrin Wunsch; Matthias Weigelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-05

5.  No Interrelation of Motor Planning and Executive Functions across Young Ages.

Authors:  Kathrin Wunsch; Roland Pfister; Anne Henning; Gisa Aschersleben; Matthias Weigelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.