Literature DB >> 25029598

0.1 kilopascal difference for mechanophenotyping: soft matrix precisely regulates cellular architecture for invasion.

Zhizhan Gu1.   

Abstract

Current knowledge understands the mesenchymal cell invasion in a 3D matrix as a combined process of cell-to-matrix adhesion based cell migration and matrix remodeling. Excluding cell invasion stimulated by cytokines and chemokines, the basal cell invasion itself is a complicated process that can be regulated by matrix ligand type, density, geometry, and stiffness, etc. Understanding such a complicated biological process requires delicate dissections into simplified model studies by altering only one or two elements at a time. Past cell motility studies focusing on matrix stiffness have revealed that a stiffer matrix promotes 2D X-Y axis lateral cell motility. Here, we comment on two recent studies that report, instead of stiffer matrix, a softer matrix promotes matrix proteolysis and the formation of invadosome-like protrusions (ILPs) along the 3D Z axis. These studies also reveal that soft matrix precisely regulates such ILPs formation in the stiffness scale range of 0.1 kilopascal in normal cells. In contrast, malignant cells such as cancer cells can form ILPs in response to a much wider range of matrix stiffness. Further, different cancer cells respond to their own favorable range of matrix stiffness to spontaneously form ILPs. Thus, we hereby propose the idea of utilizing the matrix stiffness to precisely regulate ILP formation as a mechanophenotyping tool for cancer metastasis prediction and pathological diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer metastasis; cell invasion; cell migration; cellular architecture; invadopodia; invadosomes; matrix stiffness; mechanophenotyping; podosomes; soft matrix

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25029598      PMCID: PMC4201601          DOI: 10.4161/bioa.29175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioarchitecture        ISSN: 1949-0992


  25 in total

Review 1.  Foot and mouth: podosomes, invadopodia and circular dorsal ruffles.

Authors:  Roberto Buccione; James D Orth; Mark A McNiven
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis.

Authors:  Muhammad H Zaman; Linda M Trapani; Alisha L Sieminski; Alisha Siemeski; Drew Mackellar; Haiyan Gong; Roger D Kamm; Alan Wells; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Paul Matsudaira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Preparation of a micropatterned rigid-soft composite substrate for probing cellular rigidity sensing.

Authors:  Stephanie Wong; Wei-hui Guo; Ian Hoffecker; Yu-li Wang
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 5.  Preclinical intravital microscopy of the tumour-stroma interface: invasion, metastasis, and therapy response.

Authors:  Stephanie Alexander; Bettina Weigelin; Frank Winkler; Peter Friedl
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 8.382

6.  Water permeation drives tumor cell migration in confined microenvironments.

Authors:  Kimberly M Stroka; Hongyuan Jiang; Shih-Hsun Chen; Ziqiu Tong; Denis Wirtz; Sean X Sun; Konstantinos Konstantopoulos
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Soft matrix is a natural stimulator for cellular invasiveness.

Authors:  Zhizhan Gu; Fei Liu; Elina A Tonkova; Soo Young Lee; Daniel J Tschumperlin; Michael B Brenner
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 8.  Invadopodia in context.

Authors:  Aviv Bergman; John S Condeelis; Bojana Gligorijevic
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Distinct signaling mechanisms regulate migration in unconfined versus confined spaces.

Authors:  Wei-Chien Hung; Shih-Hsun Chen; Colin D Paul; Kimberly M Stroka; Ying-Chun Lo; Joy T Yang; Konstantinos Konstantopoulos
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Integrin-matrix clusters form podosome-like adhesions in the absence of traction forces.

Authors:  Cheng-han Yu; Nisha Bte Mohd Rafiq; Anitha Krishnasamy; Kevin L Hartman; Gareth E Jones; Alexander D Bershadsky; Michael P Sheetz
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 9.423

View more
  1 in total

1.  Matrix stiffness controls lymphatic vessel formation through regulation of a GATA2-dependent transcriptional program.

Authors:  Maike Frye; Andrea Taddei; Cathrin Dierkes; Ines Martinez-Corral; Matthew Fielden; Henrik Ortsäter; Jan Kazenwadel; Dinis P Calado; Pia Ostergaard; Marjo Salminen; Liqun He; Natasha L Harvey; Friedemann Kiefer; Taija Mäkinen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 14.919

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.