Literature DB >> 25028822

The first Smartphone application for microsurgery monitoring: SilpaRamanitor.

Kidakorn Kiranantawat1, Ngamcherd Sitpahul, Pinyo Taeprasartsit, Joannis Constantinides, Arthi Kruavit, Vichai Srimuninnimit, Narong Punyahotra, Chalermpong Chatdokmaiprai, Surawej Numhom.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative monitoring of free flap tissue perfusion is vital. Devices available are expensive and complex to operate. Most surgeons rely on direct clinical observation. A monitoring system that is reliable, inexpensive, and easy to operate is needed. Using mobile phone technology, the authors developed and evaluated a new free flap monitoring system: SilpaRamanitor.
METHODS: Software was developed for Android-operated mobile phones. Forty-two normal subjects were recruited to assess its effectiveness. Varying degrees of pressure were applied around the index finger to produce partial venous occlusion, partial arterial occlusion, complete venous occlusion, and complete arterial occlusion sequentially. Photographs of each subject's index and middle fingers were taken using the smartphone camera. To detect the abnormal perfusion presented on the index finger, the application was instructed to analyze photographs for color difference, with the unoccluded middle finger serving as the control.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false-negative results, and false-positive results were 94, 98, 95, 6, and 1 percent, respectively. The accuracy of the application in grading occlusion severity was also evaluated. Thirty-nine cases (93 percent) were correctly identified as venous occlusion. The occlusion severity was correctly identified in 33 cases (85 percent). Likewise, for the 40 cases (95 percent) correctly identified as arterial occlusion, the method correctly categorized its severity in 33 cases (83 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: The authors developed a new, accurate, and reliable diagnostic system for postoperative microsurgery monitoring using a smartphone application. SilpaRamanitor is inexpensive and easy to use, making it applicable in many microsurgical settings. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25028822     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  Perioperative Smartphone Apps and Devices for Patient-Centered Care.

Authors:  Allan F Simpao; Arul M Lingappan; Luis M Ahumada; Mohamed A Rehman; Jorge A Gálvez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Modern use of smartphone applications in the perioperative management in microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nakul Gamanlal Patel; Warren Matthew Rozen; Daniel Marsh; Whitney T H Chow; Tobias Vickers; Lubna Khan; George S Miller; David J Hunter-Smith; Venkat V Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

3.  mHealth in Urology: A Review of Experts' Involvement in App Development.

Authors:  Nuno Pereira-Azevedo; Eduardo Carrasquinho; Eduardo Cardoso de Oliveira; Vitor Cavadas; Luís Osório; Avelino Fraga; Miguel Castelo-Branco; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Enabling Remote Monitoring Using Free Apps and Smart Devices for a Free-Flap Adjunct Monitor.

Authors:  James C Yuen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-09-21

5.  Detection of Risk Groups for Carcinogenic Liver Fluke Infection by Verbal Screening Questionnaire Using a Mobile Application

Authors:  Natthawut Kaewpitoon; Soraya J Kaewpitoon; Thirayu Meererksom; Siwawich Chan-Aran; Wararat Sangwalee; Jirawoot Kujapun; Jun Norkaew; Jirayut Chuatanam; Sukanya Ponpimai; Mali Pothipim; Natnapa Padchasuwan; Taweesak Tongtawee; Likit Matrakool; Sukij Panpimanmas; Ryan A Loyd; Parichart Wakkhuwatthapong
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-07-27

Review 6.  Imaging for thinned perforator flap harvest: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Yi Min Khoong; Xin Huang; Shuchen Gu; Tao Zan
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 7.  Telemedicine in Surgical Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Eyitayo Omolara Owolabi; Tamlyn Mac Quene; Johnelize Louw; Justine I Davies; Kathryn M Chu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Telemedicine and Plastic Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Denis Souto Valente; Luciano Silveira Eifler; Lauro Aita Carvalho; Gustavo Azambuja Pereira Filho; Vinicius Weissheimer Ribeiro; Alexandre Vontobel Padoin
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2015-11-02

9.  Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: Current Applications, Future Directions, and Ethical Implications.

Authors:  Tyler Jarvis; Danielle Thornburg; Alanna M Rebecca; Chad M Teven
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.