Gaia Mandolesi1, Giovanni Avancini1, Manuela Bartesaghi2, Eva Bernardi1, Luca Pomidori1, Annalisa Cogo3. 1. Biomedical Sport Studies Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy (Drs Mandolesi, Avancini, Bernardi, Pomidori, and Cogo). 2. Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy (Dr Bartesaghi). 3. Biomedical Sport Studies Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy (Drs Mandolesi, Avancini, Bernardi, Pomidori, and Cogo). Electronic address: annalisa.cogo@unife.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The use of pulse oximetry (Spo2) to identify subjects susceptible to acute mountain sickness (AMS) is the subject of debate. To obtain more reliable data, we monitored Spo2 for 24 hours at altitude to investigate the ability to predict impending AMS. METHODS: The study was conducted during the climb from Alagna (1154 m) to Capanna Regina Margherita (4559 m), with an overnight stay in Capanna Gnifetti (3647 m). Sixty subjects (11 women) were recruited. Each subject was fitted with a 24-hour recording finger pulse oximeter. The subjects rode a cable car to 3275 m and climbed to 3647 m, where they spent the night. RESULTS: In the morning, 24 subjects (6 women) had a Lake Louise Questionnaire score (LLS) ≥ 3 (AMS(+)), and 15 subjects (4 women) exhibited moderate-to-severe disease (LLS ≥ 5 = AMS(++)). At Alagna, Spo2 did not differ between the AMS(-) and AMS(+) subjects. At higher stations, all AMS(+) subjects exhibited a significantly lower Spo2 than did the AMS(-) subjects: at 3275 m, 85.4% vs 87.7%; resting at 3647 m, 84.5% vs 86.4%. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis resulted in a rather poor discrimination between the AMS(-) subjects and all of the AMS(+) subjects. With the cutoff LLS ≥ 5, the sensitivity was 86.67%, the specificity was 82.25%, and the area under the curve was 0.88 (P < .0001) for Spo2 ≤ 84% at 3647 m. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that AMS(+) subjects exhibit a more severe and prolonged oxygen desaturation than do AMS(-) subjects starting from the beginning of altitude exposure, but the predictive power of Spo2 is accurate only for AMS(++).
OBJECTIVE: The use of pulse oximetry (Spo2) to identify subjects susceptible to acute mountain sickness (AMS) is the subject of debate. To obtain more reliable data, we monitored Spo2 for 24 hours at altitude to investigate the ability to predict impending AMS. METHODS: The study was conducted during the climb from Alagna (1154 m) to Capanna Regina Margherita (4559 m), with an overnight stay in Capanna Gnifetti (3647 m). Sixty subjects (11 women) were recruited. Each subject was fitted with a 24-hour recording finger pulse oximeter. The subjects rode a cable car to 3275 m and climbed to 3647 m, where they spent the night. RESULTS: In the morning, 24 subjects (6 women) had a Lake Louise Questionnaire score (LLS) ≥ 3 (AMS(+)), and 15 subjects (4 women) exhibited moderate-to-severe disease (LLS ≥ 5 = AMS(++)). At Alagna, Spo2 did not differ between the AMS(-) and AMS(+) subjects. At higher stations, all AMS(+) subjects exhibited a significantly lower Spo2 than did the AMS(-) subjects: at 3275 m, 85.4% vs 87.7%; resting at 3647 m, 84.5% vs 86.4%. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis resulted in a rather poor discrimination between the AMS(-) subjects and all of the AMS(+) subjects. With the cutoff LLS ≥ 5, the sensitivity was 86.67%, the specificity was 82.25%, and the area under the curve was 0.88 (P < .0001) for Spo2 ≤ 84% at 3647 m. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that AMS(+) subjects exhibit a more severe and prolonged oxygen desaturation than do AMS(-) subjects starting from the beginning of altitude exposure, but the predictive power of Spo2 is accurate only for AMS(++).
Authors: Alexandra B Cobb; Denny Z H Levett; Kay Mitchell; Wynne Aveling; Daniel Hurlbut; Edward Gilbert-Kawai; Philip J Hennis; Monty G Mythen; Michael P W Grocott; Daniel S Martin Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2021-04