Tobias Dünnwald1, Roland Kienast2, David Niederseer3, Martin Burtscher4. 1. Institute for Sports Medicine, Alpine Medicine and Health Tourism (ISAG), UMIT-Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria. 2. Department of Biomedical and Health Technology, Federal Higher Technical Institute for Education and Experimentation-HTL Anichstraße, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. 3. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Heart Center Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland. 4. Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Abstract
Background: Finger pulse oximeters are widely used to monitor physiological responses to high-altitude exposure, the progress of acclimatization, and/or the potential development of high-altitude related diseases. Although there is increasing evidence for its invaluable support at high altitude, some controversy remains, largely due to differences in individual preconditions, evaluation purposes, measurement methods, the use of different devices, and the lacking ability to interpret data correctly. Therefore, this review is aimed at providing information on the functioning of pulse oximeters, appropriate measurement methods and published time courses of pulse oximetry data (peripheral oxygen saturation, (SpO2) and heart rate (HR), recorded at rest and submaximal exercise during exposure to various altitudes. Results: The presented findings from the literature review confirm rather large variations of pulse oximetry measures (SpO2 and HR) during acute exposure and acclimatization to high altitude, related to the varying conditions between studies mentioned above. It turned out that particularly SpO2 levels decrease with acute altitude/hypoxia exposure and partly recover during acclimatization, with an opposite trend of HR. Moreover, the development of acute mountain sickness (AMS) was consistently associated with lower SpO2 values compared to individuals free from AMS. Conclusions: The use of finger pulse oximetry at high altitude is considered as a valuable tool in the evaluation of individual acclimatization to high altitude but also to monitor AMS progression and treatment efficacy.
Background: Finger pulse oximeters are widely used to monitor physiological responses to high-altitude exposure, the progress of acclimatization, and/or the potential development of high-altitude related diseases. Although there is increasing evidence for its invaluable support at high altitude, some controversy remains, largely due to differences in individual preconditions, evaluation purposes, measurement methods, the use of different devices, and the lacking ability to interpret data correctly. Therefore, this review is aimed at providing information on the functioning of pulse oximeters, appropriate measurement methods and published time courses of pulse oximetry data (peripheral oxygen saturation, (SpO2) and heart rate (HR), recorded at rest and submaximal exercise during exposure to various altitudes. Results: The presented findings from the literature review confirm rather large variations of pulse oximetry measures (SpO2 and HR) during acute exposure and acclimatization to high altitude, related to the varying conditions between studies mentioned above. It turned out that particularly SpO2 levels decrease with acute altitude/hypoxia exposure and partly recover during acclimatization, with an opposite trend of HR. Moreover, the development of acute mountain sickness (AMS) was consistently associated with lower SpO2 values compared to individuals free from AMS. Conclusions: The use of finger pulse oximetry at high altitude is considered as a valuable tool in the evaluation of individual acclimatization to high altitude but also to monitor AMS progression and treatment efficacy.
Entities:
Keywords:
acclimatization; acute mountain sickness; high altitude; pulse oximetry; rest and exercise
Authors: Oliver R Gibson; Alan J Richardson; Mark Hayes; Ben Duncan; Neil S Maxwell Journal: Wilderness Environ Med Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 1.518
Authors: P R Bender; R E McCullough; R G McCullough; S Y Huang; P D Wagner; A Cymerman; A J Hamilton; J T Reeves Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 1989-06