Literature DB >> 25027520

Factors associated with vascular complications in patients undergoing balloon-expandable transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement via open versus percutaneous approaches.

Mitul B Kadakia1, Howard C Herrmann1, Nimesh D Desai1, Zachary Fox1, Jeffrey Ogbara1, Saif Anwaruddin1, Dinesh Jagasia1, Joseph E Bavaria1, Wilson Y Szeto1, Prashanth Vallabhajosyula1, Robert Li1, Rohan Menon1, Dale M Kobrin1, Jay Giri2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement are common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Little is known about the effect of access approach on vascular complications. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2013, 331 patients underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement via open surgical (OS) or fully percutaneous (PC) approaches. Patient data and clinical outcomes were collected. Valve Academic Research Consortium-defined vascular complications were noted. Multivariable analysis with propensity matching was performed, and vascular complications, mortality, and length of stay were assessed. One hundred twenty patients were treated with the OS approach and 211 patients via the PC approach. There were fewer major vascular complications (11% versus 20%; P=0.03) and shorter length of stay (7.5 versus 9.9 days; P=0.003) in the PC group when compared with those in the OS group. In multivariable analysis, vascular complications were more likely in women (odds ratio, 2.2; P=0.02) and with increasing differences between sheath outer diameter and minimal artery diameter (overall vascular complications: odds ratio, 1.4; P=0.02 and major vascular complications: odds ratio, 2.0; P<0.001). Propensity-matched analysis demonstrated no difference in vascular complications between the OS and the PC groups (22% versus 19%; P=0.73) but significantly reduced length of stay in the PC group (7.9 versus 10.0 days; P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed via the PC route is associated with similar risk of vascular complications and significantly lower postprocedural length of stay than the OS route. The degree of sheath oversizing with respect to iliofemoral minimal artery diameter and female sex are associated with vascular complications regardless of access approach.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve; aortic valve stenosis; peripheral vascular disease; vascular injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25027520     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  9 in total

1.  In-hospital outcomes comparison of transfemoral vs transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in propensity-matched cohorts with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Rajkumar Doshi; Priyank Shah; Perwaiz M Meraj
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Arterial access and arteriotomy site closure devices.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Strategies for Facilitating Totally Percutaneous Transfemoral TAVR Procedures.

Authors:  Amnon Eitan; Hussein Sliman; Avinoam Shiran; Ronen Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Incidence, Prognosis and Predictors of Major Vascular Complications and Percutaneous Closure Device Failure Following Contemporary Percutaneous Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Wayne Batchelor; Krishna Patel; Julian Hurt; James Totten; Penny Burroughs; Ginny Smith; Mig Cuervo; Lakerria Davis; Abdulla A Damluji; Kelly Epps; Matthew Sherwood; Scott Barnett; Nadim Geloo; Shahram Yazdani; Eric Sarin; Liam Ryan; Thomas Noel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2020-01-15

Review 5.  Large-bore Vascular Closure: New Devices and Techniques.

Authors:  Maarten P van Wiechen; Jurgen M Ligthart; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-02

Review 6.  Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions: Contemporary Insights and Novel Approaches.

Authors:  Renato Francesco Maria Scalise; Armando Mariano Salito; Alberto Polimeni; Victoria Garcia-Ruiz; Vittorio Virga; Pierpaolo Frigione; Giuseppe Andò; Carlo Tumscitz; Francesco Costa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  TAVI: Simplification Is the Ultimate Sophistication.

Authors:  Mariama Akodad; Thierry Lefèvre
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-18

8.  Comparative Outcomes of Transapical Versus Transfemoral Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Diabetics.

Authors:  Ayman Elbadawi; Ahmed H Mohamed; Islam Y Elgendy; Gbolahan O Ogunbayo; Michael Megaly; Hend I Shahin; Karim Mahmoud; Mohamed A Omer; Ahmed Abuzaid; Ken Fujise; Syed Gilani
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2019-11-11

Review 9.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): expanding indications to low-risk patients.

Authors:  Hector Cubero-Gallego; Christian Dam; Juan Meca; Pablo Avanzas
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.