Literature DB >> 25026311

The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.

Kyong-Hwa Jun1, Jeong-Sun Lee2, Ji-Hyun Kim1, Jin-Jo Kim2, Hyung-Min Chin1, Seung-Man Park3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for gastric cancer is more detailed than the 6th edition with respect to tumor depth and lymph node metastasis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rationality of the 7th UICC/AJCC TNM classification system, focusing on N3 gastric cancers.
METHODS: A total of 338 patients with N3 gastric cancer who underwent curative resection with ≥ 16 retrieved lymph nodes at two institutions between January 1997 and December 2007 were included in this study. Patients were divided into the N3a (n = 210) and N3b (n = 128) groups. Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival rates were compared between groups.
RESULTS: No difference in clinicopathologic characteristics, including age (p = 0.989), sex (p = 0.382), tumor location (p = 0.124), surgery type (p = 0.909), depth of invasion (p = 0.313), histologic type (p = 0.111), and Lauren classification (p = 0.491), was observed between patients with N3a and N3b gastric cancer. However, overall survival (OS) rates of patients with N3a gastric cancer were greater than that of patients with N3b gastric cancer (5-year OS, 46% vs. 28%; 10-year OS, 33% vs. 19%; both p < 0.001). Five-year survival rates differed significantly between patients with T3N3a and T3N3b (p = 0.006) sub-stages and between those with T4aN3a and T4aN3b (p = 0.004) sub-stages.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support N3 sub-classification for gastric cancers, which warrant differential consideration according to TNM stage.
Copyright © 2014 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; N3; Overall survival; TNM staging

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25026311     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  10 in total

1.  Should All Stage N3b Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Be Considered Equivalent? A 30-Year Single Center Study.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Jin-Yu Huang; Peng-Liang Wang; Wen-Bin Hou; Song-Cheng Yin; Hui-Mian Xu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The prognosis role of AJCC/UICC 8th edition staging system in gastric cancer, a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jiu-Yang Liu; Chun-Wei Peng; Xiao-Jun Yang; Chao-Qun Huang; Yan Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  High expression of Nectin-4 is associated with unfavorable prognosis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Jiaxuan Zhang; Qin Shen; Wei Yin; Hua Huang; Yifei Liu; Qingfeng Ni
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Validation of the 7th AJCC/UICC staging system for gastric cancer and a proposal for a new TNM system based on a prognostic score: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Oh Kyoung Kwon; Se Won Kim; Hyun-Dong Chae; Seung Wan Ryu; Ho Young Chung; Sang Woon Kim; Won Kee Lee; Wansik Yu
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 1.859

5.  Prognostic value of skeletal muscle index and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio for lymph node-positive breast cancer patients after mastectomy.

Authors:  Jia-Peng Deng; Xin Hua; Zhi-Qing Long; Wen-Wen Zhang; Huan-Xin Lin; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

6.  N3 subclassification incorporated into the final pathologic staging of gastric cancer: a modified system based on current AJCC staging.

Authors:  Chun-Nan Yeh; Shang-Yu Wang; Jun-Te Hsu; Kun-Chun Chiang; Chi-Tung Cheng; Chun-Yi Tsai; Yu-Yin Liu; Chien-Hung Liao; Keng-Hao Liu; Ta-Sen Yeh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for patients with stage III gastric cancer: survival analysis of a large series from a Specialized Eastern Center.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Long-Long Cao; Shao-Wei Ling; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Detection of miR-1246, miR-23a and miR-451 in sera of colorectal carcinoma patients: a case-control study in Cairo University hospital.

Authors:  Mona Salah; Iman Shaheen; Pakinam El-Shanawany; Nagwa Eid Saad; Rasha Saad; Mahmoud El Guibaly; Nouran Momen
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 0.927

9.  Prognostic significance of the skeletal muscle index and systemic inflammatory index in patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer after radical mastectomy.

Authors:  Ru Tang; Jia-Peng Deng; Lei Zhang; Wen-Wen Zhang; Jia-Yuan Sun; Feng Chi; Jun Zhang; San-Gang Wu; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Up-regulation of miR-95-3p in hepatocellular carcinoma promotes tumorigenesis by targeting p21 expression.

Authors:  Jian Ye; Yufeng Yao; Qixue Song; Sisi Li; Zhenkun Hu; Yubing Yu; Changqing Hu; Xingwen Da; Hui Li; Qiuyun Chen; Qing K Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.