Tomasz Gredes1, Pawel Kubasiewicz-Ross, Tomasz Gedrange, Marzena Dominiak, Christiane Kunert-Keil. 1. *Assistant Medical Director, Department of Orthodontics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. †Assistant Medical Director, Department of Oral Surgery, Silesian Piast Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland. ‡Head of Department, Department of Orthodontics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. §Head of Department, Department of Oral Surgery, Silesian Piast Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland. ‖Cheif of the Research Labor, Department of Orthodontics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: New biomaterials and their various surface modifications should undergo in vitro and in vivo evaluation before clinical trials. The objective of our in vivo study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of newly created zirconium implant surfaces after implantation in the lower jaw of pigs and compare the osseointegration of these dental implants with commercially available zirconium and titanium implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a healing period of 12 weeks, a histological analysis of the soft and hard tissues and a histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact (BIC) were performed. RESULTS: The implant surfaces showed an intimate connection to the adjacent bone for all tested implants. The 3 newly created zirconium implant surfaces achieved a BIC of 45% on average in comparison with a BIC of 56% from the reference zirconium implants and 35% from titanium implants. Furthermore, the new zirconium implants had a better attachment to gingival and bone tissues in the range of implant necks as compared with the reference implants. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the new implants comparably osseointegrate within the healing period, and they have a good in vivo biocompatibility.
INTRODUCTION: New biomaterials and their various surface modifications should undergo in vitro and in vivo evaluation before clinical trials. The objective of our in vivo study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of newly created zirconium implant surfaces after implantation in the lower jaw of pigs and compare the osseointegration of these dental implants with commercially available zirconium and titanium implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a healing period of 12 weeks, a histological analysis of the soft and hard tissues and a histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact (BIC) were performed. RESULTS: The implant surfaces showed an intimate connection to the adjacent bone for all tested implants. The 3 newly created zirconium implant surfaces achieved a BIC of 45% on average in comparison with a BIC of 56% from the reference zirconium implants and 35% from titanium implants. Furthermore, the new zirconium implants had a better attachment to gingival and bone tissues in the range of implant necks as compared with the reference implants. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the new implants comparably osseointegrate within the healing period, and they have a good in vivo biocompatibility.