| Literature DB >> 25024934 |
Lee Ying1, Xavier Matabosch1, Montserrat Serra1, Berna Watson1, Cedric Shackleton1, Gordon Watson1.
Abstract
Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) is an inborn error of cholesterol synthesis resulting from a defect in 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR7), the enzyme that produces cholesterol from its immediate precursor 7-dehydrocholesterol. Current therapy employing dietary cholesterol is inadequate. As SLOS is caused by a defect in a single gene, restoring enzyme functionality through gene therapy may be a direct approach for treating this debilitating disorder. In the present study, we first packaged a human DHCR7 construct into adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors having either type-2 (AAV2) or type-8 (AAV2/8) capsid, and administered treatment to juvenile mice. While a positive response (assessed by increases in serum and liver cholesterol) was seen in both groups, the improvement was greater in the AAV2/8-DHCR7 treated mice. Newborn mice were then treated with AAV2/8-DHCR7 and these mice, compared to mice treated as juveniles, showed higher DHCR7 mRNA expression in liver and a greater improvement in serum and liver cholesterol levels. Systemic treatment did not affect brain cholesterol in any of the experimental groups. Both juvenile and newborn treatments with AAV2/8-DHCR7 resulted in increased rates of weight gain indicating that gene transfer had a positive physiological effect.Entities:
Keywords: 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR7); AAV; Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS); cholesterol synthesis; gene therapy
Year: 2014 PMID: 25024934 PMCID: PMC4093838 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2014.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Metab Rep ISSN: 2214-4269
Fig. 1Expression of hDHCR7 mRNA in livers of treated mice. (a) RT-PCR was performed on liver RNA. Lanes 1 and 2 are from mouse A, lanes 3 and 4 are from mouse B etc. In odd numbered lanes primers to the hDHCR7 gene (123 base pair PCR product) were used, and in even numbered lanes primers to the mouse homologue (mDhcr7, 125 base pair product) were used. mDhcr7 was expressed in both control (A, B, C) and AAV2/8–DHCR7 treated (D, E, F) mice. hDHCR7 was expressed only in the treated mice. Qualitatively similar results were seen from all treated and control mice. (b) Levels of hDHCR7 mRNA expression determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Each bar represents the average relative mRNA expression ± SEM. Relative mRNA expression was calculated by dividing the concentration of hDHCR7 mRNA by the concentration of mGAPDH mRNA. The hDHCR7 expression in mice treated with AAV vector was significantly higher than background levels in sham-treated controls (AAV2–DHCR7 Juveniles: P = 0.03; AAV2/8–DHCR7 Juveniles: P < 0.01; AAV2/8–DHCR7 Newborns: P < 0.01).
Fig. 2Weekly 7DHC/C ratios in serum comparing treated and sham-treated littermates. (a) AAV2–DHCR7 treated juvenile cohort. (b) AAV2/8–DHCR7 treated juvenile cohort. (c) AAV2/8–DHCR7 treated newborn cohort. *Denotes statistically significant (P < 0.05) differences in 7DHC/C ratio.
Fig. 3Systemic treatment lowers DHC/C ratios in liver but not brain. (a) 7DHC/C ratios were determined for liver; (b) [7DHC + 8DHC]/C ratios were determined for brain. Because 8DHC levels in liver were not measurably above background, only 7DHC measurements were used to calculate DHC/C ratios. In brain 8DHC levels were significant and were therefore included in DHC/C ratios. Ratios shown are means ± SEM.
Fig. 4Change in rate of weight gain following treatment. The weight of each animal at each time point was compared to its own weight at the time of injection or at the time of weaning. This provided cumulative % weight gains at weekly intervals. (a) Juveniles treated with AAV2–DHCR7 with weight gain indexed to the time of injection at 4 weeks of age (no statistical difference between treated and untreated). (b) Juveniles treated with AAV2/8–DHCR7 with weight gain indexed to time of injection at 4 weeks of age (treatment difference, P < 0.001). (c) Newborns treated with AAV2/8–DHCR7 with weight indexed to the time of weaning at 3 weeks of age (treatment difference, P < 0.001). Statistical comparisons of treated vs. littermate controls employed the mixed random effects model for longitudinal analysis.