BACKGROUND: Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) is a rare hereditary disorder of cholesterol metabolism. We examine the feasibility of identifying SLOS as a part of a routine prenatal screening and evaluate diagnostic testing in maternal urine (or serum), in addition to amniotic fluid. METHODS: Our SLOS risk algorithm utilized three Down syndrome screening markers (estimated 62% detection rate; 0.3% screen-positive rate). Fifteen North American prenatal screening programs implemented this algorithm. RESULTS: SLOS risk was assigned to 1 079 301 pregnancies; 3083 were screen-positive (0.29%). Explanations were found for 1174, including 914 existing fetal deaths. Among the remaining pregnancies, 739 were screen-positive only for SLOS; 1170 were also screen-positive for other fetal disorders. Five of six SLOS pregnancies (83%) were screen-positive. All six had sonographic findings, were biochemically confirmed, and were terminated. Maternal urine steroid measurements were confirmatory in four cases tested. Second-trimester prevalence among Caucasians was 1 in 101 000 (1 in 130 000 overall; no cases in other racial groups). Among 739 pregnancies screen-positive only for SLOS, two cases were identified; another 69 had major fetal abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Although SLOS occurred less often than previously reported, many other major abnormalities were detected. Implementing the algorithm as an adjunct to Down syndrome screening may be feasible.
BACKGROUND:Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) is a rare hereditary disorder of cholesterol metabolism. We examine the feasibility of identifying SLOS as a part of a routine prenatal screening and evaluate diagnostic testing in maternal urine (or serum), in addition to amniotic fluid. METHODS: Our SLOS risk algorithm utilized three Down syndrome screening markers (estimated 62% detection rate; 0.3% screen-positive rate). Fifteen North American prenatal screening programs implemented this algorithm. RESULTS:SLOS risk was assigned to 1 079 301 pregnancies; 3083 were screen-positive (0.29%). Explanations were found for 1174, including 914 existing fetal deaths. Among the remaining pregnancies, 739 were screen-positive only for SLOS; 1170 were also screen-positive for other fetal disorders. Five of six SLOS pregnancies (83%) were screen-positive. All six had sonographic findings, were biochemically confirmed, and were terminated. Maternal urine steroid measurements were confirmatory in four cases tested. Second-trimester prevalence among Caucasians was 1 in 101 000 (1 in 130 000 overall; no cases in other racial groups). Among 739 pregnancies screen-positive only for SLOS, two cases were identified; another 69 had major fetal abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Although SLOS occurred less often than previously reported, many other major abnormalities were detected. Implementing the algorithm as an adjunct to Down syndrome screening may be feasible.
Authors: Deug-Chan Lee; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero; Adi L Tarca; Gaurav Bhatti; Maria Teresa Gervasi; Joseph A Caruso; Paul M Stemmer; Chong Jai Kim; Lea Kirstine Hansen; Naja Becher; Niels Uldbjerg Journal: J Proteomics Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Elizabeth McPherson; Ginger D Thomas; Christopher Manlick; Christina A Zaleski; Kara K Reynolds; Kristen Rasmussen; Philip F Giampietro; Carmen Wiley; Maria Mascola Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Josep Marcos; Cedric H L Shackleton; Madhavee M Buddhikot; Forbes D Porter; Gordon L Watson Journal: Steroids Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Jodi D Hoffman; Diana W Bianchi; Lisa M Sullivan; Brenda L Mackinnon; Jamie Collins; Fergal D Malone; T Flint Porter; David A Nyberg; Christine H Comstock; Radek Bukowski; Richard L Berkowitz; Susan J Gross; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Mary E D'Alton Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Ignatia B Van den Veyver; Ankita Patel; Chad A Shaw; Amber N Pursley; Sung-Hae L Kang; Marcia J Simovich; Patricia A Ward; Sandra Darilek; Anthony Johnson; Sarah E Neill; Weimin Bi; Lisa D White; Christine M Eng; James R Lupski; Sau Wai Cheung; Arthur L Beaudet Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.050