R S Hum1, K Cato2, B Sheehan3, S Patel4, J Duchon1, P DeLaMora5, Y H Ferng2, P Graham6, D K Vawdrey7, J Perlman5, E Larson8, L Saiman9. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University , NY, NY. 2. School of Nursing, Columbia University , NY, NY. 3. Faculty Practice Organization, Columbia University , NY, NY. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University , Chicago, IL. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College , NY, NY. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University , NY, NY ; Department of Quality and Patient Safety, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital , NY, NY ; Department of Infection Prevention & Control, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital , NY, NY. 7. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University , NY, NY. 8. School of Nursing, Columbia University , NY, NY ; School of Nursing and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University , NY, NY. 9. Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University , NY, NY ; Department of Infection Prevention & Control, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital , NY, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a clinical decision support (CDS) tool to improve antibiotic prescribing in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to evaluate user acceptance of the CDS tool. METHODS: Following sociotechnical analysis of NICU prescribing processes, a CDS tool for empiric and targeted antimicrobial therapy for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) was developed and incorporated into a commercial electronic health record (EHR) in two NICUs. User logs were reviewed and NICU prescribers were surveyed for their perceptions of the CDS tool. RESULTS: The CDS tool aggregated selected laboratory results, including culture results, to make treatment recommendations for common clinical scenarios. From July 2010 to May 2012, 1,303 CDS activations for 452 patients occurred representing 22% of patients prescribed antibiotics during this period. While NICU clinicians viewed two culture results per tool activation, prescribing recommendations were viewed during only 15% of activations. Most (63%) survey respondents were aware of the CDS tool, but fewer (37%) used it during their most recent NICU rotation. Respondents considered the most useful features to be summarized culture results (43%) and antibiotic recommendations (48%). DISCUSSION: During the study period, the CDS tool functionality was hindered by EHR upgrades, implementation of a new laboratory information system, and changes to antimicrobial testing methodologies. Loss of functionality may have reduced viewing antibiotic recommendations. In contrast, viewing culture results was frequently performed, likely because this feature was perceived as useful and functionality was preserved. CONCLUSION: To improve CDS tool visibility and usefulness, we recommend early user and information technology team involvement which would facilitate use and mitigate implementation challenges.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a clinical decision support (CDS) tool to improve antibiotic prescribing in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to evaluate user acceptance of the CDS tool. METHODS: Following sociotechnical analysis of NICU prescribing processes, a CDS tool for empiric and targeted antimicrobial therapy for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) was developed and incorporated into a commercial electronic health record (EHR) in two NICUs. User logs were reviewed and NICU prescribers were surveyed for their perceptions of the CDS tool. RESULTS: The CDS tool aggregated selected laboratory results, including culture results, to make treatment recommendations for common clinical scenarios. From July 2010 to May 2012, 1,303 CDS activations for 452 patients occurred representing 22% of patients prescribed antibiotics during this period. While NICU clinicians viewed two culture results per tool activation, prescribing recommendations were viewed during only 15% of activations. Most (63%) survey respondents were aware of the CDS tool, but fewer (37%) used it during their most recent NICU rotation. Respondents considered the most useful features to be summarized culture results (43%) and antibiotic recommendations (48%). DISCUSSION: During the study period, the CDS tool functionality was hindered by EHR upgrades, implementation of a new laboratory information system, and changes to antimicrobial testing methodologies. Loss of functionality may have reduced viewing antibiotic recommendations. In contrast, viewing culture results was frequently performed, likely because this feature was perceived as useful and functionality was preserved. CONCLUSION: To improve CDS tool visibility and usefulness, we recommend early user and information technology team involvement which would facilitate use and mitigate implementation challenges.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antimicrobial stewardship; clinical decision support; implementation; neonatal intensive care unit
Authors: Timothy H Dellit; Robert C Owens; John E McGowan; Dale N Gerding; Robert A Weinstein; John P Burke; W Charles Huskins; David L Paterson; Neil O Fishman; Christopher F Carpenter; P J Brennan; Marianne Billeter; Thomas M Hooton Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-12-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jennifer Duchon; Philip Graham Iii; Phyllis Della-Latta; Susan Whittier; Diane Carp; David Bateman; Lisa Saiman Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Jaclyn B York; Megan Z Cardoso; Dara S Azuma; Kristyn S Beam; Geoffrey G Binney; Saul N Weingart Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Tera L Reynolds; Patricia R DeLucia; Karen A Esquibel; Todd Gage; Noah J Wheeler; J Adam Randell; James G Stevenson; Kai Zheng Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2019-01-04
Authors: D Donà; E Barbieri; M Daverio; R Lundin; C Giaquinto; T Zaoutis; M Sharland Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: H Akhloufi; H van der Sijs; D C Melles; C P van der Hoeven; M Vogel; J W Mouton; A Verbon Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 3.298