Literature DB >> 25024365

An optimized, synthetic DNA vaccine encoding the toxin A and toxin B receptor binding domains of Clostridium difficile induces protective antibody responses in vivo.

Scott M Baliban1, Amanda Michael2, Berje Shammassian2, Shikata Mudakha2, Amir S Khan3, Simon Cocklin4, Isaac Zentner4, Brian P Latimer2, Laurent Bouillaut5, Meredith Hunter6, Preston Marx6, Niranjan Y Sardesai3, Seth L Welles7, Jeffrey M Jacobson2, David B Weiner8, Michele A Kutzler9.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) constitutes a large majority of nosocomial diarrhea cases in industrialized nations and is mediated by the effects of two secreted toxins, toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB). Patients who develop strong antitoxin antibody responses can clear C. difficile infection and remain disease free. Key toxin-neutralizing epitopes have been found within the carboxy-terminal receptor binding domains (RBDs) of TcdA and TcdB, which has generated interest in developing the RBD as a viable vaccine target. While numerous platforms have been studied, very little data describes the potential of DNA vaccination against CDAD. Therefore, we created highly optimized plasmids encoding the RBDs from TcdA and TcdB in which any putative N-linked glycosylation sites were altered. Mice and nonhuman primates were immunized intramuscularly, followed by in vivo electroporation, and in these animal models, vaccination induced significant levels of both anti-RBD antibodies (blood and stool) and RBD-specific antibody-secreting cells. Further characterization revealed that sera from immunized mice and nonhuman primates could detect RBD protein from transfected cells, as well as neutralize purified toxins in an in vitro cytotoxicity assay. Mice that were immunized with plasmids or given nonhuman-primate sera were protected from a lethal challenge with purified TcdA and/or TcdB. Moreover, immunized mice were significantly protected when challenged with C. difficile spores from homologous (VPI 10463) and heterologous, epidemic (UK1) strains. These data demonstrate the robust immunogenicity and efficacy of a TcdA/B RBD-based DNA vaccine in preclinical models of acute toxin-associated and intragastric, spore-induced colonic disease.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25024365      PMCID: PMC4187890          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01950-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  70 in total

1.  The complete receptor-binding domain of Clostridium difficile toxin A is required for endocytosis.

Authors:  Cornelia Frisch; Ralf Gerhard; Klaus Aktories; Fred Hofmann; Ingo Just
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Comparative sequence analysis of the Clostridium difficile toxins A and B.

Authors:  C von Eichel-Streiber; R Laufenberg-Feldmann; S Sartingen; J Schulze; M Sauerborn
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1992-05

Review 3.  Immunoglobulin class switching.

Authors:  J Stavnezer
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.486

4.  Lysosomal involvement in cellular intoxication with Clostridium difficile toxin B.

Authors:  I Florin; M Thelestam
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Circulating rotavirus-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) predict the presence of rotavirus-specific ASCs in the human small intestinal lamina propria.

Authors:  K A Brown; J A Kriss; C A Moser; W J Wenner; P A Offit
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Fatal pseudomembranous colitis associated with a variant clostridium difficile strain not detected by toxin A immunoassay.

Authors:  S Johnson; S A Kent; K J O'Leary; M M Merrigan; S P Sambol; L R Peterson; D N Gerding
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile-associated disease: Past and present perspectives.

Authors:  Glen P Carter; Julian I Rood; Dena Lyras
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2010-01

8.  Laboratory maintenance of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Joseph A Sorg; Sean S Dineen
Journal:  Curr Protoc Microbiol       Date:  2009-02

9.  Safety and comparative immunogenicity of an HIV-1 DNA vaccine in combination with plasmid interleukin 12 and impact of intramuscular electroporation for delivery.

Authors:  Spyros A Kalams; Scott D Parker; Marnie Elizaga; Barbara Metch; Srilatha Edupuganti; John Hural; Stephen De Rosa; Donald K Carter; Kyle Rybczyk; Ian Frank; Jonathan Fuchs; Beryl Koblin; Denny H Kim; Patrice Joseph; Michael C Keefer; Lindsey R Baden; John Eldridge; Jean Boyer; Adam Sherwat; Massimo Cardinali; Mary Allen; Michael Pensiero; Chris Butler; Amir S Khan; Jian Yan; Niranjan Y Sardesai; James G Kublin; David B Weiner
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  A DNA vaccine targeting the receptor-binding domain of Clostridium difficile toxin A.

Authors:  David F Gardiner; Talia Rosenberg; Jerry Zaharatos; David Franco; David D Ho
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The potential for emerging therapeutic options for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Harsh Mathur; Mary C Rea; Paul D Cotter; R Paul Ross; Colin Hill
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2014

Review 2.  The role of toxins in Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Ramyavardhanee Chandrasekaran; D Borden Lacy
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 16.408

3.  Ambush of Clostridium difficile spores by ramoplanin: activity in an in vitro model.

Authors:  Carl N Kraus; Matthew W Lyerly; Robert J Carman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A DNA vaccine targeting TcdA and TcdB induces protective immunity against Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Bao-Zhong Zhang; Jianpiao Cai; Bin Yu; Yanhong Hua; Candy Choiyi Lau; Richard Yi-Tsun Tsun Kao; Kong-Hung Sze; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Jian-Dong Huang
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Immunization with Recombinant TcdB-Encapsulated Nanocomplex Induces Protection against Clostridium difficile Challenge in a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Yu-Hung Chen; Jenn-Wei Chen; Pei-Jane Tsai; I-Hsiu Huang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  A Review of Experimental and Off-Label Therapies for Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Csaba Fehér; Alex Soriano; Josep Mensa
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2016-12-01

7.  Vaccination against Clostridium difficile by Use of an Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Vector (YS1646) Protects Mice from Lethal Challenge.

Authors:  Kaitlin Winter; Li Xing; Audrey Kassardjian; Brian J Ward
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Immunogenicity and Protection from Receptor-Binding Domains of Toxins as Potential Vaccine Candidates for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Deyan Luo; Xuechao Liu; Li Xing; Yakun Sun; Jie Huang; Liangyan Zhang; Jiajia Li; Hui Wang
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-08

9.  A Replicating Single-Cycle Adenovirus Vaccine Effective against Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  William E Matchett; Stephanie Anguiano-Zarate; Goda Baddage Rakitha Malewana; Haley Mudrick; Melissa Weldy; Clayton Evert; Alexander Khoruts; Michael Sadowsky; Michael A Barry
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-22

Review 10.  The impact of immuno-aging on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development.

Authors:  Jennifer Connors; Matthew R Bell; Jennifer Marcy; Michele Kutzler; Elias K Haddad
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 7.713

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.