| Literature DB >> 25023966 |
Isabelle Bartram, Nicola Gökbuget, Cornelia Schlee, Sandra Heesch, Lars Fransecky, Stefan Schwartz, Reingard Stuhlmann, Kerstin Schäfer-Eckhart, Michael Starck, Albrecht Reichle, Dieter Hoelzer, Claudia D Baldus, Martin Neumann1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification, detection of minimal residual disease (MRD), and implementation of novel therapeutic agents have improved outcome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but survival of adult patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) remains unsatisfactory. Thus, novel molecular insights and therapeutic approaches are urgently needed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25023966 PMCID: PMC4223626 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-014-0051-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hematol Oncol ISSN: 1756-8722 Impact factor: 17.388
Figure 1BCL11b expression in the stages of normal T-cell development. In the murine model BCL11b expression begins during the transition of DN1 to DN2 and continues throughout further differentiation steps and in mature T-cells [[39]]. Knockout at DN2 stage leads to a NK like phenotype with differentiation arrest and a high proliferative potential [[13]]. The corresponding human T-ALL immunophenotypes are indicated. DN = Double Negative, DP = Double Positive, NK = Natural Killer cells, ETP = Early T-cell progenitors, ▲up-regulation, ▼down-regulation.
Figure 2mRNA expression in T-ALL patients and healthy donors. A heterogeneous expression pattern was observed within the T-ALL patient samples. Samples from healthy donors had a significantly higher expression of BCL11b in CD3 positive mature T-cells than in CD34 positive progenitor cells or unselected bone marrow (BM) samples. T-ALL patients were split into BCL11b expression quartiles and patients with low or lacking expression were combined in Q1 and patients with high expression in Q2-4. Outliers (n = 4 T-ALL patients, BCL11b expression values: 6.3, 7.6, 9.7, 12.3) were omitted from the diagram but included in the statistical analysis. BM = bone marrow; *** P < 0.01.
Figure 3Gene expression profiles reveal an immature phenotype in-group. A: Heat map of two-fold or greater differentially expressed genes between BCL11b quartile 1 (Q1) and quartiles 2-4 (Q2-4). B: Gene set enrichment analysis for differentially regulated genes in physiological T-cell development according to their BCL11b expression. On the left side the top hundred down-regulated genes are shown, on the right side the top hundred up-regulated genes. The lists were taken from Noversthern et al. [[37]].
Clinical characteristics of GMALL T-ALL patients with respect to expression
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 40 | 129 | |
| | | ||
| Median | 0.1 | 0.8 | |
| Range | 0-0.2 | 0.2-12.3 | |
| Age | | | n.s. |
| 15-35 yrs | 27 | 70 | |
| 36-55 yrs | 13 | 48 | |
| 56-65 yrs | 0 | 11 | |
| Sex | | | n.s. |
| Female % | 20% | 26% | |
| WBC, × 109/l | | 0.01 | |
| <30,000 | 24 | 42 | |
| 30-100,000 | 10 | 53 | |
| >100,000 | 5 | 30 | |
| T-ALL subtype | | 0.01 | |
| Early n (%) | 17 (42%) | 23 (18%) | |
| Mature n (%) | 5 (13%) | 22 (17%) | |
| Thymic n (%) | 18 (45%) | 84 (65%) | |
| Response to induction therapy | n.s. | ||
| CR n (%) | 37 (95%) | 115 (94%) | |
| ED n (%) | 1 (3%) | 3 (2%) | |
| Failure n (%) | 1 (3%) | 5 (4%) | |
Abbreviations: CR = complete remission, ED = early death, WBC = white blood cell count.
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier analyses of overall survival (OS) and remission duration in T-ALL with respect tomRNA expression. A: T-ALL patients with low BCL11b expression showed significant inferior OS than patients with higher expression (low expression quartile Q1 vs. high Q2-4 expression quartiles; P = 0.02; log-rank test). B: The BCL11b low expressing thymic T-ALL patients had a highly significant inferior OS (P < 0.01).
Figure 5Mutations found in exon 4 ofin T-ALL. Mutation analysis was performed by Sanger Sequencing in 178 T-ALL patients, 14% of patients were revealed to harbor protein changing mutations in exon 4 of BCL11b.