PURPOSE: In adult T-lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) disease-free survival remains limited to 32% to 46%. The adverse prognosis in T-ALL has not been attributed to cytogenetic or molecular aberrations. We have determined the prognostic impact of the oncogenic transcription factor ERG in T-ALL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ERG expression was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 105 adults with newly diagnosed T-ALL treated on the German ALL protocols. Patients were dichotomized at ERG's median expression into low (n = 52) and high (n = 53) expressers. Homeobox (HOX) 11 and HOX11L2 expression was determined by real-time PCR. RESULTS: High ERG expressers compared with low ERG expressers had an inferior overall survival (OS, P = .02; 5-year OS: high ERG 26% v low ERG 58%) and relapse-free survival (RFS, P = .003; 5-year RFS: high ERG 34% v low ERG 72%). On multivariable analysis high ERG expression (P = .005), immunophenotypic subgroups (early v mature v thymic T-ALL; overall P = .04), HOX11L2 positivity (P = .055), and absence of HOX11 (P = .017) were independent adverse risk factors predicting RFS. Patients with high ERG expression had a hazard ratio (HR) for relapse of 3.2. Within the good prognostic subgroup of thymic T-ALL (n = 57), high ERG (HR, 4.1; P = .02) and presence of HOX11L2 (HR, 6.6; P = .008) were independent adverse factors for RFS. CONCLUSION: High expression of ERG is an adverse risk factor in adult T-ALL. Within thymic T-ALL, otherwise classified as standard-risk, high ERG expression-identified patients that were four times more likely to fail long-term RFS. The prognostic impact of ERG may assist treatment stratification and suggest the need of alternative regimens.
PURPOSE: In adult T-lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) disease-free survival remains limited to 32% to 46%. The adverse prognosis in T-ALL has not been attributed to cytogenetic or molecular aberrations. We have determined the prognostic impact of the oncogenic transcription factor ERG in T-ALL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ERG expression was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 105 adults with newly diagnosed T-ALL treated on the German ALL protocols. Patients were dichotomized at ERG's median expression into low (n = 52) and high (n = 53) expressers. Homeobox (HOX) 11 and HOX11L2 expression was determined by real-time PCR. RESULTS: High ERG expressers compared with low ERG expressers had an inferior overall survival (OS, P = .02; 5-year OS: high ERG 26% v low ERG 58%) and relapse-free survival (RFS, P = .003; 5-year RFS: high ERG 34% v low ERG 72%). On multivariable analysis high ERG expression (P = .005), immunophenotypic subgroups (early v mature v thymic T-ALL; overall P = .04), HOX11L2 positivity (P = .055), and absence of HOX11 (P = .017) were independent adverse risk factors predicting RFS. Patients with high ERG expression had a hazard ratio (HR) for relapse of 3.2. Within the good prognostic subgroup of thymic T-ALL (n = 57), high ERG (HR, 4.1; P = .02) and presence of HOX11L2 (HR, 6.6; P = .008) were independent adverse factors for RFS. CONCLUSION: High expression of ERG is an adverse risk factor in adult T-ALL. Within thymic T-ALL, otherwise classified as standard-risk, high ERG expression-identified patients that were four times more likely to fail long-term RFS. The prognostic impact of ERG may assist treatment stratification and suggest the need of alternative regimens.
Authors: Y Huang; J A I Thoms; M L Tursky; K Knezevic; D Beck; V Chandrakanthan; S Suryani; J Olivier; A Boulton; E N Glaros; S R Thomas; R B Lock; K L MacKenzie; J H Bushweller; J W H Wong; J E Pimanda Journal: Leukemia Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Sarah C Roode; Daniel Rotroff; Anne C Avery; Steven E Suter; Dorothee Bienzle; Joshua D Schiffman; Alison Motsinger-Reif; Matthew Breen Journal: Chromosome Res Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.239
Authors: Ashwin Unnikrishnan; Yi F Guan; Yizhou Huang; Dominik Beck; Julie A I Thoms; Sofie Peirs; Kathy Knezevic; Shiyong Ma; Inge V de Walle; Ineke de Jong; Zara Ali; Ling Zhong; Mark J Raftery; Tom Taghon; Jonas Larsson; Karen L MacKenzie; Pieter Van Vlierberghe; Jason W H Wong; John E Pimanda Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Catherine L Carmichael; Donald Metcalf; Katya J Henley; Elizabeth A Kruse; Ladina Di Rago; Sandra Mifsud; Warren S Alexander; Benjamin T Kile Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Elaine Coustan-Smith; Charles G Mullighan; Mihaela Onciu; Frederick G Behm; Susana C Raimondi; Deqing Pei; Cheng Cheng; Xiaoping Su; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Giuseppe Basso; Andrea Biondi; Ching-Hon Pui; James R Downing; Dario Campana Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 41.316