Literature DB >> 25023291

Magnetic resonance imaging-based tumour perfusion parameters are biomarkers predicting response after radiation to brain metastases.

R Jakubovic1, A Sahgal2, H Soliman2, R Milwid3, L Zhang3, A Eilaghi3, R I Aviv4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether early relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and permeability (Ktrans(2)) measurements may serve as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers of radiation response or progression for brain metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy brain metastases in 44 patients treated with either stereotactic radiosurgery or whole brain radiotherapy were imaged with dynamic susceptibility and dynamic contrast enhancement MRI at baseline, 1 week and 1 month after treatment. The final response status was determined according to volume criteria derived from a 1 year post-treatment MRI or last available follow-up MRI. Tumours were characterised as responders, non-responders, progressors and non-progressors and compared for Ktrans(2), rCBF and rCBV differences. Uni- and multivariate analysis evaluated factors associated with tumour response and progression at 1 week and 1 month. A generalised estimating equations (GEE) model accounted for multiple tumours per subject. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity for response or progression.
RESULTS: Tumour responders showed lower Ktrans(2) and reduced rCBF at 1 week (P < 0.05 each). Progressive disease showed lower rCBF and reduced rCBV at 1 month (P < 0.05 each). GEE and multivariate analysis revealed lower Ktrans(2) at 1 week, an absence of prior radiation predicted response. At 1 month only lower rCBV predicted progressive disease on GEE and multivariate analysis. Optimal cut-off points for Ktrans(2) and rCBV were 1.37 and 2.03 with sensitivity and specificity of 61.5 and 81.1% and 73.9 and 81.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Lower Ktrans(2) at 1 week and rCBV at 1 month discriminated responders and progressive disease, respectively.
Copyright © 2014 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging; dynamic susceptibility imaging; magnetic resonance perfusion; magnetic resonance permeability; metastasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25023291     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  19 in total

Review 1.  Brain metastases: neuroimaging.

Authors:  Whitney B Pope
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging pharmacokinetic parameters as predictors of treatment response of brain metastases in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Grégory Kuchcinski; Emilie Le Rhun; Alexis B Cortot; Elodie Drumez; Romain Duhal; Maxime Lalisse; Julien Dumont; Renaud Lopes; Jean-Pierre Pruvo; Xavier Leclerc; Christine Delmaire
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The predictive capacity of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in response assessment of brain metastases following radiation.

Authors:  Raphael Jakubovic; Stephanie Zhou; Chris Heyn; Hany Soliman; Liyang Zhang; Richard Aviv; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI evaluates the early response of human head and neck tumor xenografts following anti-EMMPRIN therapy with cisplatin or irradiation.

Authors:  Hyunki Kim; Yolanda E Hartman; Guihua Zhai; Thomas K Chung; Melissa L Korb; Timothy M Beasley; Tong Zhou; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Imaging challenges of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with brain metastases: response, progression, and pseudoprogression.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Martin Kocher; Garry Ceccon; Jan-Michael Werner; Anna Brunn; Martina Deckert; Whitney B Pope; Riccardo Soffietti; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Weller; Jörg C Tonn; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Perfusion MRI as a diagnostic biomarker for differentiating glioma from brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chong Hyun Suh; Ho Sung Kim; Seung Chai Jung; Choong Gon Choi; Sang Joon Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Early posttreatment assessment of MRI perfusion biomarkers can predict long-term response of lung cancer brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Neil K Taunk; Jung Hun Oh; Amita Shukla-Dave; Kathryn Beal; Behroze Vachha; Andrei Holodny; Vaios Hatzoglou
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Diffusion and Perfusion MRI Predicts Response Preceding and Shortly After Radiosurgery to Brain Metastases: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Akash Deelip Shah; Amaresha Shridhar Konar; Ramesh Paudyal; Jung Hun Oh; Eve LoCastro; David Aramburu Nuñez; Nathaniel Swinburne; Behroze Vachha; Gary A Ulaner; Robert J Young; Andrei I Holodny; Kathryn Beal; Amita Shukla-Dave; Vaios Hatzoglou
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 9.  Quantitative Perfusion and Permeability Biomarkers in Brain Cancer from Tomographic CT and MR Images.

Authors:  Armin Eilaghi; Timothy Yeung; Christopher d'Esterre; Glenn Bauman; Slav Yartsev; Jay Easaw; Enrico Fainardi; Ting-Yim Lee; Richard Frayne
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2016-07-03

Review 10.  Diffusion and perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging for tumor volume definition in radiotherapy of brain tumors.

Authors:  Lu Guo; Gang Wang; Yuanming Feng; Tonggang Yu; Yu Guo; Xu Bai; Zhaoxiang Ye
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.