Literature DB >> 25022678

A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects.

Z Liu1, M E Goddard2, F Reinhardt3, R Reents3.   

Abstract

Compared with the currently widely used multi-step genomic models for genomic evaluation, single-step genomic models can provide more accurate genomic evaluation by jointly analyzing phenotypes and genotypes of all animals and can properly correct for the effect of genomic preselection on genetic evaluations. The objectives of this study were to introduce a single-step genomic model, allowing a direct estimation of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects, and to develop efficient computing algorithms for solving equations of the single-step SNP model. We proposed an alternative to the current single-step genomic model based on the genomic relationship matrix by including an additional step for estimating the effects of SNP markers. Our single-step SNP model allowed flexible modeling of SNP effects in terms of the number and variance of SNP markers. Moreover, our single-step SNP model included a residual polygenic effect with trait-specific variance for reducing inflation in genomic prediction. A kernel calculation of the SNP model involved repeated multiplications of the inverse of the pedigree relationship matrix of genotyped animals with a vector, for which numerical methods such as preconditioned conjugate gradients can be used. For estimating SNP effects, a special updating algorithm was proposed to separate residual polygenic effects from the SNP effects. We extended our single-step SNP model to general multiple-trait cases. By taking advantage of a block-diagonal (co)variance matrix of SNP effects, we showed how to estimate multivariate SNP effects in an efficient way. A general prediction formula was derived for candidates without phenotypes, which can be used for frequent, interim genomic evaluations without running the whole genomic evaluation process. We discussed various issues related to implementation of the single-step SNP model in Holstein populations with an across-country genomic reference population.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  dairy cattle; genomic prediction; mixed model equation; single-step SNP model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25022678     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-7924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  23 in total

1.  Incorporating the single-step strategy into a random regression model to enhance genomic prediction of longitudinal traits.

Authors:  H Kang; L Zhou; R Mrode; Q Zhang; J-F Liu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Factors affecting GEBV accuracy with single-step Bayesian models.

Authors:  Lei Zhou; Raphael Mrode; Shengli Zhang; Qin Zhang; Bugao Li; Jian-Feng Liu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Efficient single-step genomic evaluation for a multibreed beef cattle population having many genotyped animals.

Authors:  E A Mäntysaari; R D Evans; I Strandén
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Computational strategies for the preconditioned conjugate gradient method applied to ssSNPBLUP, with an application to a multivariate maternal model.

Authors:  Jeremie Vandenplas; Herwin Eding; Maarten Bosmans; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset.

Authors:  Mario P L Calus; Jérémie Vandenplas; Ina Hulsegge; Randy Borg; John M Henshall; Rachel Hawken
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects.

Authors:  Matti Taskinen; Esa A Mäntysaari; Ismo Strandén
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  On the equivalence between marker effect models and breeding value models and direct genomic values with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.

Authors:  Matias Bermann; Daniela Lourenco; Natalia S Forneris; Andres Legarra; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 5.100

8.  A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen; Michael E Goddard; Theo H E Meuwissen; Kathryn E Kemper; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Systematic genotyping of groups of cows to improve genomic estimated breeding values of selection candidates.

Authors:  Laura Plieschke; Christian Edel; Eduardo C G Pimentel; Reiner Emmerling; Jörn Bennewitz; Kay-Uwe Götz
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Inexpensive Computation of the Inverse of the Genomic Relationship Matrix in Populations with Small Effective Population Size.

Authors:  Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.