OBJECTIVE: Among children <13 years of age with persistent psychosis and contemporaneous decline in functioning, it is often difficult to determine if the diagnosis of childhood onset schizophrenia (COS) is warranted. Despite decades of experience, we have up to a 44% false positive screening diagnosis rate among patients identified as having probable or possible COS; final diagnoses are made following inpatient hospitalization and medication washout. Because our lengthy medication-free observation is not feasible in clinical practice, we constructed diagnostic classifiers using screening data to assist clinicians practicing in the community or academic centers. METHODS: We used cross-validation, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and random forest to determine the best algorithm for classifying COS (n=85) versus histories of psychosis and impaired functioning in children and adolescents who, at screening, were considered likely to have COS, but who did not meet diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia after medication washout and inpatient observation (n=53). We used demographics, clinical history measures, intelligence quotient (IQ) and screening rating scales, and number of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications as our predictors. RESULTS: Logistic regression models using nine, four, and two predictors performed well with positive predictive values>90%, overall accuracy>77%, and areas under the curve (AUCs)>86%. CONCLUSIONS: COS can be distinguished from alternate disorders with psychosis in children and adolescents; greater levels of positive and negative symptoms and lower levels of depression combine to make COS more likely. We include a worksheet so that clinicians in the community and academic centers can predict the probability that a young patient may be schizophrenic, using only two ratings.
OBJECTIVE: Among children <13 years of age with persistent psychosis and contemporaneous decline in functioning, it is often difficult to determine if the diagnosis of childhood onset schizophrenia (COS) is warranted. Despite decades of experience, we have up to a 44% false positive screening diagnosis rate among patients identified as having probable or possible COS; final diagnoses are made following inpatient hospitalization and medication washout. Because our lengthy medication-free observation is not feasible in clinical practice, we constructed diagnostic classifiers using screening data to assist clinicians practicing in the community or academic centers. METHODS: We used cross-validation, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and random forest to determine the best algorithm for classifying COS (n=85) versus histories of psychosis and impaired functioning in children and adolescents who, at screening, were considered likely to have COS, but who did not meet diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia after medication washout and inpatient observation (n=53). We used demographics, clinical history measures, intelligence quotient (IQ) and screening rating scales, and number of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications as our predictors. RESULTS: Logistic regression models using nine, four, and two predictors performed well with positive predictive values>90%, overall accuracy>77%, and areas under the curve (AUCs)>86%. CONCLUSIONS: COS can be distinguished from alternate disorders with psychosis in children and adolescents; greater levels of positive and negative symptoms and lower levels of depression combine to make COS more likely. We include a worksheet so that clinicians in the community and academic centers can predict the probability that a young patient may be schizophrenic, using only two ratings.
Authors: Guilherme Polanczyk; Terrie E Moffitt; Louise Arseneault; Mary Cannon; Antony Ambler; Richard S E Keefe; Renate Houts; Candice L Odgers; Avshalom Caspi Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-04
Authors: Christos Davatzikos; Dinggang Shen; Ruben C Gur; Xiaoying Wu; Dengfeng Liu; Yong Fan; Paul Hughett; Bruce I Turetsky; Raquel E Gur Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-11
Authors: K McKenna; C T Gordon; M Lenane; D Kaysen; K Fahey; J L Rapoport Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1994-06 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Uicheul Yoon; Jong-Min Lee; Kiho Im; Yong-Wook Shin; Baek Hwan Cho; In Young Kim; Jun Soo Kwon; Sun I Kim Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-12-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jeremy Horwood; Giovanni Salvi; Kate Thomas; Larisa Duffy; David Gunnell; Chris Hollis; Glyn Lewis; Paulo Menezes; Andrew Thompson; Dieter Wolke; Stanley Zammit; Glynn Harrison Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 9.319