Literature DB >> 25019450

MR imaging of hip arthroplasty implants.

Jan Fritz1, Brett Lurie, Theodore T Miller, Hollis G Potter.   

Abstract

Hip arthroplasty has become the standard treatment for end-stage hip disease, allowing pain relief and restoration of mobility in large numbers of patients; however, pain after hip arthroplasty occurs in as many as 40% of cases, and despite improved longevity, all implants eventually fail with time. Owing to the increasing numbers of hip arthroplasty procedures performed, the demographic factors, and the metal-on-metal arthroplasty systems with their associated risk for the development of adverse local tissue reactions to metal products, there is a growing demand for an accurate diagnosis of symptoms related to hip arthroplasty implants and for a way to monitor patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has evolved into a powerful diagnostic tool for the evaluation of hip arthroplasty implants. Optimized conventional pulse sequences and metal artifact reduction techniques afford improved depiction of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. Strategies for MR imaging of hip arthroplasty implants are presented, as well as the imaging appearances of common causes of painful and dysfunctional hip arthroplasty systems, including stress reactions and fractures; bone resorption and aseptic loosening; polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis; adverse local tissue reactions to metal products; infection; heterotopic ossification; tendinopathy; neuropathy; and periprosthetic neoplasms. A checklist is provided for systematic evaluation of MR images of hip arthroplasty implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and metal artifact reduction techniques is a comprehensive imaging modality for the evaluation of the hip after arthroplasty, contributing important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning. ©RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25019450     DOI: 10.1148/rg.344140010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  37 in total

1.  Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System.

Authors:  Rami Madanat; Daniel K Hussey; Gabrielle S Donahue; Hollis G Potter; Robert Wallace; Charles Bragdon; Orhun Muratoglu; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Component Loosening in THA?

Authors:  Alissa J Burge; Gabrielle P Konin; Jennifer L Berkowitz; Bin Lin; Matthew F Koff; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Imaging evaluation of polyethylene liner dissociation in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoshimi Endo; Christian Geannette; William T Chang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Comparative study of fat-suppression techniques for hip arthroplasty MR imaging.

Authors:  Sébastien Molière; Jean-Philippe Dillenseger; Matthieu Ehlinger; Stéphane Kremer; Guillaume Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Comparison of radiographs, tomosynthesis and CT with metal artifact reduction for the detection of hip prosthetic loosening.

Authors:  Romain Gillet; Pedro Teixeira; Chloé Bonarelli; Henry Coudane; François Sirveaux; Mathias Louis; Alain Blum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants.

Authors:  Jan Fritz; Brett Lurie; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Advanced metal artifact reduction MRI of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty implants: compressed sensing acceleration enables the time-neutral use of SEMAC.

Authors:  Jan Fritz; Benjamin Fritz; Gaurav K Thawait; Esther Raithel; Wesley D Gilson; Mathias Nittka; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Advanced MRI Techniques for the Hip Joint: Focus on the Postoperative Hip.

Authors:  Jennifer L Berkowitz; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty implants.

Authors:  Cesar de Cesar Netto; Lucas F Fonseca; Benjamin Fritz; Steven E Stern; Esther Raithel; Mathias Nittka; Lew C Schon; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.