BACKGROUND: The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques for pancreatic and liver operations remains ill defined. We sought to compare inpatient outcomes among patients undergoing open versus MIS pancreas and liver operations using a nationally representative cohort. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database for all major pancreatic and hepatic resections performed between 2000 and 2011. Appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) coding modifiers for laparoscopy and robotic assist were used to categorize procedures as MIS. Demographics, comorbidities, and inpatient outcomes were compared between the open and MIS groups. RESULTS: A total of 65,033 resections were identified (pancreas, n = 36,195 [55.7%]; liver, n = 28,035 [43.1%]; combined pancreas and liver, n = 803 [1.2%]). The overwhelming majority of operations were performed open (n = 62,192, 95.6%), whereas 4.4% (n = 2,841) were MIS. The overall use of MIS increased from 2.3% in 2000 to 7.5% in 2011. Compared with patients undergoing an open operation, MIS patients were older and had a greater incidence of multiple comorbid conditions. After operation, the incidence of complications for MIS (pancreas, 35.4%; liver, 29.5%) was lower than for open (pancreas, 41.6%; liver, 33%) procedures (all P < .05) resulting in a shorter median length of stay (8 vs 7 days; P = .001) as well as a lower in-hospital mortality (5.1% vs 2.8%; P = .001). CONCLUSION: During the last decade, the number of MIS pancreatic and hepatic operations has increased, with nearly 1 in 13 HPB cases now being performed via an MIS approach. Despite MIS patients tending to have more preoperative medical comorbidities, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and duration of stay compared favorably with open surgery.
BACKGROUND: The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques for pancreatic and liver operations remains ill defined. We sought to compare inpatient outcomes among patients undergoing open versus MIS pancreas and liver operations using a nationally representative cohort. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database for all major pancreatic and hepatic resections performed between 2000 and 2011. Appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) coding modifiers for laparoscopy and robotic assist were used to categorize procedures as MIS. Demographics, comorbidities, and inpatient outcomes were compared between the open and MIS groups. RESULTS: A total of 65,033 resections were identified (pancreas, n = 36,195 [55.7%]; liver, n = 28,035 [43.1%]; combined pancreas and liver, n = 803 [1.2%]). The overwhelming majority of operations were performed open (n = 62,192, 95.6%), whereas 4.4% (n = 2,841) were MIS. The overall use of MIS increased from 2.3% in 2000 to 7.5% in 2011. Compared with patients undergoing an open operation, MIS patients were older and had a greater incidence of multiple comorbid conditions. After operation, the incidence of complications for MIS (pancreas, 35.4%; liver, 29.5%) was lower than for open (pancreas, 41.6%; liver, 33%) procedures (all P < .05) resulting in a shorter median length of stay (8 vs 7 days; P = .001) as well as a lower in-hospital mortality (5.1% vs 2.8%; P = .001). CONCLUSION: During the last decade, the number of MIS pancreatic and hepatic operations has increased, with nearly 1 in 13 HPB cases now being performed via an MIS approach. Despite MIS patients tending to have more preoperative medical comorbidities, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and duration of stay compared favorably with open surgery.
Authors: Theresa A Lawrie; Lídia R F Medeiros; Daniela D Rosa; Maria Ines da Rosa; Maria I Edelweiss; Airton T Stein; Alice Zelmanowicz; Anaelena B Ethur; Roselaine R Zanini Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-02-28
Authors: Tao Jin; Kiran Altaf; Jun J Xiong; Wei Huang; Muhammad A Javed; Gang Mai; Xu B Liu; Wei M Hu; Qing Xia Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Jin He; Neda Amini; Gaya Spolverato; Kenzo Hirose; Martin Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Fabio Bagante; Gaya Spolverato; Steven M Strasberg; Faiz Gani; Vanessa Thompson; Bruce L Hall; David J Bentrem; Henry A Pitt; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Lapo Bencini; Mario Annecchiarico; Marco Farsi; Ilenia Bartolini; Vita Mirasolo; Francesco Guerra; Andrea Coratti Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2015-12-15
Authors: Ahmad Hamad; Jordan M Cloyd; Mary Dillhoff; Andrei Manilchuk; Timothy M Pawlik; Allan Tsung; Aslam Ejaz Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Yuhree Kim; Neda Amini; Jin He; Georgios A Margonis; Matthew Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Martin Makary; Kenzo Hirose; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Surgery Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Camille L Stewart; Philip H G Ituarte; Kurt A Melstrom; Susanne G Warner; Laleh G Melstrom; Lily L Lai; Yuman Fong; Yanghee Woo Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 4.584