Literature DB >> 25016586

The impact of biostimulation on the fate of sulfate and associated sulfur dynamics in groundwater.

Ziheng Miao1, Concepcion Carreón-Diazconti2, Kenneth C Carroll3, Mark L Brusseau4.   

Abstract

The impact of electron-donor addition on sulfur dynamics for a groundwater system with low levels of metal contaminants was evaluated with a pilot-scale biostimulation test conducted at a former uranium mining site. Geochemical and stable-isotope data collected before, during, and after the test were analyzed to evaluate the sustainability of sulfate reducing conditions induced by the test, the fate of hydrogen sulfide, and the impact on aqueous geochemical conditions. The results of site characterization activities conducted prior to the test indicated the absence of measurable bacterial sulfate reduction. The injection of an electron donor (ethanol) induced bacterial sulfate reduction, as confirmed by an exponential decrease of sulfate concentration in concert with changes in oxidation-reduction potential, redox species, alkalinity, production of hydrogen sulfide, and fractionation of δ(34)S-sulfate. High, stoichiometrically-equivalent hydrogen sulfide concentrations were not observed until several months after the start of the test. It is hypothesized that hydrogen sulfide produced from sulfate reduction was initially sequestered in the form of iron sulfides until the exhaustion of readily reducible iron oxides within the sediment. The fractionation of δ(34)S for sulfate was atypical, wherein the enrichment declined in the latter half of the experiment. It was conjectured that mixing effects associated with the release of sulfate from sulfate minerals associated with the sediments, along with possible sulfide re-oxidation contributed to this behavior. The results of this study illustrate the biogeochemical complexity that is associated with in-situ biostimulation processes involving bacterial sulfate reduction.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iron sulfide precipitation; Isotopic fractionation; Stable isotopes; Sulfate mineral dissolution; Sulfate reduction; Sulfide re-oxidation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25016586      PMCID: PMC4136432          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  25 in total

1.  34S/32S fractionation during sulfate reduction in groundwater treatment systems: reactive transport modeling.

Authors:  Blair D Gibson; Richard T Amos; David W Blowes
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Sulfate reduction in groundwater: characterization and applications for remediation.

Authors:  Z Miao; M L Brusseau; K C Carroll; C Carreón-Diazconti; B Johnson
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  TRANSPORT AND FATE OF AMMONIUM AND ITS IMPACT ON URANIUM AND OTHER TRACE ELEMENTS AT A FORMER URANIUM MILL TAILING SITE.

Authors:  Ziheng Miao; Hakan Nihat; Andrew Lee McMillan; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  Sulfur and oxygen isotope fractionation during benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene degradation by sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  Kay Knöller; Carsten Vogt; Hans-Herrmann Richnow; Stephan M Weise
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Removal of sulfate and heavy metals by sulfate reducing bacteria in short-term bench scale upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor runs.

Authors:  Tony Jong; David L Parry
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Changes in iron, sulfur, and arsenic speciation associated with bacterial sulfate reduction in ferrihydrite-rich systems.

Authors:  Samantha L Saalfield; Benjamin C Bostick
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  The influence of sulfur and iron on dissolved arsenic concentrations in the shallow subsurface under changing redox conditions.

Authors:  Peggy A O'Day; Dimitri Vlassopoulos; Robert Root; Nelson Rivera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Bioremoval of arsenic species from contaminated waters by sulphate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  Daniel Teclu; George Tivchev; Mark Laing; Mike Wallis
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Sulfur cycling and biodegradation in contaminated aquifers: insights from stable isotope investigations.

Authors:  Kay Knöller; Carsten Vogt; Stefan Feisthauer; Stephan M Weise; Holger Weiss; Hans-Hermann Richnow
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Arsenic bioremediation by biogenic iron oxides and sulfides.

Authors:  Enoma O Omoregie; Raoul-Marie Couture; Philippe Van Cappellen; Claire L Corkhill; John M Charnock; David A Polya; David Vaughan; Karolien Vanbroekhoven; Jonathan R Lloyd
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.