Literature DB >> 21947714

Sulfate reduction in groundwater: characterization and applications for remediation.

Z Miao1, M L Brusseau, K C Carroll, C Carreón-Diazconti, B Johnson.   

Abstract

Sulfate is ubiquitous in groundwater, with both natural and anthropogenic sources. Sulfate reduction reactions play a significant role in mediating redox conditions and biogeochemical processes for subsurface systems. They also serve as the basis for innovative in situ methods for groundwater remediation. An overview of sulfate reduction in subsurface environments is provided, along with a brief discussion of characterization methods and applications for addressing acid mine drainage. We then focus on two innovative, in situ methods for remediating sulfate-contaminated groundwater, the use of zero-valent iron and the addition of electron-donor substrates. The advantages and limitations associated with the methods are discussed, with examples of prior applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21947714      PMCID: PMC3575751          DOI: 10.1007/s10653-011-9423-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Geochem Health        ISSN: 0269-4042            Impact factor:   4.609


  47 in total

1.  In situ bioreduction of uranium (VI) to submicromolar levels and reoxidation by dissolved oxygen.

Authors:  Wei-Min Wu; Jack Carley; Jian Luo; Matthew A Ginder-Vogel; Erick Cardenas; Mary Beth Leigh; Chiachi Hwang; Shelly D Kelly; Chuanmin Ruan; Liyou Wu; Joy Van Nostrand; Terry Gentry; Kenneth Lowe; Tonia Mehlhorn; Sue Carroll; Wensui Luo; Matthew W Fields; Baohua Gu; David Watson; Kenneth M Kemner; Terence Marsh; James Tiedje; Jizhong Zhou; Scott Fendorf; Peter K Kitanidis; Philip M Jardine; Craig S Criddle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Modeling of microbial dynamics and geochemical changes in a metal bioprecipitation experiment.

Authors:  Henning Prommer; Michelle E Grassi; Alexander C Davis; Bradley M Patterson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Physiology and ecology of the sulphate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  G R Gibson
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1990-12

4.  Zero valent iron as an electron-donor for methanogenesis and sulfate reduction in anaerobic sludge.

Authors:  Srilakshmi Karri; Reyes Sierra-Alvarez; Jim A Field
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  In situ testing of metallic iron nanoparticle mobility and reactivity in a shallow granular aquifer.

Authors:  Peter Bennett; Feng He; Dongye Zhao; Brian Aiken; Lester Feldman
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.188

6.  Treatment of acid lignite mine flooding water by means of microbial sulfate reduction.

Authors:  F Glombitza
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.145

7.  Diversity and characterization of sulfate-reducing bacteria in groundwater at a uranium mill tailings site.

Authors:  Y J Chang; A D Peacock; P E Long; J R Stephen; J P McKinley; S J Macnaughton; A K Hussain; A M Saxton; D C White
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Sulfate Reduction at a Lignite Seam: Microbial Abundance and Activity.

Authors:  J. Detmers; U. Schulte; H. Strauss; J. Kuever
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Influence of nanoscale zero-valent iron on geochemical properties of groundwater and vinyl chloride degradation: A field case study.

Authors:  Yu-Ting Wei; Shian-Chee Wu; Chih-Ming Chou; Choi-Hong Che; Shin-Mu Tsai; Hsing-Lung Lien
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Microbial sulfate reduction and metal attenuation in pH 4 acid mine water.

Authors:  Clinton D Church; Richard T Wilkin; Charles N Alpers; Robert O Rye; R Blaine McCleskey
Journal:  Geochem Trans       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.737

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of Sulfate Reduction on Trichloroethene Dechlorination by Dehalococcoides-Containing Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Xinwei Mao; Alexandra Polasko; Lisa Alvarez-Cohen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Biotransformation of AFFF Component 6:2 Fluorotelomer Thioether Amido Sulfonate Generates 6:2 Fluorotelomer Thioether Carboxylate under Sulfate-Reducing Conditions.

Authors:  Shan Yi; Katie C Harding-Marjanovic; Erika F Houtz; Ying Gao; Jennifer E Lawrence; Rita V Nichiporuk; Anthony T Iavarone; Wei-Qin Zhuang; Martin Hansen; Jennifer A Field; David L Sedlak; Lisa Alvarez-Cohen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2018-04-04

3.  Characterization and quantification of groundwater sulfate sources at a mining site in an arid climate: The Monument Valley site in Arizona, USA.

Authors:  Ziheng Miao; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Hydrol (Amst)       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.722

4.  The impact of biostimulation on the fate of sulfate and associated sulfur dynamics in groundwater.

Authors:  Ziheng Miao; Concepcion Carreón-Diazconti; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.188

5.  Effects of dissolved organic phase composition and salinity on the engineered sulfate application in a flow-through system.

Authors:  Saeid Shafieiyoun; Riyadh I Al-Raoush; Reem Elfatih Ismail; Stephane K Ngueleu; Fereidoun Rezanezhad; Philippe Van Cappellen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  The Use of Polymer Membranes to Counteract the Risk of Environmental of Soil and Water Contamination.

Authors:  Anna Rabajczyk; Maria Zielecka; Krzysztof Cygańczuk; Łukasz Pastuszka; Leszek Jurecki
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.