Literature DB >> 25016297

Making models match measurements: model optimization for morphogen patterning networks.

J B Hengenius1, M Gribskov1, A E Rundell2, D M Umulis3.   

Abstract

Mathematical modeling of developmental signaling networks has played an increasingly important role in the identification of regulatory mechanisms by providing a sandbox for hypothesis testing and experiment design. Whether these models consist of an equation with a few parameters or dozens of equations with hundreds of parameters, a prerequisite to model-based discovery is to bring simulated behavior into agreement with observed data via parameter estimation. These parameters provide insight into the system (e.g., enzymatic rate constants describe enzyme properties). Depending on the nature of the model fit desired - from qualitative (relative spatial positions of phosphorylation) to quantitative (exact agreement of spatial position and concentration of gene products) - different measures of data-model mismatch are used to estimate different parameter values, which contain different levels of usable information and/or uncertainty. To facilitate the adoption of modeling as a tool for discovery alongside other tools such as genetics, immunostaining, and biochemistry, careful consideration needs to be given to how well a model fits the available data, what the optimized parameter values mean in a biological context, and how the uncertainty in model parameters and predictions plays into experiment design. The core discussion herein pertains to the quantification of model-to-data agreement, which constitutes the first measure of a model's performance and future utility to the problem at hand. Integration of this experimental data and the appropriate choice of objective measures of data-model agreement will continue to drive modeling forward as a tool that contributes to experimental discovery. The Drosophila melanogaster gap gene system, in which model parameters are optimized against in situ immunofluorescence intensities, demonstrates the importance of error quantification, which is applicable to a wide array of developmental modeling studies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental biology; Dynamic modeling; Mathematical modeling; Morphogens; Objective functions; Parameter estimation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25016297      PMCID: PMC4378650          DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol        ISSN: 1084-9521            Impact factor:   7.727


  43 in total

1.  A global parallel model based design of experiments method to minimize model output uncertainty.

Authors:  Jason N Bazil; Gregory T Buzzard; Ann E Rundell
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 2.  Biology by numbers: mathematical modelling in developmental biology.

Authors:  Claire J Tomlin; Jeffrey D Axelrod
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Mutual interaction in network motifs robustly sharpens gene expression in developmental processes.

Authors:  Shuji Ishihara; Tatsuo Shibata
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 4.  Quantitative model analysis with diverse biological data: applications in developmental pattern formation.

Authors:  Michael Pargett; David M Umulis
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.608

5.  Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen.

Authors:  W Driever; G Thoma; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner.

Authors:  W Driever; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Organism-scale modeling of early Drosophila patterning via bone morphogenetic proteins.

Authors:  David M Umulis; Osamu Shimmi; Michael B O'Connor; Hans G Othmer
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 12.270

8.  Control and function of terminal gap gene activity in the posterior pole region of the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  G Brönner; H Jäckle
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 9.  The gap gene network.

Authors:  Johannes Jaeger
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Canalization of gene expression and domain shifts in the Drosophila blastoderm by dynamical attractors.

Authors:  Svetlana Surkova; Alexander V Spirov; Vitaly V Gursky; Hilde Janssens; Ah-Ram Kim; Ovidiu Radulescu; Carlos E Vanario-Alonso; David H Sharp; Maria Samsonova; John Reinitz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  2 in total

1.  Acceleration of PDE-Based Biological Simulation Through the Development of Neural Network Metamodels.

Authors:  Lukasz Burzawa; Linlin Li; Xu Wang; Adrian Buganza-Tepole; David M Umulis
Journal:  Curr Pathobiol Rep       Date:  2020-11-06

2.  Systems biology derived source-sink mechanism of BMP gradient formation.

Authors:  Joseph Zinski; Ye Bu; Xu Wang; Wei Dou; David Umulis; Mary C Mullins
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 8.140

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.