Literature DB >> 23557990

Quantitative model analysis with diverse biological data: applications in developmental pattern formation.

Michael Pargett1, David M Umulis.   

Abstract

Mathematical modeling of transcription factor and signaling networks is widely used to understand if and how a mechanism works, and to infer regulatory interactions that produce a model consistent with the observed data. Both of these approaches to modeling are informed by experimental data, however, much of the data available or even acquirable are not quantitative. Data that is not strictly quantitative cannot be used by classical, quantitative, model-based analyses that measure a difference between the measured observation and the model prediction for that observation. To bridge the model-to-data gap, a variety of techniques have been developed to measure model "fitness" and provide numerical values that can subsequently be used in model optimization or model inference studies. Here, we discuss a selection of traditional and novel techniques to transform data of varied quality and enable quantitative comparison with mathematical models. This review is intended to both inform the use of these model analysis methods, focused on parameter estimation, and to help guide the choice of method to use for a given study based on the type of data available. Applying techniques such as normalization or optimal scaling may significantly improve the utility of current biological data in model-based study and allow greater integration between disparate types of data.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Data integration; Inference; Mathematical modeling; Normalization; Optimization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23557990     DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  9 in total

1.  Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Quantification for Systems Biology Models.

Authors:  Eshan D Mitra; William S Hlavacek
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2019-11-06

2.  Bayesian inference using qualitative observations of underlying continuous variables.

Authors:  Eshan D Mitra; William S Hlavacek
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Making models match measurements: model optimization for morphogen patterning networks.

Authors:  J B Hengenius; M Gribskov; A E Rundell; D M Umulis
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Systems biology derived source-sink mechanism of BMP gradient formation.

Authors:  Joseph Zinski; Ye Bu; Xu Wang; Wei Dou; David Umulis; Mary C Mullins
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Predicting network modules of cell cycle regulators using relative protein abundance statistics.

Authors:  Cihan Oguz; Layne T Watson; William T Baumann; John J Tyson
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2017-02-28

6.  Parameterization of mechanistic models from qualitative data using an efficient optimal scaling approach.

Authors:  Leonard Schmiester; Daniel Weindl; Jan Hasenauer
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 7.  Of mitogens and morphogens: modelling Sonic Hedgehog mechanisms in vertebrate development.

Authors:  Ian Groves; Marysia Placzek; Alexander G Fletcher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Model-based analysis for qualitative data: an application in Drosophila germline stem cell regulation.

Authors:  Michael Pargett; Ann E Rundell; Gregery T Buzzard; David M Umulis
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  PyBioNetFit and the Biological Property Specification Language.

Authors:  Eshan D Mitra; Ryan Suderman; Joshua Colvin; Alexander Ionkov; Andrew Hu; Herbert M Sauro; Richard G Posner; William S Hlavacek
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-08-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.