Ashley L Miller1, Lillian C Min2, Kathleen M Diehl3, David C Cron3, Chiao-Li Chan4, Kyle H Sheetz3, Michael N Terjimanian3, June A Sullivan3, William C Palazzolo3, Stewart C Wang3, Karen E Hall2, Michael J Englesbe3. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: ashmil@med.umich.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System and the Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (GRECC), Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Older patients account for nearly half of the United States surgical volume, and age alone is insufficient to predict surgical fitness. Various metrics exist for risk stratification, but little work has been done to describe the association between measures. We aimed to determine whether analytic morphomics, a novel objective risk assessment tool, correlates with functional measures currently recommended in the preoperative evaluation of older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 184 elective general surgery patients aged >70 y with both a preoperative computed tomography scan and Vulnerable Elderly Surgical Pathways and outcomes Assessment within 90 d of surgery. We used analytic morphomics to calculate trunk muscle size (or total psoas area [TPA]) and univariate logistic regression to assess the relationship between TPA and domains of geriatric function mobility, basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs), and cognitive ability. RESULTS: Greater TPA was inversely correlated with impaired mobility (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.85, P = 0.013). Greater TPA was associated with decreased odds of deficit in any basic ADLs (OR = 0.36 per standard deviation unit increase in TPA, 95% CI 0.15-0.87, P <0.03) and any instrumental ADLs (OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.81; P <0.005). Finally, patients with larger TPA were less likely to have cognitive difficulty assessed by Mini-Cog scale (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.86, P <0.01). Controlling for age did not change results. CONCLUSIONS: Older surgical candidates with greater trunk muscle size, or greater TPA, are less likely to have physical impairment, cognitive difficulty, or decreased ability to perform daily self-care. Further research linking these assessments to clinical outcomes is needed.
BACKGROUND: Older patients account for nearly half of the United States surgical volume, and age alone is insufficient to predict surgical fitness. Various metrics exist for risk stratification, but little work has been done to describe the association between measures. We aimed to determine whether analytic morphomics, a novel objective risk assessment tool, correlates with functional measures currently recommended in the preoperative evaluation of older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 184 elective general surgery patients aged >70 y with both a preoperative computed tomography scan and Vulnerable Elderly Surgical Pathways and outcomes Assessment within 90 d of surgery. We used analytic morphomics to calculate trunk muscle size (or total psoas area [TPA]) and univariate logistic regression to assess the relationship between TPA and domains of geriatric function mobility, basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs), and cognitive ability. RESULTS: Greater TPA was inversely correlated with impaired mobility (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.85, P = 0.013). Greater TPA was associated with decreased odds of deficit in any basic ADLs (OR = 0.36 per standard deviation unit increase in TPA, 95% CI 0.15-0.87, P <0.03) and any instrumental ADLs (OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.81; P <0.005). Finally, patients with larger TPA were less likely to have cognitive difficulty assessed by Mini-Cog scale (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.86, P <0.01). Controlling for age did not change results. CONCLUSIONS: Older surgical candidates with greater trunk muscle size, or greater TPA, are less likely to have physical impairment, cognitive difficulty, or decreased ability to perform daily self-care. Further research linking these assessments to clinical outcomes is needed.
Authors: Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: J Riley McCarten; Pauline Anderson; Michael A Kuskowski; Susan E McPherson; Soo Borson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Martin A Makary; Dorry L Segev; Peter J Pronovost; Dora Syin; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Purvi Patel; Ryan Takenaga; Lara Devgan; Christine G Holzmueller; Jing Tian; Linda P Fried Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Thomas N Robinson; Ben Eiseman; Jeffrey I Wallace; Skotti D Church; Kim K McFann; Shirley M Pfister; Terra J Sharp; Marc Moss Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Trevor Williams; Brian C Gulack; Sunghee Kim; Felix G Fernandez; Mark K Ferguson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Carrie A Kubiak; Kavitha Ranganathan; Niki Matusko; Jon A Jacobson; Stewart C Wang; Pauline K Park; Benjamin L Levi Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Ashley L Miller; Michael J Englesbe; Kathleen M Diehl; Chiao-Li Chan; David C Cron; Brian A Derstine; William C Palazzolo; Karen E Hall; Stewart C Wang; Lillian C Min Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kyle J Lafata; Mustafa R Bashir; Mariana R DeFreitas; Amadu Toronka; Marybeth A Nedrud; Sarah Cubberley; Islam H Zaki; Brandon Konkel; Hope E Uronis; Manisha Palta; Dan G Blazer Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2022-10-09
Authors: Lillian Min; Lauren Mazzurco; Tanya R Gure; Christine T Cigolle; Pearl Lee; Cathie Bloem; Chiao-Li Chan; Matthew A Romano; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Kenneth M Langa; Richard L Prager; Preeti N Malani Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Amit G Singal; Peng Zhang; Akbar K Waljee; Lakshmi Ananthakrishnan; Neehar D Parikh; Pratima Sharma; Pranab Barman; Venkataramu Krishnamurthy; Lu Wang; Stewart C Wang; Grace L Su Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 4.488