Anne Elixhauser1, Roxanne M Andrews. 1. Center for Delivery, Organization, and Markets, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA. anne.elixhauser@ahrq.hhs.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of inpatient operating room (OR) procedures in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample discharge data from a sample of US short-term, acute-care, nonfederal hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: National volume of OR procedures overall and by type of procedure, resource use and costs, most frequent and expensive procedures, and trends. RESULTS: Fifteen million OR procedures were performed in 2007 (495 procedures/10 000 population). Only 26.4% of hospitalizations involved an OR procedure; however, OR-related stays were responsible for 46.8% of hospital costs ($161 billion). Patients aged 65 years and older were 2 to 3 times more likely to experience OR procedures (eg, 1327 procedures/10 000 persons among those aged 65-84 years vs 626 procedures/10 000 persons for those aged 45-64 years). Compared with non-OR inpatients, OR patients were less severely ill (20.5% had the highest severity of illness vs 24.6% for non-OR patients) and used more resources ($2900/day for OR patients vs $1400/day for non-OR patients). The 15 most expensive procedures accounted for half of all procedure-related hospitalization costs and one-fourth of total hospital costs. Volumes for 4 of the most expensive procedures increased between 1997 and 2007: 20% for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 46% for cesarean delivery, 46% for knee replacement, and 45% for spinal fusion. The volume of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty declined 20% from 2006 to 2007, compared with a 56% increase in the prior decade. CONCLUSIONS: Procedures in the OR represent a large portion of hospital costs, and these costs are concentrated in few procedure types.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of inpatient operating room (OR) procedures in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample discharge data from a sample of US short-term, acute-care, nonfederal hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: National volume of OR procedures overall and by type of procedure, resource use and costs, most frequent and expensive procedures, and trends. RESULTS: Fifteen million OR procedures were performed in 2007 (495 procedures/10 000 population). Only 26.4% of hospitalizations involved an OR procedure; however, OR-related stays were responsible for 46.8% of hospital costs ($161 billion). Patients aged 65 years and older were 2 to 3 times more likely to experience OR procedures (eg, 1327 procedures/10 000 persons among those aged 65-84 years vs 626 procedures/10 000 persons for those aged 45-64 years). Compared with non-OR inpatients, OR patients were less severely ill (20.5% had the highest severity of illness vs 24.6% for non-OR patients) and used more resources ($2900/day for OR patients vs $1400/day for non-OR patients). The 15 most expensive procedures accounted for half of all procedure-related hospitalization costs and one-fourth of total hospital costs. Volumes for 4 of the most expensive procedures increased between 1997 and 2007: 20% for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 46% for cesarean delivery, 46% for knee replacement, and 45% for spinal fusion. The volume of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty declined 20% from 2006 to 2007, compared with a 56% increase in the prior decade. CONCLUSIONS: Procedures in the OR represent a large portion of hospital costs, and these costs are concentrated in few procedure types.
Authors: Brian A Hargreaves; Pauline W Worters; Kim Butts Pauly; John M Pauly; Kevin M Koch; Garry E Gold Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Hans F Stabenau; Robert D Becher; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Linda Leo-Summers; Heather G Allore; Thomas M Gill Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Juan Mata; Nicolò Pecorelli; Pepa Kaneva; Dan Moldoveanu; Alexandre Gosselin-Tardiff; Mohsen Alhashemi; Stephan Robitaille; Saba Balvardi; Lawrence Lee; Barry L Stein; Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Julio F Fiore; Liane S Feldman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-05-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ashley L Miller; Lillian C Min; Kathleen M Diehl; David C Cron; Chiao-Li Chan; Kyle H Sheetz; Michael N Terjimanian; June A Sullivan; William C Palazzolo; Stewart C Wang; Karen E Hall; Michael J Englesbe Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Pauline W Worters; Kyunghyun Sung; Kathryn J Stevens; Kevin M Koch; Brian A Hargreaves Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-07-12 Impact factor: 4.813