| Literature DB >> 25015735 |
Mi-Ra Oh, Soo-Hyun Park, Sun-Young Kim, Hyang-Im Back, Min-Gul Kim, Ji-Young Jeon, Ki-Chan Ha, Won-Taek Na, Youn-Soo Cha, Byung-Hyun Park, Tae-sun Park1, Soo-Wan Chae.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Red ginseng is prepared by steaming raw ginseng, a process believed to increase the pharmacological efficacy. Further bioconversion of red ginseng through fermentation is known to increase its intestinal absorption and bioactivity, and bioconversion diminishes the toxicity of red ginseng's metabolite. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of daily supplementation with fermented red ginseng (FRG) on glycemic status in subjects with impaired fasting glucose or type 2 diabetes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25015735 PMCID: PMC4227112 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Ginsenoside profile of the FRG
| Rg1 | 0.30 | 0.12 |
| Re | 0.30 | 0.35 |
| Rb1 | 0.65 | 0.33 |
| Rb2 + Rc | 0.28 | 0.50 |
| Rd | 0.02 | 0.24 |
| Rg3 | 0.09 | 0.19 |
| Rh2 | 0.08 | 0.13 |
| Compound K | 0.05 | 0.49 |
| Total | 1.77 | 2.35 |
*Determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Figure 1Disposition of participants in the clinical trial of FRG versus placebo. Number of study participants enrolled, allocated, followed, and analyzed, shown using the CONSORT 2010 Flow Diagram.
Study participant demographic characteristics
| Sex (M/F) | 15/6 | 13/8 | 0.5132) |
| Age (years) | 53.5 ± 1.9 | 53.2 ± 1.8 | 0.914 |
| Height (cm) | 165.0 ± 1.8 | 166.6 ± 1.4 | 0.477 |
| Weight (kg) | 67.5 ± 2.4 | 68.9 ± 1.8 | 0.646 |
| Waist (cm) | 91.1 ± 1.7 | 93.0 ± 1.3 | 0.406 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.9 ± 0.8 | 24.9 ± 0.7 | 1.000 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) | 6.4 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 0.737 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.8 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.2 | 0.121 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 0.414 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 0.170 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 0.928 |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. 1)Analyzed by independent t-tests and the p-value represents the comparison to the placebo group. 2)Analyzed by Chi-square tests. BMI: body mass index.
Effect of FRG supplementation on postprandial glucose and insulin levels
| | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) | 6.4 ± 0.61 | 6.3 ± 0.6 | NS | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 6.1 ± 0.6 | 0.039 | NS |
| Postprandial plasma glucose2h (mmol/l) | 9.0 ± 2.1 | 8.5 ± 1.9 | NS | 9.3 ± 2.2 | 7.7 ± 1.9 | 0.0001 | 0.008 |
| AUCglucose (mmol/l) | 18.4 ± 0.7 | 17.3 ± 0.7 | 0.045 | 18.6 ± 0.7 | 13.5 ± 1.6 | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Fasting plasma insulin (μU/ml) | 7.4 ± 0.9 | 6.9 ± 0.6 | NS | 7.3 ± 1.0 | 9.0 ± 1.3 | NS | NS |
| Postprandial plasma insulin2h (μU/ml) | 38.1 ± 3.9 | 35.5 ± 4.1 | NS | 39.2 ± 5.6 | 56.3 ± 9.8 | NS | 0.040 |
1)Analyzed by linear mixed-effect model and the p-value represents the comparison to the baseline visit. 2)Analyzed by linear mixed-effect model and the p-value represents the comparison to the placebo group. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 2The effect of FRG supplementation on glucose levels during meal tolerance tests. Data are shown as mean ± SEM for 21 subjects. **p < 0.01 vs. placebo at four weeks.
Effect of FRG supplementation on lipid levels
| | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.2 | NS | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 0.008 | NS |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.022 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.014 | NS |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 0.005 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 0.025 | NS |
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | NS | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | NS | NS |
1)Analyzed by linear mixed effect model and p-value represents the comparison to the baseline visit. 2)Analyzed by linear mixed effect model and p-value represents the comparison to the placebo group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.