Literature DB >> 25014630

Development of response activation and inhibition in a selective stop-signal task.

Maria C van de Laar1, Wery P M van den Wildenberg2, Geert J M van Boxtel3, Maurits W van der Molen4.   

Abstract

To gain more insight into the development of action control, the current brain potential study examined response selection, activation, and selective inhibition during choice- and stop-signal processing in three age groups (8-, 12-, and 21-year-olds). Results revealed that age groups differed in the implementation of proactive control; children slowed their go response and showed reduced cortical motor output compared to adults. On failed inhibition trials, children were less able than adults to suppress muscle output resulting in increased partial-inhibition rates. On invalid stop trials, all age groups initially activated, subsequently inhibited, and then reactivated the go response. Yet, children were less efficient in implementing this strategy. Then, older children recruit motor responses to a greater extent than younger children and adults, which reduced the efficiency of implementing response inhibition and proactive control. The results are discussed in relation to current notions of developmental change in proactive and reactive action control.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Development; EMG; Laplacian ERPs; Response activation; Response inhibition; Selective inhibition

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25014630     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  7 in total

Review 1.  Neural Substrates of Inhibitory Control Maturation in Adolescence.

Authors:  Christos Constantinidis; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Reach tracking reveals dissociable processes underlying inhibitory control in 5- to 10-year-olds and adults.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; Jeff Moher; Joo-Hyun Song; David M Sobel
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-02-24

3.  Common and Unique Inhibitory Control Signatures of Action-Stopping and Attentional Capture Suggest That Actions Are Stopped in Two Stages.

Authors:  Joshua R Tatz; Cheol Soh; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Partial response electromyography as a marker of action stopping.

Authors:  Liisa Raud; Christina Thunberg; René J Huster
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 5.  Neurobehavioral maturation of motor response inhibition in adolescence - A narrative review.

Authors:  Hannah Weiss; Monica Luciana
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 9.052

6.  Pediatric OCD in the era of RDoC.

Authors:  Sarah L Garnaat; Christine A Conelea; Nicole C R McLaughlin; Kristen Benito
Journal:  J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 1.677

7.  When holding your horses meets the deer in the headlights: time-frequency characteristics of global and selective stopping under conditions of proactive and reactive control.

Authors:  Christina F Lavallee; Marie T Meemken; Christoph S Herrmann; Rene J Huster
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.