Literature DB >> 25013271

Scapulothoracic Muscle Activity during Use of a Wall Slide Device (WSD), a Comparison with the General Wall Push up Plus.

Se-Yeon Park1, Tae-Kyung Ahn2, Ji-Hwan Eom2, Hyun-Ji Youn2, In-Kwang Kim2, Won-Gyu Yoo3.   

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the wall slide device on activation of the scapulothoracic musculature. [Subjects] We recruited 15 healthy male subjects. [Methods] The subjects performed the general wall push-up plus (WPUP) and the wall slide with device (WSD) exercises. During the exercises, the muscle activities of the upper and lower trapezius (UT, LT), middle and lower serratus anterior (MSA, LSA), and pectoralis major (PM) were measured.
[Results] The normalized muscle activity data of the WSD were significantly higher in UT, MSA and LSA than the WPUP.
[Conclusion] Our results suggest that exercise using the WSD can more effectively activate the scapulothoracic musculature than the general WPUP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise; Serratus anterior; Upper extremity

Year:  2014        PMID: 25013271      PMCID: PMC4085196          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

Abnormal scapular alignment and kinematics during arm elevation, disturbs normal shoulder kinematics1, 2). Therefore in rehabilitation, retraining the scapulothoracic musculature is necessary for regaining normal alignment of the shoulder girdle and for functional shoulder movement1,2,3). Closed kinetic chain exercises for the upper extremity are known to activate both the scapulothoracic and shoulder musculatures3, 4). A recent finding suggested that the wall push up plus exercise is an appropriate closed kinetic exercise for those requiring low-level strengthening exercise5). However, the general wall push up plus exercise is unable to stimulate proprioception of the shoulder joint receptors due to reduced tension, and simply introducing scapular protraction movement is questionable, since it is a less functional exercise than excises including an arm elevation component6). In clinical practice, there are few devices for activating the musculature of the upper extremity. Although the shoulder press, pull down, and cross cable device are common exercise machine, these devices are not portable, and are not easy for individual to adjust patients. Therefore, the present study investigated the effect of a newly developed device which provides tensile resistance and induces an arm elevation component to scapulothoracic exercise.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Fifteen male subjects who were right-arm dominant participated in this study. They were aged 20 to 26 years (21.9±2.8), and their mean height and weight were 174.9±0.0 cm, and 66.5±5.3 kg, respectively. Subjects were excluded if they had a history of upper extremity injury within the last 6 months. Each subject provided his informed consent before participation in this study. This study was approved by the Inje University Faculty of Health Sciences Human Ethics Committee. Electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the upper trapezius (UT), lower trapezius (LT), middle serratus anterior (MSA), lower serratus anterior (LSA), and pectoralis major (PM) were performed using a Trigno wireless system (Delsys, Boston, MA, USA). Electrode placements and the procedure for measuring maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) were followed recommendations in the literature7, 8). We designed a wall slide device (WSD), which is an adaptation of the standard push up bar. We added four wheels to the base to provide instability and reduce friction. Handle bars are connected to the trunk belt by a detachable Theraband (Fig. 1). Each subject performed three trials of general wall push-up plus (WPUP) and wall slide with device (WSD) exercises. In the WPUP, subjects stood at arms length from the wall, and pushed against the wall to push their back backward maximally. In the WSD exercise, subjects grasped the WSD bar and elevated the arm from 90° to 120°. The two exercises were performed in a random order. Three minutes of rest time were allowed between trials. Three seconds of EMG data during the exercises were analyzed and then averaged. The data were expressed as % MVC to normalize the data3). The paired t-test was conducted to examine the significance of differences. Significance was accepted for values of p<0.05, and SPSS version 18.0 was used for statistical analyses.
Fig. 1.

Wall slide device (A: Initial posture, B: Terminal posture)

Wall slide device (A: Initial posture, B: Terminal posture)

RESULTS

During the WSD exercise, the averaged %MVC data of UT, MSA, and LSA were 25.2±17.5, 63.5±31.4, and 56.4±16.7, respectively. The %MVC data of the WSD were significantly higher than those of the WPUP (p<0.05), which were 10.4±13 for UT, 43.1±16 for MSA, and 38±16.3 for LSA. There were no significant differences in %MVC data of LT and PM between the WPUP (11.6±12.5 for LT, 12.3±12.9 for PM) and the WSD (16.1±18.79 for LT, 9±5.61 for PM) exercises (p>0.05).

DISCUSSION

A previous study categorized the level of %MVC into 4 levels: low, 0–20%; moderate, 21–40%; high, 41–60%; very high, > 60%9). Following this criteria, the WPUP of our present induced moderate levels of muscle activation in MSA and LSA. While WSD induced a moderate level of UT activation as well as high levels of MSA and LSA activation. This suggests that the newly designed WSD exercise activates the scapulothoracic musculature more efficiently and more harmoniously than the WPUP. Although some previous reports have cautioned against excessive activation of the UT5, 7), it contributes to upward rotation of the scapulae, and one previous study demonstrated that loss of UT function causes reduced scapular upward rotation10). In the case of a patient with shoulder disability, strengthening exercises are necessary for regaining upper extremity function. Although previous studies have suggested using unstable surfaces and changes of body position to increase muscular activation7, 11), providing controlled resistance and inducing functional movement cannot be easily adjusted to suit the patients. The newly designed WSD includes wheels to reduce friction resistance during the wall slide exercise, and resistance to raising the arms can be easily controlled by changing the length or type of Theraband. Futher comparisons of the WSD exercise with other exercise devices and exercise methods are required. Our present results suggest that exercise using the WSD can more effectively activate the scapulothoraic musculature than the general WPUP.
  10 in total

1.  Serratus anterior muscle activity during selected rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  M J Decker; R A Hintermeister; K J Faber; R J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Relative balance of serratus anterior and upper trapezius muscle activity during push-up exercises.

Authors:  Paula M Ludewig; Molly S Hoff; Erin E Osowski; Shane A Meschke; Peter J Rundquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Scapular muscle activity in overhead athletes with symptoms of secondary shoulder impingement during closed chain exercises.

Authors:  W Steven Tucker; Charles W Armstrong; Phillip A Gribble; Mark K Timmons; Richard A Yeasting
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Quantifying muscle patterns and spine load during various forms of the push-up.

Authors:  Stephanie Freeman; Amy Karpowicz; John Gray; Stuart McGill
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 5.  The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function.

Authors:  W B Kibler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  An electromyographic analysis of the upper extremity in pitching.

Authors:  N M Digiovine; F W Jobe; M Pink; J Perry
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Differential activation of parts of the serratus anterior muscle during push-up variations on stable and unstable bases of support.

Authors:  Se-yeon Park; Won-gyu Yoo
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Shoulder impingement: biomechanical considerations in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Paula M Ludewig; Jonathan P Braman
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2011-02

9.  Shoulder kinematics during the wall push-up plus exercise.

Authors:  Jason B Lunden; Jonathan P Braman; Robert F Laprade; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Subacromial impingement syndrome as a consequence of botulinum therapy to the upper trapezii: a case report.

Authors:  Zachary Abbott; James K Richardson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.966

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The effects of exercise type and elbow angle on vertical ground reaction force and muscle activity during a push-up plus exercise.

Authors:  Jun G San Juan; David N Suprak; Sean M Roach; Marc Lyda
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Strength and muscle activity of shoulder external rotation of subjects with and without scapular dyskinesis.

Authors:  Daisuke Uga; Rie Nakazawa; Masaaki Sakamoto
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-04-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.