Literature DB >> 20382286

Scapular muscle activity in overhead athletes with symptoms of secondary shoulder impingement during closed chain exercises.

W Steven Tucker1, Charles W Armstrong, Phillip A Gribble, Mark K Timmons, Richard A Yeasting.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the amount of muscle activation in 4 scapular muscles in overhead athletes with and without a history of secondary shoulder impingement, during 3 upper extremity closed chain exercises.
DESIGN: One-between (group), one-within (exercise) repeated measures.
SETTING: Controlled laboratory study. PARTICIPANTS: Overhead athletes (n=15; mean age +/- SD, 21.0+/-2.5 y; mean height +/- SD, 176.0+/-7.8 cm; mean weight +/- SD, 76.1+/-13.4 kg) demonstrating with symptoms of shoulder impingement and overhead athletes (n=15; mean age +/- SD, 20.4+/-3.8 y; mean height +/- SD, 174.1+/-9.7 cm; mean weight +/- SD, 73.3+/-11.7 kg) with no shoulder pathologies.
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects completed 5 individual trials of a standard push-up, a push-up on an unstable surface, and a revolution on a shoulder rehabilitation device while electromyography (EMG) recorded muscle activity of the serratus anterior, upper trapezius, middle trapezius, and lower trapezius. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean EMG data for the 4 muscles from the standard push-up, push-up on an unstable surface, and shoulder rehabilitation device trials were normalized as a percentage of a maximum voluntary isometric contraction for each muscle.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant interaction for the middle trapezius (F(2,56)=3.856; P=.027). The shoulder impingement push-up on an unstable surface (33.76%+/-26.45%) had significantly greater activation compared with the shoulder impingement standard push-up (25.88%+/-13.76%), the shoulder impingement shoulder rehabilitation device (9.40%+/-5.86%), and the nonpathology push-up on an unstable surface (19.49%+/-7.73%). The shoulder impingement standard push-up had significantly greater activation compared with the shoulder impingement shoulder rehabilitation device and nonpathology standard push-up (17.99%+/-7.31%). The nonpathology standard push-up and nonpathology push-up on an unstable surface had significantly greater activation compared with the nonpathology shoulder rehabilitation device (7.95%+/-4.30%).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the muscle activation of the middle trapezius differs in overhead athletes with a history of secondary shoulder impingement compared with those who lack this history during closed chain exercise, as well as within the 3 closed chain exercises. The levels of muscle activation of the serratus anterior and upper trapezius during these closed chain exercises were similar between the 2 groups. These results support the use of closed chain exercises in the rehabilitation process of overhead athletes with secondary shoulder impingement. However, clinicians should consider the muscle(s) of interest when selecting an exercise. Copyright 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382286     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  13 in total

Review 1.  Electromyographic activity of the shoulder muscles during rehabilitation exercises in subjects with and without subacromial pain syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rita Kinsella; Tania Pizzari
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-08-13

2.  Serratus anterior and lower trapezius muscle activities during multi-joint isotonic scapular exercises and isometric contractions.

Authors:  Masaaki Tsuruike; Todd S Ellenbecker
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Electromyographic analysis of the serratus anterior and upper trapezius in closed kinetic chain exercises performed on different unstable support surfaces: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillermo Mendez-Rebolledo; Ignacio Orozco-Chavez; Juan Morales-Verdugo; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Ann M J Cools
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Electromyographic study of neck muscle activity according to head position in rugby tackles.

Authors:  Koji Morimoto; Masaaki Sakamoto; Takashi Fukuhara; Kazuo Kato
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-06-29

5.  Effects of Push-up Exercise with Hip Adduction on the COP Deviation and the Serratus Anterior and L1 Paraspinal Muscles.

Authors:  Min-Hee Kim; Won-Gyu Yoo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-08-20

6.  Effect of a Multi-Air-Cushion Biofeedback Device (MABD) on Shoulder Muscles during the Dynamic Hug Exercise.

Authors:  Won-Gyu Yoo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-08-20

7.  The effect of exercise types for rotator cuff repair patients on activities of shoulder muscles and upper limb disability.

Authors:  Jeong-Il Kang; Young-Jun Moon; Hyun Choi; Dae-Keun Jeong; Hye-Min Kwon; Jun-Su Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-10-28

Review 8.  Optimal management of shoulder impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Rafael F Escamilla; Todd R Hooks; Kevin E Wilk
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2014-02-28

9.  Scapulothoracic Muscle Activity during Use of a Wall Slide Device (WSD), a Comparison with the General Wall Push up Plus.

Authors:  Se-Yeon Park; Tae-Kyung Ahn; Ji-Hwan Eom; Hyun-Ji Youn; In-Kwang Kim; Won-Gyu Yoo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-06-30

10.  The effect of an active vibration stimulus according to different shoulder joint angles on functional reach and stability of the shoulder joint.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Kim; Seong-Gil Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.