Literature DB >> 25013153

Detecting clinically-relevant changes in progressive multiple sclerosis.

L V A E Bosma1, J M Sonder1, J J Kragt2, C H Polman1, B M J Uitdehaag3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate which changes in different clinical outcome measures contribute most to increased disease impact, as reported by the patient, in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS).
METHODS: From a cohort of prospectively-followed MS patients, we selected progressive patients with two visits, 4-6 years apart. We assessed long-term changes on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) and Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS). We defined the presence or absence of clinically meaningful change by using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) as an anchor measure. We also studied change on recently identified sub-scales of GNDS.
RESULTS: Change on GNDS (especially the spinal-plus subscale) contributed most to increased disease impact. Also change on the T25FW contributed largely. Specific profiles of change in T25FW and MSIS seemed to exist (generally, a lower increase in disease impact in patients with longer disease duration and higher baseline impact/disability). In some patients a dissociation existed between increased impact, according to the MSIS-29, and objective physical worsening of the T25FW.
CONCLUSION: These results support using GNDS (particularly the spinal-plus domain) and T25FW in outcome measurement in progressive MS. We suggest there is a relation between baseline clinical characteristics and an increased impact at follow-up. This may have implications for patient selection in trials for progressive MS.
© The Author(s), 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome; disability tests; disease progression; multiple sclerosis; outcome measurement; patient reported outcome; study design

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25013153     DOI: 10.1177/1352458514540969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  12 in total

1.  Group cognitive rehabilitation to reduce the psychological impact of multiple sclerosis on quality of life: the CRAMMS RCT.

Authors:  Nadina B Lincoln; Lucy E Bradshaw; Cris S Constantinescu; Florence Day; Avril Er Drummond; Deborah Fitzsimmons; Shaun Harris; Alan A Montgomery; Roshan das Nair
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  T Ziemssen; S Rauer; C Stadelmann; T Henze; J Koehler; I-K Penner; M Lang; D Poehlau; M Baier-Ebert; H Schieb; S Meuth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Analysis of the psychometric properties of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis using classical and modern test theory.

Authors:  E D Bacci; K W Wyrwich; G A Phillips; T Vollmer; S Guo
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2016-10-09

4.  Comparative utility of disability progression measures in PPMS: Analysis of the PROMiSe data set.

Authors:  Marcus W Koch; Gary R Cutter; Gavin Giovannoni; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Jerry S Wolinsky; Mat D Davis; Joshua R Steinerman; Volker Knappertz
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2017-05-10

5.  Patient-reported outcomes and survival in multiple sclerosis: A 10-year retrospective cohort study using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29.

Authors:  Joel Raffel; Alison Wallace; Djordje Gveric; Richard Reynolds; Tim Friede; Richard Nicholas
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Exploring cued and non-cued motor imagery interventions in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised feasibility trial and reliability study.

Authors:  Barbara Seebacher; Raija Kuisma; Angela Glynn; Thomas Berger
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2018-03-02

7.  Greater sensitivity to multiple sclerosis disability worsening and progression events using a roving versus a fixed reference value in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ludwig Kappos; Helmut Butzkueven; Heinz Wiendl; Timothy Spelman; Fabio Pellegrini; Yi Chen; Qunming Dong; Harold Koendgen; Shibeshih Belachew; Maria Trojano
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Applying causal models to explore the mechanism of action of simvastatin in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Arman Eshaghi; Rogier A Kievit; Ferran Prados; Carole H Sudre; Jennifer Nicholas; M Jorge Cardoso; Dennis Chan; Richard Nicholas; Sebastien Ourselin; John Greenwood; Alan J Thompson; Daniel C Alexander; Frederik Barkhof; Jeremy Chataway; Olga Ciccarelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Should We Use Clinical Tools to Identify Disease Progression?

Authors:  Hernan Inojosa; Undine Proschmann; Katja Akgün; Tjalf Ziemssen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Rhythmic cued motor imagery and walking in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Barbara Seebacher; Raija Kuisma; Angela Glynn; Thomas Berger
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2015-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.