Literature DB >> 25012145

Application of a toxicity test battery integrated index for a first screening of the ecotoxicological threat posed by ports and harbors in the southern Adriatic Sea (Italy).

Sonia Manzo1, Simona Schiavo, Pellumb Aleksi, Afrim Tabaku.   

Abstract

Ports and harbors may represent a threat for coastal ecosystems due to pollutant inputs, especially those derived from maritime activities. In this study, we report a first assessment of the ecotoxicological threat posed by six ports and harbors of opposite coastal regions, Apulia and Albania, in the southern Adriatic Sea (Italy). A bioassay battery consisting of four different species representing different trophic levels, algae Dunaliella tertiolecta, bacteria Vibrio fischeri, crustacean Artemia salina, and echinoids Paracentrotus lividus, has been used to assess sediment elutriates, pore waters, and sediment suspensions. Two different approaches of toxicity data integration, worst case and integrated index, have been used to determine the most appropriate procedure for the investigated sites. All sites with the worst case approach showed high toxicity levels. The chronic test with algae was the most sensitive identifying the highest effects in the battery. This effect can be attributable to contaminants derived from antifouling paints. The sediments, evaluated with V. fischeri test, often showed toxicity not found in the aqueous matrices of the same sites and that can be mainly linked to organic compounds. The test battery used in this study allowed us to perform a preliminary screening of the ecotoxicological risk of the studied area. In fact, the species utilized for toxicity tests responded differently to the investigated samples, showing different sensitivity. The test battery integrated index did not allow highlighting the differences among the sites and showed a general high ecotoxicological risk. A larger number of tests with higher sensitivity together with a tailored attribution of weights to endpoints and matrices will improve the final site evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25012145     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-3915-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  36 in total

1.  Seasonal variability in the concentrations of Irgarol 1051 in Brighton Marina, UK; including the impact of dredging.

Authors:  J C Bowman; J W Readman; J L Zhou
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Chronic toxicity of arsenic to the Great Salt Lake brine shrimp, Artemia franciscana.

Authors:  Kevin V Brix; Rick D Cardwell; William J Adams
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Inventory of marine biotest methods for the evaluation of dredged material and sediments.

Authors:  Monika Nendza
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Comparison of solid-phase bioassays and ecoscores to evaluate the toxicity of contaminated soils.

Authors:  Christine Lors; Jean-François Ponge; Maite Martínez Aldaya; Denis Damidot
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  A test battery approach for the ecotoxicological evaluation of estuarine sediments.

Authors:  M Davoren; S Ní Shúilleabháin; J O'Halloran; M G J Hartl; D Sheehan; N M O'Brien; F N A M van Pelt; C Mothersill
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  A test battery approach for ecotoxicological characterization of Mar Piccolo sediments in Taranto (Ionian Sea, Southern Italy).

Authors:  M Narracci; R A Cavallo; M I Acquaviva; E Prato; F Biandolino
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Levels of antifoulant Irgarol 1051 in the Conwy Marina, North Wales.

Authors:  C J Sargent; J C Bowman; J L Zhou
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Toxic effects of irgarol and diuron on sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus early development, fertilization, and offspring quality.

Authors:  S Manzo; S Buono; C Cremisini
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Comparison of bioassays by testing whole soil and their water extract from contaminated sites.

Authors:  Laura Leitgib; Judit Kálmán; Katalin Gruiz
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Derivation of a chronic site-specific water quality standard for selenium in the Great Salt Lake, Utah, USA.

Authors:  Kevin V Brix; David K DeForest; Rick D Cardwell; William J Adams
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  3 in total

1.  Environmental hazard assessment by the Ecoscore system to discriminate PAH-polluted soils.

Authors:  Christine Lors; Jean-François Ponge; Denis Damidot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Testing ZnO nanoparticle ecotoxicity: linking time variable exposure to effects on different marine model organisms.

Authors:  Simona Schiavo; Maria Oliviero; Jiji Li; Sonia Manzo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Microscale Ecotoxicity Testing of Moselle River Watershed (Lorraine Province, France) Sediments.

Authors:  Jean François Férard; Karen F Burga Pérez; Christian Blaise; Alexandre Péry; Pakawadee Sutthivaiyakit; François Gagné
Journal:  J Xenobiot       Date:  2015-06-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.