Literature DB >> 25011716

Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR: a meta-analysis.

George C M Siontis1, Peter Jüni2, Thomas Pilgrim1, Stefan Stortecky1, Lutz Büllesfeld1, Bernhard Meier1, Peter Wenaweser1, Stephan Windecker3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation may complicate transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Available evidence on predictors of PPM is sparse and derived from small studies.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to provide summary effect estimates for clinically useful predictors of PPM implantation after TAVR.
METHODS: We performed a systematic search for studies that reported the incidence of PPM implantation after TAVR and that provided raw data for the predictors of interest. Data on study, patient, and procedural characteristics were abstracted. Crude risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals for each predictor were calculated by use of random effects models. Stratified analyses by type of implanted valve were performed.
RESULTS: We obtained data from 41 studies that included 11,210 TAVR patients, of whom 17% required PPM implantation after intervention. The rate of PPM ranged from 2% to 51% in individual studies (with a median of 28% for the Medtronic CoreValve Revalving System [MCRS] and 6% for the Edwards SAPIEN valve [ESV]). The summary estimates indicated increased risk of PPM after TAVR for men (RR: 1.23; p < 0.01); for patients with first-degree AV block (RR: 1.52; p < 0.01), left anterior hemiblock (RR: 1.62; p < 0.01), or right bundle branch block (RR: 2.89; p < 0.01) at baseline; and for patients with intraprocedural AV block (RR: 3.49; p < 0.01). These variables remained significant predictors when only patients treated with the MCRS bioprosthesis were considered. The data for ESV were limited. Unadjusted estimates indicated a 2.5-fold higher risk for PPM implantation for patients who received the MCRS than for those who received the ESV.
CONCLUSIONS: Male sex, baseline conduction disturbances, and intraprocedural AV block emerged as predictors of PPM implantation after TAVR. This study provides useful tools to identify high-risk patients and to guide clinical decision making before and after intervention.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; conduction disturbances; permanent pacemaker; predictor; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25011716     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  103 in total

Review 1.  The Prognostic Impact of New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomo Ando; Hisato Takagi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Comprehensive Review and Present Status.

Authors:  Sameer Arora; Jacob A Misenheimer; Radhakrishnan Ramaraj
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-02-01

3.  A case of a successful post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement His bundle pacing.

Authors:  Fei Lv; Xiao-Hong Pan; Jia-Qi Fan; Li-Han Wang; Dan-Dan Yang; Xin-Ping Lin; Hua-Jun Li; Qi-Feng Zhu; Xian-Bao Liu; Jian-An Wang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2021

4.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement-where are we?

Authors:  Sameer Arora; John P Vavalle
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Current rare indications and future directions for implantable loop recorders.

Authors:  Simon Wechselberger; Christopher Piorkowski; Matthias Pohl
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-12

Review 6.  TAVR Vs. SAVR in Intermediate-Risk Patients: What Influences Our Choice of Therapy.

Authors:  Sasha Still; Molly Szerlip; Michael Mack
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Evolving Indications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions.

Authors:  Anna Franzone; Thomas Pilgrim; Stefan Stortecky; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Future of transcatheter aortic valve implantation - evolving clinical indications.

Authors:  Rishi Puri; Chekrallah Chamandi; Tania Rodriguez-Gabella; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate and low risk patients-clinical evidence.

Authors:  Sameer Arora; John P Vavalle
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

10.  Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after TAVR - Predictors and Impact on Outcomes.

Authors:  Marcel Weber; Jan-Malte Sinning; Christoph Hammerstingl; Nikos Werner; Eberhard Grube; Georg Nickenig
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.