Hyojung Tak1, Gregory W Ruhnke, Ya-Chen Tina Shih. 1. Department of Health Management and Policy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Boulevard, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA, hyojung.tak@unthsc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the attributes of care that most strongly impact satisfaction in real-world settings where patients' limited medical knowledge may restrict their ability to ascertain the true quality of care. We therefore examined the association between patient-centered attributes of physician care (thoroughness, explanation, and listening), in-office waiting time, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: We used the Community Tracking Study Household Survey, a US nationally representative dataset (n = 71,594). Using logistic regression models, we analyzed the association between patient ratings of care attributes and patient satisfaction for the total sample and by subgroups, according to health status, physician type, and visit type. RESULTS: Patients' perception of excellent or very good care attributes was strongly associated with being very satisfied with care received (thoroughness of care, odds ratio [OR] 2.64, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.31-3.02; listening, OR 2.04, 95 % CI 1.77-2.36; explanation, OR 1.63, 95 % CI 1.42-1.86), as was a waiting time of ≤10 min (OR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.39-1.63). The effect magnitude of thoroughness on satisfaction is particularly strong relative to high-quality listening and explanation among respondents in poor health, and for whom the most recent office visit was to see a generalist or for curative care. CONCLUSIONS: Thoroughness of care was the strongest determinant of patient satisfaction, followed by physician listening and explanation. Especially with patients' improved access to current medical information, it is important for physicians to recognize that excellent communication cannot serve as a substitute for high-quality, thorough care.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the attributes of care that most strongly impact satisfaction in real-world settings where patients' limited medical knowledge may restrict their ability to ascertain the true quality of care. We therefore examined the association between patient-centered attributes of physician care (thoroughness, explanation, and listening), in-office waiting time, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: We used the Community Tracking Study Household Survey, a US nationally representative dataset (n = 71,594). Using logistic regression models, we analyzed the association between patient ratings of care attributes and patient satisfaction for the total sample and by subgroups, according to health status, physician type, and visit type. RESULTS:Patients' perception of excellent or very good care attributes was strongly associated with being very satisfied with care received (thoroughness of care, odds ratio [OR] 2.64, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.31-3.02; listening, OR 2.04, 95 % CI 1.77-2.36; explanation, OR 1.63, 95 % CI 1.42-1.86), as was a waiting time of ≤10 min (OR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.39-1.63). The effect magnitude of thoroughness on satisfaction is particularly strong relative to high-quality listening and explanation among respondents in poor health, and for whom the most recent office visit was to see a generalist or for curative care. CONCLUSIONS: Thoroughness of care was the strongest determinant of patient satisfaction, followed by physician listening and explanation. Especially with patients' improved access to current medical information, it is important for physicians to recognize that excellent communication cannot serve as a substitute for high-quality, thorough care.
Authors: Emily F Boss; Anne R Links; Ron Saxton; Tina L Cheng; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: John Fp Bridges; Norah L Crossnohere; Anne L Schuster; Judith A Miller; Carolyn Pastorini; Rebecca A Aslakson Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Toral J Parikh; Christian D Helfrich; Ana R Quiñones; Gillian L Marshall-Fabien; Lena K Makaroun; Marissa A Black; Stephen M Thielke Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 1.817