Literature DB >> 25011414

Statistical power calculations for mixed pharmacokinetic study designs using a population approach.

Frank Kloprogge1, Julie A Simpson, Nicholas P J Day, Nicholas J White, Joel Tarning.   

Abstract

Simultaneous modelling of dense and sparse pharmacokinetic data is possible with a population approach. To determine the number of individuals required to detect the effect of a covariate, simulation-based power calculation methodologies can be employed. The Monte Carlo Mapped Power method (a simulation-based power calculation methodology using the likelihood ratio test) was extended in the current study to perform sample size calculations for mixed pharmacokinetic studies (i.e. both sparse and dense data collection). A workflow guiding an easy and straightforward pharmacokinetic study design, considering also the cost-effectiveness of alternative study designs, was used in this analysis. Initially, data were simulated for a hypothetical drug and then for the anti-malarial drug, dihydroartemisinin. Two datasets (sampling design A: dense; sampling design B: sparse) were simulated using a pharmacokinetic model that included a binary covariate effect and subsequently re-estimated using (1) the same model and (2) a model not including the covariate effect in NONMEM 7.2. Power calculations were performed for varying numbers of patients with sampling designs A and B. Study designs with statistical power >80% were selected and further evaluated for cost-effectiveness. The simulation studies of the hypothetical drug and the anti-malarial drug dihydroartemisinin demonstrated that the simulation-based power calculation methodology, based on the Monte Carlo Mapped Power method, can be utilised to evaluate and determine the sample size of mixed (part sparsely and part densely sampled) study designs. The developed method can contribute to the design of robust and efficient pharmacokinetic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25011414      PMCID: PMC4147042          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-014-9641-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  12 in total

1.  Development and implementation of the population Fisher information matrix for the evaluation of population pharmacokinetic designs.

Authors:  S Retout; S Duffull; F Mentré
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Further developments of the Fisher information matrix in nonlinear mixed effects models with evaluation in population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Sylvie Retout; France Mentré
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Optimization of individual and population designs using Splus.

Authors:  Sylvie Retout; France Mentré
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Rapid sample size calculations for a defined likelihood ratio test-based power in mixed-effects models.

Authors:  Camille Vong; Martin Bergstrand; Joakim Nyberg; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Methods and software tools for design evaluation in population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics studies.

Authors:  Joakim Nyberg; Caroline Bazzoli; Kay Ogungbenro; Alexander Aliev; Sergei Leonov; Stephen Duffull; Andrew C Hooker; France Mentré
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Design in nonlinear mixed effects models: optimization using the Fedorov-Wynn algorithm and power of the Wald test for binary covariates.

Authors:  Sylvie Retout; Emmanuelle Comets; Adeline Samson; France Mentré
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Pharmacogenetics and population pharmacokinetics: impact of the design on three tests using the SAEM algorithm.

Authors:  Julie Bertrand; Emmanuelle Comets; Céline M Laffont; Marylore Chenel; France Mentré
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Model-based analyses of bioequivalence crossover trials using the stochastic approximation expectation maximisation algorithm.

Authors:  Anne Dubois; Marc Lavielle; Sandro Gsteiger; Etienne Pigeolet; France Mentré
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Population pharmacokinetics of dihydroartemisinin and piperaquine in pregnant and nonpregnant women with uncomplicated malaria.

Authors:  Joel Tarning; Marcus J Rijken; Rose McGready; Aung Pyae Phyo; Warunee Hanpithakpong; Nicholas P J Day; Nicholas J White; François Nosten; Niklas Lindegardh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Optimal designs for population pharmacokinetic studies of oral artesunate in patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria.

Authors:  Kris M Jamsen; Stephen B Duffull; Joel Tarning; Niklas Lindegardh; Nicholas J White; Julie A Simpson
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.979

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  On precision dosing of oral small molecule drugs in oncology.

Authors:  Alex K Lyashchenko; Serge Cremers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Combined Analysis of Phase I and Phase II Data to Enhance the Power of Pharmacogenetic Tests.

Authors:  A Tessier; J Bertrand; M Chenel; E Comets
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-14

3.  Accelerating Monte Carlo power studies through parametric power estimation.

Authors:  Sebastian Ueckert; Mats O Karlsson; Andrew C Hooker
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.745

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.