Literature DB >> 32621551

On precision dosing of oral small molecule drugs in oncology.

Alex K Lyashchenko1, Serge Cremers2.   

Abstract

Personalization of oral small molecule anticancer drug doses based on individual patient blood drug levels, also known as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), has the potential to significantly improve the effectiveness of treatment by maximizing drug efficacy and minimize toxicity. However, this option has not yet been widely embraced by the oncology community. Some reasons for this include increased logistical complexity of dose individualization, the lack of clinical laboratories that measure small molecule drug concentrations in support of patient care, and the lack of reimbursement of costs. However, the main obstacle may be the lack of studies clearly demonstrating that monitoring of oral small molecule anticancer drug levels actually improves clinical outcomes. Without unequivocal evidence in support of TDM-guided dose individualization, especially demonstration of improved survival with TDM in randomized controlled trials, wide acceptance of this approach by oncologists and reimbursement by insurance companies is unlikely, and patients may continue to suffer as a result of receiving incorrect drug doses. This article reviews the current status of TDM of oral small molecule drugs in oncology and intends to provide strategic insights into the design of studies for evaluating the utility of TDM in this clinical context.
© 2020 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; oncology; oral small molecule drugs; pharmacokinetics; therapeutic drug monitoring; tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32621551      PMCID: PMC8938983          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  40 in total

1.  Guidelines for the development and incorporation of biomarker studies in early clinical trials of novel agents.

Authors:  Janet E Dancey; Kevin K Dobbin; Susan Groshen; J Milburn Jessup; Andrew H Hruszkewycz; Maria Koehler; Ralph Parchment; Mark J Ratain; Lalitha K Shankar; Walter M Stadler; Lawrence D True; Amy Gravell; Michael R Grever
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Effect of assay methodology on pharmacokinetic differences between cyclosporine Neoral and Sandimmune formulations.

Authors:  L J Aspeslet; D F LeGatt; G Murphy; R W Yatscoff
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Abstracts of the 19th Annual Meeting of French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 36th Pharmacovigilance Meeting, 16th APNET Seminar, 13th CHU CIC Meeting, 21-23 April, 2015, Caen, France.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.748

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic Targets for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Small Molecule Kinase Inhibitors in Pediatric Oncology.

Authors:  Julie M Janssen; Thomas P C Dorlo; Neeltje Steeghs; Jos H Beijnen; Lidwien M Hanff; Natasha K A van Eijkelenburg; Jasper van der Lugt; C Michel Zwaan; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  The time to progression ratio: a new individualized volumetric parameter for the early detection of clinical benefit of targeted therapies.

Authors:  G A Cirkel; F Weeber; S Bins; C G M Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk; E van Werkhoven; S M Willems; M van Stralen; W B Veldhuis; I Ubink; N Steeghs; M J de Jonge; M H G Langenberg; J H M Schellens; S Sleijfer; M P Lolkema; E E Voest
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize the dosing of pazopanib: a pharmacokinetic feasibility study.

Authors:  Djoeke de Wit; Nielka P van Erp; Jan den Hartigh; Ron Wolterbeek; Margret den Hollander-van Deursen; Mariëtte Labots; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Henk M Verheul; Hans Gelderblom
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  Clinical usefulness of therapeutic concentration monitoring for imatinib dosage individualization: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  V Gotta; N Widmer; L A Decosterd; Y Chalandon; D Heim; M Gregor; R Benz; L Leoncini-Franscini; G M Baerlocher; M A Duchosal; C Csajka; T Buclin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  The association between clinician-based common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO): a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Sean J Ryan; Antonia V Bennett; Angela M Stover; Rebecca M Saracino; Lauren J Rogak; Sarah T Jewell; Konstantina Matsoukas; Yuelin Li; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Pazopanib: Towards Optimized Dosing.

Authors:  Remy B Verheijen; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Alwin D R Huitema; Neeltje Steeghs
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.