Literature DB >> 25010999

Socioecologic factors as predictors of readiness for self-management and transition, medication adherence, and health care utilization among adolescents and young adults with chronic kidney disease.

Karina Javalkar1, Nicole Fenton2, Sarah Cohen1, Maria Ferris3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of our study was to determine the socioecologic factors that predict readiness for self-management and transition from pediatric to adult health care services, adherence to taking medications, and health care utilization among adolescents and young adults with chronic kidney disease.
METHODS: We enrolled 52 adolescents and young adults aged 13 to 21 (96.5% participation). Participants were administered measures that examined: socioecologic factors, individualized education plans or 504 plans, readiness for self-management and transition (the University of North Carolina TRxANSITION scale), triangulated measures of adherence to taking medications (parent reported, physician reported, and medication-possession ratios), and health care utilization (number of visits to the emergency department, number of inpatient admissions, and number of inpatient days in the previous year).
RESULTS: Overall, our sample had moderate levels of readiness for self-management and transition, high rates of parent- and physician-reported medication adherence, and high rates of health care utilization. Age was a significant positive predictor of readiness for self-management and transition. Compared with participants who had private health insurance, participants who had public insurance had more emergency department visits, inpatient admissions, and inpatient days, and lower rates of physician-reported medication adherence. Participants who did not have an individualized education plan or 504 plan had significantly more emergency department visits, inpatient admissions, and inpatient days.
CONCLUSION: Socioecologic factors play an important role in readiness for self-management and transition, medication adherence, and health care utilization in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease. Age, insurance status, and having an individualized education plan or 504 plan may be key factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25010999      PMCID: PMC4093979          DOI: 10.5888/pcd11.140072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis        ISSN: 1545-1151            Impact factor:   2.830


Introduction

Understanding the socioecologic factors that predict health outcomes in chronic disease may provide insight for designing effective interventions. Adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions are vulnerable to health risks when they start to self-manage their condition. Inadequate preparation for the transition from pediatric- to adult-focused health care services may result in negative health outcomes (1). Disease self-management, adherence to taking medications, and health care utilization are 3 important outcomes during this transition process (1,2). Few studies of youth with chronic conditions investigate how socioecologic factors predict outcomes. One study of children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) found that those with low perceived health status had higher rates of health care utilization (3). In another study, children and adults with Medicaid insurance were more likely to visit the emergency department than those with commercial insurance (4). The objective of our study was to determine the socioecologic factors that predict readiness for self-management and transition from pediatric to adult health care services, adherence to taking medications, and health care utilization among adolescents and young adults with CKD.

Methods

Data collection

We recruited a convenience sample in the clinic at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Kidney Center in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, during 2012 and 2013. To be eligible to participate, patients had to be aged from 13 to 21 years and have a diagnosis of CKD (stage 2 or above) for more than 3 months. Potential participants who did not speak English fluently (or their parents if the patients were younger than 18) were excluded from the study, as were those who had significant cognitive or developmental delays. Eligibility was determined on the basis of the health provider’s assessment and a review of the electronic medical record (5). The study was approved by the institutional review board at UNC–Chapel Hill. Once eligible participants were in their clinic rooms, they were approached by a trained research assistant and provided with a study overview. If the potential participant expressed a desire to participate, informed assent and consent forms and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act forms were completed by the participants or their guardians. Participants first completed the 33-item UNC TRxANSITION scale (6) administered by the research assistant. They then answered questions on socioecologic factors, health care utilization, and medication adherence by using the Web-based survey engine Qualtrics (Qualtrics, LLC, Provo, Utah). If the participants did not have time to complete the Web-based questionnaires at the clinic, they were given a Web link to access the survey on their home computers. Also during the clinic visit, parents were asked to rate their child’s adherence to taking medications. On completing the study visit, physicians were asked to rate the adherence of the participant, and pharmacies were contacted to obtain medication refill records.

Measures

Readiness for self-management and transition. The UNC TRxANSITION scale was used to assess disease self-management and the participant’s readiness to transition from pediatric to adult health care (6). This survey is administered in person by a health care provider or trained research assistant. It assesses disease self-efficacy (what the person thinks they can do to manage their illness) and disease knowledge as continuous variables. The scale has 10 subscales: 1) knowledge of type of illness, 2) knowledge of prescriptions, 3) adherence to treatment, 4) knowledge of nutrition restrictions, 5) self-management skills, 6) knowledge of reproduction issues, 7) knowledge of importance of a trade or school (knowledge of participants’ plans for school or a job), 8) knowledge of insurance, 9) identification of ongoing support (knowledge of how to take care of themselves when they become adults), and 10) knowledge of how to find new [health care] providers. Each question in the scale is scored by the administrator as follows: 0 points (no knowledge or self-management), 0.5 points (some knowledge or self-management), or 1 point (complete knowledge or self-management). A total score is calculated (range, 0–10) and reflects overall readiness for health care transition. Adequate reliability has been found (κ = 0.70), and other information on validity has been published (6). Socioecologic factors. A self-report, Web-based questionnaire was created for this study. We asked participants about their age, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, African American, Hispanic, Native American, Asian, and “other”), sex (male, female), use of an individualized education plan (IEP) or 504 plan (yes or no), insurance status (private, public [Medicare or Medicaid], or self-pay), age at diagnosis of CKD, and parents’ highest grade of school completed. An IEP is a plan or program in which a child who has a disability identified under the law and is attending an elementary or secondary educational institution receives specialized instruction and related services. A 504 plan ensures that such a child receives appropriate accommodations. We collected data on IEP and 504 plans only from participants who had not yet graduated from high school (n = 40). Data on the number of prescribed medications were obtained from the medical record. Health care utilization. We asked participants to report the number of times in the previous year they had visited the emergency department, the number of times they had been admitted to the hospital, and the total number of days they had spent as a hospital inpatient. These questions were administered online, and answers were treated as continuous variables. Medication adherence. Medication adherence was estimated as a continuous variable by using 3 sources: parent report, physician report, and pharmacy refill records; the latter were used to calculate the medication-possession ratio (MPR). Each participant’s parent and subspecialist were asked (in person) to estimate (confidentially) the percentage of time they think the participant does not take his or her medications. The questions were “Please rate on a scale of 0 to 100 how adherent you think the following patient is to their medications” and “Please rate on a scale of 0 to 100 how adherent you think your child is to their medications (how often do they take their medications as prescribed?).” The response range was 0 to 100, with 0 being that the participant never took the medications and 100 being that the participant adhered perfectly. This question was modeled after studies that used 1 question to estimate medication adherence (7–9). The MPR was used as an objective measure of adherence. We obtained each participant’s pharmacy refill records for 1 year before the date of study participation and used it to calculate the 3-month MPR. Studies have found that the MPR for a 3-month period is representative of a patient’s typical adherence (10). The pharmacy refill record included a list of medications and the date each was filled or refilled at that pharmacy. We defined MPR as the proportion of prescribed medications obtained by the participant during a specific period [MPR = (number of days the participant had a supply of the medication during the observation period ÷ number of days in observation period) × 100]. This method is consistent with previous studies (9,10).

Statistical analysis

A power analysis was calculated by using SAS 9.3 TS1M2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina). Assuming a moderate effect size (0.4) and a 1-tailed α of .05, we determined that a sample size of 42 would be sufficient to obtain power of .80 for our model. We calculated the participation rate as the number of patients that agreed to participate divided by the number of eligible patients approached. We calculated the percentage of life that the participant had CKD by subtracting age at diagnosis from current age and then dividing by current age. Regression analyses were conducted to examine the socioecologic factors that predict readiness for self-management and transition, medication adherence, and health care utilization. The factors in each of the regression analyses were the following independent variables: age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, percentage of life with disease; use of an IEP or 504 plan, and number of prescribed medicines. For the regression analyses on self-management and transition readiness, we used the total TRxANSITION score as well as the scores for each of the subscales as the outcomes of interest. Significance was determined at P ≤ .05. Descriptive statistics were calculated and linear regression analyses were conducted by using IBM SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York).

Results

We enrolled 52 participants (96.5% participation): 30 (58%) were male; 16 (30%) were non-Hispanic white, and 26 (50%) were African American; the average age was 17.6 years (range, 13–21 y) (Table 1). Thirty-one percent had private insurance, 62% had public insurance, and 8% were self-pay. On average, participants had lived with their disease for 46.4% (standard deviation [SD], 35.8%) of their life. On average, participants were prescribed 4.7 (SD, 2.7) medications, and 21 of 40 (52.5%) participants who answered the question about having an IEP or 504 plan had one.
Table 1

Characteristics of Participants (n = 52) in Study of Adolescents and Young Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

CharacteristicValuea
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white16 (31)
African American26 (50)
Hispanic1 (2)
Native American6 (12)
Asian1 (2)
Other2 (4)
Sex
Male30 (58)
Female22 (42)
Age, mean (SD), y 17.6 (2.2)
Percentage of life with disease, mean (SD) 46.4 (35.8)
Insurance status
Private insurance16 (31)
Public insurance32 (62)
Self-pay4 (8)
No. of medications, mean (SD) 4.7 (2.7)
Has an IEP/504 planb 21 (52.5)
Highest school grade attained by parent, mean (SD) 13.6 (2.5)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation: IEP, individualized education plan.

Values are mean (%) unless otherwise indicated. Percentages may not sum to 100% because of rounding.

An IEP is a plan or program in which a child who has a disability identified under the law and is attending an elementary or secondary educational institution receives specialized instruction and related services. A 504 plan ensures that such a child receives appropriate accommodations. We collected data on IEP and 504 plans only from participants who had not yet graduated from high school (n = 40).

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation: IEP, individualized education plan. Values are mean (%) unless otherwise indicated. Percentages may not sum to 100% because of rounding. An IEP is a plan or program in which a child who has a disability identified under the law and is attending an elementary or secondary educational institution receives specialized instruction and related services. A 504 plan ensures that such a child receives appropriate accommodations. We collected data on IEP and 504 plans only from participants who had not yet graduated from high school (n = 40). The mean total score for the TRxANSITION scale was 6.9 (SD, 1.4) (Table 2). The rate of health care utilization was high; on average, participants visited the emergency department 3.4 (SD, 8.6) times and had 3.1 (SD, 7.9) hospital admissions in the previous year. According to parent and physician reports, the study group had a high rate of medication adherence. The average rate reported by parents was 85.5% (SD, 22.8%), and the average rate reported by physicians was 80.7% (SD, 21.2%). However, the MPR showed that participants had a supply of their medications only 55.0% (SD, 50.4%) of the time.
Table 2

Readiness for Self-Management and Transition, Medication Adherence, and Health Care Utilization by Adolescents and Young Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease (N = 52), Chapel Hill, North Carolina

OutcomeMean (Standard Deviation)
Total TRxANSITIONa score 6.9 (1.4)
Know type of illness0.74 (0.26)
Know Rx (prescriptions)0.71 (0.22)
Be adherent to treatment0.82 (0.23)
Know nutrition restrictions0.64 (0.31)
Have self-management skills0.54 (0.30)
Know issues of reproduction0.61 (0.32)
Know the importance of a trade or school0.81 (0.33)
Know about insurance0.56 (0.28)
Identify ongoing support0.91 (0.19)
Know how to find new providers0.57 (0.31)
Health care utilization
No. of emergency department visits in previous year3.4 (8.6)
No. of inpatient admissions in previous year3.1 (7.9)
No. of total inpatient days in previous year5.6 (9.0)
Adherence (range, 0–100)
Medication-possession ratiob 55.0 (50.4)
Physician rating of medication adherence80.7 (21.2)
Parent rating of medication adherence85.5 (22.8)

The 33-item University of North Carolina TRxANSITION scale ranges from 0 to 10.

Defined as the proportion of prescribed medications obtained by the participant during a specific period [MPR = (number of days the participant had a supply of the medication during the observation period ÷ number of days in observation period) × 100].

The 33-item University of North Carolina TRxANSITION scale ranges from 0 to 10. Defined as the proportion of prescribed medications obtained by the participant during a specific period [MPR = (number of days the participant had a supply of the medication during the observation period ÷ number of days in observation period) × 100]. Age was a significant positive predictor of the total TRxANSITION score (β = 0.384; P = .046) and the disease self-management subscale (β = 0.361; P = .04) (Table 3). Sex was a significant predictor of one TRxANSITION outcome: female participants had higher scores for the trade or school subscale (β = 0.431; P = .03). Participants with private insurance had greater knowledge of who would manage their illness when they became adults (ongoing support subscale, β = −0.422; P = .05).
Table 3

Predictors of Readiness for Self-Management and Transition and Health Care Utilization Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Variableβ P Value for Linear Regression
Total TRxANSITION score
Insurancea −0.128.52
Age0.384.05
Percentage of life with disease−0.151.45
Sexb 0.305.10
Racec 0.027.90
IEP/504 pland −0.162.41
Total no. of prescribed medicines0.037.84
TRxANSITION disease self-management
Insurancea 0.081.66
Age0.361.04
Percentage of life with disease0.154.41
Sexb 0.072.67
Racec 0.261.21
IEP/504 pland −0.263.16
Total no. of prescribed medicines0.070.69
TRxANSITION trade or school
Insurancea −0.193.34
Age0.023.90
Percentage of life with disease−0.115.57
Sexb 0.431.03
Racec −0.196.39
IEP/504 pland −0.071.72
Total no. of prescribed medicines0.018.93
TRxANSITION ongoing support
Insurancea −0.422.05
Age−0.158.41
Percentage of life with disease−0.126.54
Sexb −0.185.34
Racec 0.208.37
IEP/504 pland 0.008.97
Total no. of prescribed medicines0.159.43
No. of emergency department visits in previous year
Insurancea 0.423.02
Age0.672.001
Percentage of life with disease0.000>.99
Sexb 0.353.04
Racec −0.669.004
IEP/504 pland 0.369.04
Total no. of prescribed medicines0.041.82
No. of hospital admissions in previous year
Insurancea 0.405.04
Age0.675.001
Percentage of life with disease0.002.99
Sexb 0.312.07
Racec −0.601.01
IEP/504 pland 0.429.03
Total no. of prescribed medicines0.008.96
Total no. of inpatient days in previous year
Insurancea 0.360.01
Age0.751<.001
Percentage of life with disease0.055.70
Sexb 0.325.02
Racec −0.623.001
IEP/504 pland 0.447.003
Total no. of prescribed medicines−0.093.51
Physician rating of medication adherence
Insurancea −0.727.009
Age0.033.86
Percentage of life with disease−0.196.32
Sexb −0.024.89
Racec 0.262.33
IEP/504 pland 0.215.26
Total no. of prescribed medicines0.010.96

Abbreviations: IEP, individualized education plan.

A positive value for β indicates public insurance or self-pay as a predictor, whereas a negative value indicates private insurance.

A positive value for β indicates that female sex is a predictor, whereas a negative value indicates male sex.

A negative value for β indicates the white race as a predictor, whereas a positive value indicates another race (African American, Hispanic, Native American, Asian, or “other”).

A positive value for β indicates not having an IEP or 504 plan, whereas a negative value indicates having one.

Abbreviations: IEP, individualized education plan. A positive value for β indicates public insurance or self-pay as a predictor, whereas a negative value indicates private insurance. A positive value for β indicates that female sex is a predictor, whereas a negative value indicates male sex. A negative value for β indicates the white race as a predictor, whereas a positive value indicates another race (African American, Hispanic, Native American, Asian, or “other”). A positive value for β indicates not having an IEP or 504 plan, whereas a negative value indicates having one. Having public insurance, increasing age, being female, being white, or not having an IEP or 504 plan were each significant predictors of greater rates of health care utilization (Table 3). Participants who had public insurance (β = 0.423; P = .02), who were older (β = 0.672; P = .001), were female (β = 0.353; P = .04), were white (β = −0.669; P = .004), or did not have an IEP or 504 plan (β = 0.369, P = .04) had more emergency department visits in the previous year. These same factors also predicted more days spent as an inpatient in the previous year (Table 2). Similarly, participants who had public insurance (β = 0.405; P = .04), were older (β = 0.675; P = .001), were white (β = −0.601; P = .01), or did not have an IEP or 504 plan (β = 0.429; P = .03) had more hospital admissions in the previous year. The overall models predicting emergency departments visits (P = .005), hospital admissions (P = .01), and total number of inpatient days (P < .001) suggested that socioecologic factors were significant predictors of health care utilization outcomes. None of the socioecologic factors predicted the rates of medication adherence indicated by parents or the MPRs. However, insurance status was a significant predictor of physician-reported medication adherence. Participants with private insurance received a higher physician-reported adherence rating (β = −0.727, P = .009) than participants with public or self-pay insurance.

Discussion

This study examined the role of socioecologic factors in predicting readiness for self-management and health care transition, medication adherence, and health care utilization among adolescents and young adults with CKD. The study included a large proportion of racial/ethnic minorities, which was representative of the CKD population served at the UNC Kidney Center and the population of CKD patients served across the country (11). In our study, participants who had private insurance had significantly higher rates of physician-reported medication adherence and significantly greater knowledge of how to take care of themselves when they became adults than participants with public insurance. Health care utilization outcomes were also predicted by insurance status. Participants who had private insurance spent fewer total days admitted in the hospital than those with public insurance. Our results are consistent with those of previous studies, which showed that pediatric patients with public health insurance may have higher rates of emergency department visits than those with private insurance (12). Public insurance therefore appears to be an important factor for poor transition readiness and negative health care utilization outcomes. We found that having IEPs or 504 plans were significant predictors of the outcomes examined. Participants that had an IEP or 504 plan had significantly fewer emergency department visits, fewer number of times they were admitted to the hospital, and fewer number of inpatient days in the previous year, suggesting that their IEP or 504 plan may be aiding in keeping them healthy and away from the emergency department or a hospitalization. An IEP or 504 plan was generally a predictor of positive outcomes in this population. Perhaps the school accommodations help to minimize stress, which increases immune functioning and results in lower rates of emergency health care utilization (13). Factors that account for this relationship should be explored in future investigations. It may be important to ensure that those with CKD who need an IEP or 504 plan receive one; having one may put them at less risk for negative health care utilization outcomes. Our study has several limitations. First, the measures of health care utilization were self-reported. Second, we were unable to control for disease severity directly (although we did control for percentage of life with disease and number of prescribed medications). There may be other potentially confounding variables that were not explored in this study. Third, 2 of the 3 measures of medication adherence (parent reported and physician reported) may have underlying biases. To overcome this limitation, we made every effort to use all 3 measures of adherence, including the objective measure, the MPR. Fourth, this was a single-center study. We are expanding our observations to other institutions to increase the generalizability of our findings. Socioecologic variables are often used as control variables when trying to understand a patient’s level of adjustment to a chronic illness. This approach often results in the explanatory role of demographic variables themselves being overlooked. We found that these socioecologic factors allowed for a partial understanding of readiness for self-management and transition, medication adherence, and health care utilization in pediatric patients with CKD. Socioecologic factors were an especially helpful way to conceptualize data on the number of emergency visits and hospitalizations. Important predictors of readiness for self-management and transition to self-management among adolescents and young adults with CKD included age, insurance status, and having an IEP or 504 plan.
  10 in total

1.  K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 2.  Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases.

Authors:  Susan E Andrade; Kristijan H Kahler; Feride Frech; K Arnold Chan
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  A clinical tool to measure the components of health-care transition from pediatric care to adult care: the UNC TR(x)ANSITION scale.

Authors:  Maria E Ferris; Donna H Harward; Kristi Bickford; J Bradley Layton; M Ted Ferris; Susan L Hogan; Debbie S Gipson; Lynn P McCoy; Stephen R Hooper
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 2.606

4.  Assessing health status and health care utilization in adolescents with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Arlene C Gerson; Anne Riley; Barbara A Fivush; Ngoc Pham; Jeffrey Fiorenza; Judy Robertson; Manju Chandra; Howard Trachtman; Robert Weiss; Susan L Furth
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  The influence of insurance status on nonurgent pediatric visits to the emergency department.

Authors:  C Fong
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Utilization of healthcare resources by U.S. children and adults with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Michael D Kappelman; Carol Q Porter; Joseph A Galanko; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Daniel A Ollendorf; Robert S Sandler; Jonathan A Finkelstein
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 7.  Problems and pitfalls of transition from paediatric to adult renal care.

Authors:  Alan R Watson
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry.

Authors:  Suzanne C Segerstrom; Gregory E Miller
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 9.  Pediatric chronic kidney disease and the process of health care transition.

Authors:  Maria E Ferris; John D Mahan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 10.  Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in children.

Authors:  Jérôme Harambat; Karlijn J van Stralen; Jon Jin Kim; E Jane Tizard
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.714

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  Current management of transition of young people affected by rare renal conditions in the ERKNet.

Authors:  Martin Kreuzer; Jens Drube; Jenny Prüfe; Franz Schaefer; Lars Pape
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Moving on: transitioning young people with chronic kidney disease to adult care.

Authors:  Anna Francis; David W Johnson; Jonathan C Craig; Germaine Wong
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Treatment Adherence in Young Adults Receiving Kidney Replacement Therapy: A Patient Perspective.

Authors:  Amanda Grandinetti
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  A Systematic Review of Transition Readiness in Youth with Chronic Disease.

Authors:  Maureen Varty; Lori L Popejoy
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Interviewing and Urine Drug Toxicology Screening in a Pediatric Pain Management Center: An Analysis of Analgesic Nonadherence and Aberrant Behaviors in Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  John M Saroyan; Elizabeth A Evans; Andrew Segoshi; Suzanne K Vosburg; Debra Miller-Saultz; Maria A Sullivan
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Predictors of Caregiver Burden among Mothers of Children with Chronic Conditions.

Authors:  Karina Javalkar; Eniko Rak; Alexandra Phillips; Cara Haberman; Maria Ferris; Miranda Van Tilburg
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-16

7.  A Photo Elicitation Study on Chronically Ill Adolescents' Identity Constructions During Transition.

Authors:  Signe Hanghøj; Kirsten A Boisen; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Bibi Hølge-Hazelton
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2016-03-08

Review 8.  Methodology used in comparative studies assessing programmes of transition from paediatrics to adult care programmes: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Le Roux; H Mellerio; S Guilmin-Crépon; S Gottot; P Jacquin; R Boulkedid; C Alberti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Safeguarding children and young people requiring kidney replacement therapy: challenges and potential opportunities.

Authors:  Hannah Jacob; Matko Marlais
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Pediatric Renal Transplantation: Focus on Current Transition Care and Proposal of the "RISE to Transition" Protocol.

Authors:  Rupesh Raina; Joseph Wang; Vinod Krishnappa; Maria Ferris
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 1.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.