| Literature DB >> 25010608 |
Peiling Yap1, Fang-Wei Wu2, Zun-Wei Du2, Jan Hattendorf1, Ran Chen3, Jin-Yong Jiang2, Susi Kriemler4, Stefanie J Krauth5, Xiao-Nong Zhou6, Jürg Utzinger1, Peter Steinmann1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is considerable debate on the health impacts of soil-transmitted helminth infections. We assessed effects of deworming on physical fitness and strength of children in an area in Yunnan, People's Republic of China, where soil-transmitted helminthiasis is highly endemic.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25010608 PMCID: PMC4091871 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Profile of randomized controlled trial conducted in south-west Yunnan province, P.R. China, from October 2011 to May 2012.
Baseline characteristics of 194 children from south-west Yunnan province, P.R. China, who participated in a randomized controlled trial conducted from October 2011 to May 2012.
| Characteristics | Triple-dose albendazole (n = 99) | Placebo (n = 95) | ||
| Male (n = 46) | Female (n = 53) | Male (n = 48) | Female (n = 47) | |
| Age [years] | 10.4 (1.1) | 10.5 (1.2) | 10.4 (1.0) | 10.2 (1.0) |
| Illiterate parents | 32 (69.6%) | 27 (50.9%) | 28 (58.3%) | 22 (46.8%) |
| Family relying on farming for income | 46 (100%) | 53 (100%) | 48 (100%) | 47 (100%) |
|
| ||||
|
| 46 (100%) | 48 (90.6%) | 43 (89.6%) | 44 (93.6%) |
|
| 44 (95.7%) | 48 (90.6%) | 47 (97.9%) | 44 (93.6%) |
| Hookworm | 31 (67.4%) | 29 (54.7%) | 34 (70.8%) | 25 (53.2%) |
|
| n.r. | n.r. | 1 (2.1%) | n.r. |
|
| n.r. | 2 (3.8%) | 1 (2.1%) | 3 (6.4%) |
|
| ||||
|
| 17,163 (7,548–59,106) | 14,652 (5,922–51,324) | 21,579 (4,653–43,425) | 21,432 (6,390–65,532) |
|
| 150 (60–690) | 222 (72–522) | 219 (90–741) | 318 (108–738) |
| Hookworm [EPG] | 72 (0–204) | 30 (0–132) | 48 (0–126) | 12 (0–198) |
|
| ||||
| VO2 max estimate [ml kg−1 min−1] | 45.5 (3.0) | 44.4 (2.6) | 45.7 (3.1) | 45.0 (3.3) |
| 20-m laps completed | 25.4 (8.9) | 22.4 (8.3) | 27.2 (9.3) | 23.2 (10.1) |
|
| ||||
| Grip strength [kg] | 12.9 (3.7) | 12.5 (4.5) | 13.0 (3.5) | 12.1 (3.5) |
| Standing broad jump distance [cm] | 144 (14) | 140 (14) | 146 (14) | 138 (13) |
|
| ||||
| Body height [cm] | 124.8 (6.6) | 129.7 (10.0) | 125.6 (7.4) | 127.0 (6.7) |
| Body weight [kg] | 25.0 (3.8) | 27.3 (6.1) | 25.5 (4.2) | 26.2 (4.7) |
| Body mass index [BMI; kg m−2] | 16.0 (1.1) | 16.0 (1.4) | 16.1 (1.1) | 16.1 (1.6) |
| Wasted | 2 (4.4%) | 2 (3.8%) | n.r. | 3 (6.4%) |
| Stunted | 37 (80.4%) | 36 (67.9%) | 39 (81.3%) | 37 (78.7%) |
| Sum of skinfolds [mm] | 10 (2) | 12 (3) | 10 (2) | 12 (4) |
|
| ||||
| Hemoglobin level [g l−1] | 159 (19) | 162 (28) | 159 (24) | 155 (32) |
| Anemic | n.r. | 3 (5.7%) | 1 (2.1%) | 5 (10.6%) |
Values are number of children (%) or mean (standard deviation; SD). For infection intensity, data is presented as median (interquartile range).
Wasting is defined as ≤−2 BAZ score.
Stunting is defined as ≤−2 HAZ score.
Anemia is defined according to WHO age-specific cut-offs: Hb<115 g l−1 for ages <12 years; Hb<120 g l−1 for ages ≥12 and <15 years.
n.a.: not applicable; n.r.: not represented.
Effects of deworming on changes in physical fitness and strength indicators (primary outcomes) at various follow-ups from baseline among 194 children from south-west Yunnan province, P.R. China, who participated in a randomized controlled trial conducted from October 2011 to May 2012.
| 1-month follow-up | 4-month follow-up | 6-month follow-up | |||||||
| Characteristics | ALB (n = 99) | PLB (n = 95) | Difference in Δ from baseline | ALB (n = 99) | PLB (n = 95) | Differences in Δ from baseline | ALB (n = 99) | PLB (n = 95) | Differences in Δ from baseline |
| VO2 max estimate [ml kg−1 min−1] | 45.9 (1.0) | 45.5 (0.2) |
| 45.7 (0.8) | 46.2 (0.8) | 0.2 (−0.8 to 1.1) | 47.2 (2.3) | 47.5 (2.1) | 0.2 (−0.7 to 1.2) |
| 20-m laps completed | 27.2 (3.4) | 26.6 (1.4) | 2.1 (−0.7 to 5.0) | 29.4 (5.6) | 30.2 (5.0) | 0.9 (−2.1 to 3.9) | 35.7 (11.9) | 36.9 (11.7) | 0.2 (−2.7 to 3.1) |
| Grip strength [kg] | 13.4 (0.8) | 13.0 (0.4) | 0.3 (−0.3 to 0.9) | 14.5 (1.8) | 14.2 (1.6) | 0.1 (−0.5 to 0.8) | 14.6 (2.0) | 14.4 (1.8) | 0.1 (−0.6 to 0.9) |
| Standing broad jump distance [cm] | 142 (0) | 141 (−1) | 2 (−2 to 5) | 146 (4) | 145 (3) | 1 (−2 to 4) | 146 (5) | 149 (7) | −2 (−5 to 2) |
Values are mean (Δ from baseline), unless otherwise stated.
Differences in the changes between follow-up and baseline among the intervention groups are adjusted for village, and at the individual level for sex, age at follow-up, and height and weight at baseline (for the 1-month follow-up) or follow-up (for the 4- and 6-month follow-ups). Values are calculated from a multivariate linear regression model, presented as coefficient (95% confidence interval) and highlighted in bold if statistical significance is achieved (P<0.05).
ALB: triple-dose albendazole; PLB: placebo.
Effects of de-worming on changes in nutritional indicators (secondary outcomes) at various follow-ups from baseline among 194 children from south-west Yunnan province, P.R. China, who participated in the randomized controlled trial conducted from October 2011 to May 2012.
| 1-month follow-up | 4-month follow-up | 6-month follow-up | |||||||
| Characteristics | ALB (n = 99) | PLB (n = 95) | Differences in Δ from baseline | ALB (n = 99) | PLB (n = 95) | Differences in Δ from baseline | ALB (n = 99) | PLB (n = 95) | Differences in Δ from baseline |
| Body height [cm] | n.d. | 130.3 (2.9) | 129.0 (2.7) | 0.2 (−0.1 to 0.4) | 130.9 (3.5) | 129.6 (3.3) | 0.2 (−0.1 to 0.4) | ||
| Body weight [kg] | 27.6 (1.4) | 27.0 (1.2) | 0.2 (−0.1 to 0.4) | 28.4 (2.2) | 27.7 (1.9) | 0.2 (−0.1 to 0.6) | |||
| Stunted (%) | n.d. | 63 (−10.1%) | 70 (−6.3%) | n.a. | 66 (−7.0%) | 69 (−7.4%) | n.a. | ||
| Sum of skinfolds [mm] | 12 (1) | 12 (1) | 0 (0 to 1) | 12 (1) | 12 (1) | 0 (0 to 1) | |||
| Hemoglobin level [g l−1] | 151 (−10) | 150 (−7) | −2 (−10 to 7) | 164 (3) | 159 (2) | 3 (−8 to 13) | 148 (−13) | 148 (−9) | −3 (−11 to 6) |
Values are number of children (% change from baseline) or mean (Δ from baseline), unless otherwise stated.
Differences in the changes between follow-up and baseline among the intervention groups are adjusted for village, and at the individual level for sex and age at follow-up. Values are calculated from a multivariate linear regression model, presented as coefficient (95% confidence interval) and highlighted in bold if statistical significance is achieved (P<0.05). For percentage stunted, the χ2 test is used and thus, no 95% confidence interval is presented.
Stunting is defined as ≤−2 HAZ score.
P-value calculated from χ2 test comparing % stunted between ALB and PLB for statistical significance.
ALB: triple-dose albendazole; PLB: placebo; n.d.: not determined.
Effects of soil-transmitted helminth infection status on changes in physical fitness and strength indicators (primary outcomes) at various follow-ups from baseline among 194 children from south-west Yunnan province, P.R. China, who participated in the randomized controlled trial conducted from October 2011 to May 2012.
| 1-month follow-up | 4-month follow-up | 6-month follow-up | ||||
| Multivariate linear regression models | n | Coefficient (95% CI) | n | Coefficient (95% CI) | n | Coefficient (95% CI) |
|
| ||||||
|
| 97 | −0.1 (−1.2 to 1.0) | 167 | 0.7 (−0.8 to 2.2) | 175 | 1.2 (−0.4 to 2.8) |
|
| 166 |
| 170 | −1.5 (−3.1 to 0.1) | 175 | 0.5 (−1.1 to 2.1) |
| Hookworm-infected | 59 | −0.2 (−1.5 to 1.0) | 51 | 0.4 (−0.8 to 1.6) | 56 |
|
|
| ||||||
|
| 97 | −0.2 (−3.7 to 3.4) | 167 | 3.1 (−1.4 to 7.5) | 175 | 3.4 (−1.7 to 8.5) |
|
| 166 |
| 170 |
| 175 | 1.2 (−3.9 to 6.3) |
| Hookworm-infected | 59 | −0.1 (−4.1 to 3.9) | 51 | 2.0 (−1.5 to 5.5) | 56 | −2.2 (−5.5 to 1.1) |
|
| ||||||
|
| 97 |
| 167 | −0.5 (−1.5 to 0.5) | 175 | −1.2 (−2.4 to 0.1) |
|
| 166 | 0.0 (−0.9 to 0.8) | 170 | 0.9 (−0.1 to 2.0) | 175 | 0.7 (−0.6 to 2.0) |
| Hookworm-infected | 59 |
| 51 | 0.1 (−0.7 to 0.9) | 56 | 0.7 (−0.1 to 1.5) |
|
| ||||||
|
| 97 | −2 (−6 to 2) | 167 | −2 (−7 to 3) | 175 | 1 (−4 to 7) |
|
| 166 | 5 (0 to 10) | 170 | 5 (0 to 10) | 175 | 5 (−1 to 11) |
| Hookworm-infected | 59 | 0 (−4 to 5) | 51 | −3 (−7 to 1) | 56 | 1 (−3 to 5) |
For each model, the outcome variable is highlighted with a grey bar and the explanatory variables (reference group is always not infected with the particular soil-transmitted helminth species) are presented below. All models have been adjusted for village, and at the individual level for sex, age at follow-up, and height and weight at baseline (for the 1-month follow-up) or follow-up (for the 4- and 6-month follow-ups). Values are presented as coefficient (95% confidence interval) and highlighted in bold if statistical significance is achieved (P<0.05).
Figure 2Three-dimensional visualization of changes in 20-m laps due to differences in soil-transmitted helminth infection intensities in Chinese children.
The study was carried out in south-west Yunnan province, P.R. China between October 2011 and May 2012 among 194 children aged 9–12 years. The changes in infection intensities between the 4-month follow-up and baseline for Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, and hookworm are reflected along the X-, Y-, and Z-axis, respectively. Each circle indicates the change for a particular child harboring a certain mixture of soil-transmitted helminth infection intensities. Blue circles indicate positive change, red circles indicate negative change, and white circles indicate no change. A darker shade of color indicates a greater degree of change.
Figure 3Boxplots of six infection intensity groups identified by principal component and cluster analysis.
The groups are based on infection intensities of the three soil-transmitted helminths at baseline (white), 1-month follow-up (light grey), and 4-month follow-up (dark grey), among 194 children from a randomized controlled trial conducted in south-west Yunnan province, P.R. China, from October 2011 to May 2012.
Effects of soil-transmitted helminth infection intensity on changes in physical fitness and strength indicators (primary outcomes) at various follow-ups from baseline among 194 children from south-west Yunnan province, P.R. China, who participated in a randomized controlled trial conducted from October 2011 to May 2012.
| 1-month follow-up | 4-month follow-up | 6-month follow-up | |
| Multivariate linear regression models | Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient (95% CI) | Coefficient (95% CI) |
|
| |||
| Group 2 (n = 36) | −0.2 (−1.6 to 1.2) | −0.2 (−1.7 to 1.3) | 0.7 (−0.7 to 2.1) |
| Group 3 (n = 53) | 0.3 (−0.9 to 1.5) | −0.1 (−1.4 to 1.3) | 0.1 (−1.2 to 1.4) |
| Group 4 (n = 27) | 1.2 (−0.3 to 2.7) | 0.2 (−1.5 to 1.9) | 0.7 (−0.8 to 2.2) |
| Group 5 (n = 22) |
|
|
|
| Group 6 (n = 10) | 0.3 (−1.9 to 2.4) | 0.9 (−1.5 to 3.2) | 0.3 (−1.9 to 2.5) |
|
| |||
| Group 2 (n = 36) | −1.4 (−5.8 to 3.0) | −2.2 (−6.7 to 2.4) | 0.5 (−4.0 to 5.0) |
| Group 3 (n = 53) | −0.2 (−4.1 to 3.8) | −0.8 (−4.8 to 3.3) | −1.6 (−5.6 to 2.5) |
| Group 4 (n = 27) | 2.5 (−2.3 to 7.3) | 0.3 (−4.7 to 5.3) | 2.7 (−2.3 to 7.7) |
| Group 5 (n = 22) | 5.1 (0.0 to 10.3) |
| 3.9 (−1.5 to 9.2) |
| Group 6 (n = 10) | −1.7 (−8.5 to 5.1) | 1.4 (−5.6 to 8.5) | 0.3 (−6.7 to 7.3) |
|
| |||
| Group 2 (n = 36) | −0.6 (−1.5 to 0.3) | −0.7 (−1.7 to 0.3) | −1.2 (−2.4 to −0.1) |
| Group 3 (n = 53) | −0.2 (−1.1 to 0.6) | −0.1 (−1.0 to 0.8) | −0.5 (−1.5 to 0.5) |
| Group 4 (n = 27) | −0.4 (−1.4 to 0.7) | 0.3 (−0.8 to 1.4) | −0.1 (−1.4 to 1.1) |
| Group 5 (n = 22) | −0.5 (−1.6 to 0.6) | −0.8 (−1.9 to 0.4) | −0.8 (−2.2 to 0.5) |
| Group 6 (n = 10) | 0.0 (−1.5 to 1.4) | 0.0 (−1.6 to 1.5) | −0.1 (−2.3 to 1.2) |
|
| |||
| Group 2 (n = 36) | −1 (−6 to 4) | 1 (−4 to 6) | −2 (−7 to 3) |
| Group 3 (n = 53) | 1 (−4 to 5) | 3 (−1 to 7) | −1 (−5 to 4) |
| Group 4 (n = 27) | 4 (−2 to 9) |
| 0 (−5 to 6) |
| Group 5 (n = 22) | −3 (−9 to 3) | −1 (−7 to 4) | −5 (−11 to 1) |
| Group 6 (n = 10) | −3 (−11 to 5) | 1 (−7 to 9) | 1 (−7 to 9) |
For each model, the outcome variable is highlighted with a grey bar and the explanatory variables (reference group is always group 1) are presented below. All models have been adjusted for village, and at the individual level for sex, age at follow-up, and height and weight at baseline (for the 1-month follow-up) or follow-up (for the 4-month follow-up). Values are presented as coefficient (95% confidence interval) and highlighted in bold if statistical significance is achieved (P<0.05).