| Literature DB >> 25009977 |
Sean R Maloney1, David Almarines2, Paula Goolkasian3.
Abstract
Some recent studies have proposed an important role for vitamin D in reducing the risk of infection by assisting in the suppression of viruses and by controlling the inflammatory response. A low vitamin D state may have a detrimental effect on the immune system's ability to produce activated CD8+ T cells, and it may increase the inflammatory reaction to Epstein Barr virus. The aim of this chart review was to see if serum 25 OH vitamin D3 levels in service members with acute pharyngitis were lower in those who had positive rather than negative monospot tests. A retrospective chart review was conducted on the medical records of service members who presented to sick call at Camp Lejeune, NC with acute pharyngitis from October 8, 2010 until June 30, 2011. Serum 25 OH vitamin D3 levels were compared between those with positive and negative monospot test results. Of the 25 records that were reviewed, there were 9 (36%) service members with positive results, and they were found to have lower vitamin D levels (Median = 20.80 ng/ml, Interquartile range = 10.15) than those with negative test results (Median = 30.35 ng/ml, Interquartile range = 17.05), Mann-Whitney U = 41, p = .039. Only 1 of the 9 with positive test results had a normal serum 25 OH vitamin D3 level (30 ng/ml or greater) compared with 9 of the 16 with negative test results. Optimal vitamin D stores may play a significant role in reducing the risk of developing acute mononucleosis but larger, prospective studies will be needed to verify these findings.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25009977 PMCID: PMC4091874 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
A comparison of group data for those with positive and negative monospot test results.
| Negative Group | Positive Group | Statistical test |
| |
| Sample Size | 16 | 9 | ||
| # of females | 3 | 4 | ||
| # of males | 13 | 5 | Chi Square (1) = 1.86 | .17 |
| Vitamin D Data | ||||
| Median | 30.35 ng/ml | 20.80 ng/ml | Mann-Whitney U = 41 | .039 |
| IQR | 17.05 | 10.15 | ||
| Skewedness | .52 | 1.58 | ||
| STDerror | .56 | .72 | ||
| Kurtosis | 1.36 | 3.05 | ||
| STD error | 1.09 | 1.40 | ||
| Age | ||||
| Median | 31 years | 25 years | Mann-Whitney U = 42.5 | .094 |
| IQR | 10.5 | 8.50 | ||
| Skewedness | .39 | 1.29 | ||
| STDerror | .56 | .72 | ||
| Kurtosis | .07 | .66 | ||
| STD error | 1.09 | 1.40 |
one-tailed test.
IQR = Interquartile Range.
STD error = Standard error.
two-tailed test.
Figure 1Boxplots comparing Serum 25 OH vitamin D3 levels (upper panel) and age (lower panel) between those with acute pharyngitis who test positive and negative on the monospot test.
Initial Serum 25 OH Vitamin D3 Levels (ng/ml) Drawn from each Service Member and Tabulated by Month of Presentation with Acute Pharyngitis.
| Group | Oct. | Nov. | Dec. | Jan. | Feb. | March | April | May | June |
| PositiveMonospot | 12.914.120.8 | 21.2 | 27.0 | 16.018.023.4 | 41.0 | ||||
| NegativeMonospot | 19.659.1 | 28.931.2 | 29.030.7 | 25.038.0 | 14.038.0 | 15.030.031.0 | 10.039.0 | 38.0 |
(The number of entries in each cell signifies the number of monospot tests drawn during that month).
Serum 25 OH Vitamin D3 Levels (ng/ml – lowest to highest) and Monospot Test Results.
| 25 OH Vit. D3 Level | Date VitD drawn | Monospot Test | Date Monospot drawn | Lab Used | Age/Years | Sex |
| 10.0 | 6 Apr ‘11 | NEG | 5 Apr ‘11 | Quest | 34 | M |
| 12.9 | 21 Oct ‘10 | POS | 21 Oct ‘10 | Lab Corp. | 36 | F |
| 14.0 | 17 Feb ‘11 | NEG | 17 Feb ‘11 | Quest | 29 | M |
| 14.1 | 18 Oct ‘10 | POS | 18 Oct ‘10 | Lab Corp. | 23 | M |
| 15.0 | 17 Mar ‘11 | NEG | 17 Mar ‘11 | Quest | 20 | M |
| 16.0 | 15 Feb ‘11 | POS | 15 Feb ‘11 | Quest | 40 | M |
| 18.0 | 11 Feb ‘11 | POS | 11 Feb ‘11 | Quest | 24 | F |
| 19.6 | 18 Oct ‘10 | NEG | 13 Oct ’10 | Lab Corp. | 32 | M |
| 20.8 | 07 Sep ‘10 | POS | 8 Oct ‘10 | Lab Corp. | 24 | F |
| 21.2 | 10 Dec ‘10 | POS | 8 Dec ‘10 | Lab Corp. | 21 | F |
| 23.4 | 14 Oct ‘10 | POS | 2 Feb ‘11 | Lab Corp. | 25 | M |
| 25.0 | 21 Jan ‘11 | NEG | 21 Jan ‘11 | Lab Corp. | 38 | M |
| 27.0 | 31 Jan ‘11 | POS | 26 Jan ‘11 | Quest | 28 | M |
| 28.9 | 7 Jan ‘11 | NEG | 3 Nov ‘10 | Lab Corp. | 40 | M |
| 29.0 | 20 Dec ‘10 | NEG | 14 Dec ‘10 | Lab Corp. | 47 | M |
| 30.0 | 25 Mar ‘11 | NEG | 25 Mar ‘11 | Quest | 24 | M |
| 30.7 | 14 Dec ‘10 | NEG | 14 Dec ‘10 | Lab Corp. | 37 | M |
| 31.0 | 14 Mar ‘11 | NEG | 14 Mar ‘11 | Quest | 38 | M |
| 31.2 | 2 Nov ‘10 | NEG | 2 Nov ‘10 | Lab Corp. | 28 | M |
| 38.0 | 19 May ‘11 | NEG | 15 Feb ‘11 | Quest | 24 | M |
| 38.0 | 10 May ‘11 | NEG | 5 May ‘11 | Quest | 27 | F |
| 38.0 | 20 Jan ’11 | NEG | 20 Jan ‘11 | Lab Corp. | 30 | F |
| 39.0 | 27 Apr ‘11 | NEG | 27 Apr ‘11 | Quest | 29 | M |
| 41.0 | 6 Jul ‘11 | POS | 30 Jun ‘11 | Quest | 27 | M |
| 59.1 | 4 Oct ‘10 | NEG | 4 Oct ‘10 | Lab Corp. | 33 | F |