Literature DB >> 25008413

Prestimulation phase predicts the TMS-evoked response.

Bornali Kundu1, Jeffrey S Johnson2, Bradley R Postle3.   

Abstract

Prestimulation oscillatory phase and power in particular frequency bands predict perception of at-threshold visual stimuli and of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced phosphenes. These effects may be due to changes in cortical excitability, such that certain ranges of power and/or phase values result in a state in which a particular brain area is more receptive to input, thereby biasing behavior. However, the effects of trial-by-trial fluctuations in phase and power of ongoing oscillations on the brain's electrical response to TMS itself have thus far not been addressed. The present study adopts a combined TMS and electroencepalography (EEG) approach to determine whether the TMS-evoked response is sensitive to momentary fluctuations in prestimulation phase and/or power in different frequency bands. Specifically, TMS was applied to superior parietal lobule while subjects performed a short-term memory task. Results showed that the prestimulation phase, particularly within the beta (15-25 Hz) band, predicted pulse-by-pulse variations in the global mean field amplitude. No such relationship was observed between prestimulation power and the global mean field amplitude. Furthermore, TMS-evoked power in the beta band fluctuated with prestimulation phase in the beta band in a manner that differed from spontaneous brain activity. These effects were observed in areas at and distal to the stimulation site. Together, these results confirm the idea that fluctuating phase of ongoing neuronal oscillations create "windows of excitability" in the brain, and they give insight into how TMS interacts with ongoing brain activity on a pulse-by-pulse basis.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  electroencephalography; excitability; phase; power; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25008413      PMCID: PMC4200008          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00390.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  34 in total

1.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation.

Authors:  T P Jung; S Makeig; C Humphries; T W Lee; M J McKeown; V Iragui; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  EEG-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals rapid shifts in motor cortical excitability during the human sleep slow oscillation.

Authors:  Til O Bergmann; Matthias Mölle; Marlit A Schmidt; Christoph Lindner; Lisa Marshall; Jan Born; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Task-dependent changes in cortical excitability and effective connectivity: a combined TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Bornali Kundu; Adenauer G Casali; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stimulation on the positive phase of hippocampal theta rhythm induces long-term potentiation that can Be depotentiated by stimulation on the negative phase in area CA1 in vivo.

Authors:  C Hölscher; R Anwyl; M J Rowan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

6.  Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Delpuech; J Pernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Prestimulus oscillatory activity in the alpha band predicts visual discrimination ability.

Authors:  Hanneke van Dijk; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Robert Oostenveld; Ole Jensen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Ali Mazaheri
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas.

Authors:  Vincenzo Romei; Verena Brodbeck; Christoph Michel; Amir Amedi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Serial, covert shifts of attention during visual search are reflected by the frontal eye fields and correlated with population oscillations.

Authors:  Timothy J Buschman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  12 in total

1.  Distinct Oscillatory Frequencies Underlie Excitability of Human Occipital and Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Jason Samaha; Olivia Gosseries; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Daily prefrontal closed-loop repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) produces progressive EEG quasi-alpha phase entrainment in depressed adults.

Authors:  Josef Faller; Jayce Doose; Xiaoxiao Sun; James R Mclntosh; Golbarg T Saber; Yida Lin; Joshua B Teves; Aidan Blankenship; Sarah Huffman; Robin I Goldman; Mark S George; Truman R Brown; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  The Problem and Potential of TMS' Infinite Parameter Space: A Targeted Review and Road Map Forward.

Authors:  Kevin A Caulfield; Joshua C Brown
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.435

4.  PreSMA stimulation changes task-free functional connectivity in the fronto-basal-ganglia that correlates with response inhibition efficiency.

Authors:  Benjamin Xu; Marco Sandrini; Wen-Tung Wang; Jason F Smith; Joelle E Sarlls; Oluwole Awosika; John A Butman; Barry Horwitz; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  A state space modeling approach to real-time phase estimation.

Authors:  Anirudh Wodeyar; Mark Schatza; Alik S Widge; Uri T Eden; Mark A Kramer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Pre-stimulus Alpha Oscillations and Inter-subject Variability of Motor Evoked Potentials in Single- and Paired-Pulse TMS Paradigms.

Authors:  Zafer Iscan; Maria Nazarova; Tommaso Fedele; Evgeny Blagovechtchenski; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Characterizing and Modulating Brain Circuitry through Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Electroencephalography.

Authors:  Faranak Farzan; Marine Vernet; Mouhsin M D Shafi; Alexander Rotenberg; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Theta Rhythmic Neuronal Activity and Reaction Times Arising from Cortical Receptive Field Interactions during Distributed Attention.

Authors:  Ricardo Kienitz; Joscha T Schmiedt; Katharine A Shapcott; Kleopatra Kouroupaki; Richard C Saunders; Michael Christoph Schmid
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Valerio Raco; Robert Bauer; Srikandarajah Tharsan; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  Phase-Dependent Modulation of Signal Transmission in Cortical Networks through tACS-Induced Neural Oscillations.

Authors:  Kristoffer D Fehér; Masahito Nakataki; Yosuke Morishima
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.