Literature DB >> 2500781

Cost-effective diagnostic test sequencing.

B Eiseman, R Jones, M McClatchey, B Borlase.   

Abstract

Proper diagnostic test selection and logical sequencing can minimize cost without compromising care. This study analyzes the logic for sequencing tests either in series (one after another) or in parallel (simultaneously). A model is created using 2 diagnostic tests for 2 diseases. Tests are assumed to have perfect performance characteristics. Factors involved in cost-effective test sequencing include cost of each test, test performance characteristics, per diem hospital charge, and the clinician's prior probability of the suspected diagnosis based on history, physical examination, and previous laboratory data. At a given point of clinical suspicion, cost-effective sequencing strategy should shift. In general, a cheap test can effectively be used in parallel even at low diagnostic probabilities; an expensive test should, in general, be used in series only when there is a high prior probability of diagnosis. High per diem hospitalization costs--such as for a patient in the intensive care unit--favor in parallel testing. Clinical acumen and suspicion of diagnosis (prior probability) primarily direct cost-effective diagnostic test sequencing. Decision analysis of diagnostic test sequencing represents a technique for making cost-effective decisions for sequencing and, thereby, minimizing costs while achieving optimal patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2500781     DOI: 10.1007/bf01659033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  6 in total

1.  Inpatient management protocols to reduce health care costs.

Authors:  T Wachtel; A W Moulton; J Pezzullo; M Hamolsky
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1986 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Multiple test analyzer (MTA): a microcomputer program for determining preferred strategies with two diagnostic tests.

Authors:  J C Hershey; R A Greene; R D Cebul; S V Williams
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1986 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Clinical guidelines for using two dichotomous tests.

Authors:  J C Hershey; R D Cebul; S V Williams
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1986 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Stochastic thresholds.

Authors:  A Hartz; W P McKinney; R Centor; A Krieg; G Simms; S Henck
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1986 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Cost containment and changing physicians' practice behavior. Can the fox learn to guard the chicken coop?

Authors:  J M Eisenberg; S V Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The threshold approach to clinical decision making.

Authors:  S G Pauker; J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.