Literature DB >> 25006207

Preimplantation genetic screening: back to the future.

Sebastiaan Mastenbroek1, Sjoerd Repping2.   

Abstract

All agree that in hindsight the rapid adoption of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) using cleavage stage biopsy and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in routine clinical practice without proper evaluation of (cost-)effectiveness basically resulted in couples paying more money for a less effective treatment. Now, almost 20 years later, we are on the verge of a new era of PGS. But have things really changed or are we simply going back to the future?
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF/ICSI; PGS; aneuploidy; efficacy; randomized controlled trials

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25006207     DOI： 10.1093/humrep/deu163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN： 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  30 in total

1.  Trends, fads and ART!

Authors:  Brian Dale; Yves Menezo; Gianfranco Coppola
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Complex chromosomal rearrangement-a lesson learned from PGS.

Authors:  Tsvia Frumkin; Sagit Peleg; Veronica Gold; Adi Reches; Shiri Asaf; Foad Azem; Dalit Ben-Yosef; Mira Malcov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Are computational applications the "crystal ball" in the IVF laboratory? The evolution from mathematics to artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Nikolaos Antoniou; Anna Rapani; George Anifandis; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The cost of a euploid embryo identified from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a counseling tool.

Authors:  Randi H Goldman; Catherine Racowsky; Leslie V Farland; Janis H Fox; Santiago Munné; Lia Ribustello; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Preimplantation genetic screening 2.0: the theory.

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; Karen Sermon
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Should preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) be implemented to routine IVF practice?

Authors:  Raoul Orvieto; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of morphologically grade CC blastocysts: are they of clinical value?

Authors:  Menghui Li; Mingru Yin; Ling Wu; Zhiguang Yan; Qifeng Lyu; Zheng Yan; Bin Li
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  The impact of patient preselection on reported IVF outcomes.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Reanalysis of human blastocysts with different molecular genetic screening platforms reveals significant discordance in ploidy status.

Authors:  Drew V Tortoriello; Molina Dayal; Zeki Beyhan; Tahsin Yakut; Levent Keskintepe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; Antonio Capalbo; Jacques Cohen; Edith Coonen; Martine De Rycke; Anick De Vos; Joy Delhanty; Francesco Fiorentino; Norbert Gleicher; Georg Griesinger; Jamie Grifo; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Georgia Kokkali; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; David Meldrum; Marcos Meseguer; Markus Montag; Santiago Munné; Laura Rienzi; Carmen Rubio; Katherine Scott; Richard Scott; Carlos Simon; Jason Swain; Nathan Treff; Filippo Ubaldi; Rita Vassena; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Willem Verpoest; Dagan Wells; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.