J Kahlhöfer1, M Lagerpusch2, J Enderle2, B Eggeling2, W Braun2, D Pape3, M J Müller2, A Bosy-Westphal4. 1. Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany. 2. Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. 3. InsuLean GmbH & Co. KG, Essen, Germany. 4. 1] Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany [2] Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Because both, glycemic index (GI) and carbohydrate content of the diet increase insulin levels and could thus impair fat oxidation, we hypothesized that refeeding a low GI, moderate-carbohydrate diet facilitates weight maintenance. SUBJECTS/ METHODS:Healthy men (n=32, age 26.0±3.9 years; BMI 23.4±2.0 kg/m(2)) followed 1 week of controlled overfeeding, 3 weeks of caloric restriction and 2 weeks of hypercaloric refeeding (+50, -50 and +50% energy requirement) with low vs high GI (41 vs 74) and moderate vs high CHO intake (50% vs 65% energy). We measured adaptation of fasting macronutrient oxidation and the capacity to supress fat oxidation during an oral glucose tolerance test. Changes in fat mass were measured by quantitative magnetic resonance. RESULTS: During overfeeding, participants gained 1.9±1.2 kg body weight, followed by a weight loss of -6.3±0.6 kg and weight regain of 2.8±1.0 kg. Subjects with 65% CHO gained more body weight compared with 50% CHO diet (P<0.05) particularly with HGI meals (P<0.01). Refeeding a high-GI diet led to an impaired basal fat oxidation when compared with a low-GI diet (P<0.02), especially at 65% CHO intake. Postprandial metabolic flexibility was unaffected by refeeding at 50% CHO but clearly impaired by 65% CHO diet (P<0.05). Impairment in fasting fat oxidation was associated with regain in fat mass (r=0.43, P<0.05) and body weight (r=0.35; P=0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Both higher GI and higher carbohydrate content affect substrate oxidation and thus the regain in body weight in healthy men. These results argue in favor of a lower glycemic load diet for weight maintenance after weight loss.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Because both, glycemic index (GI) and carbohydrate content of the diet increase insulin levels and could thus impair fat oxidation, we hypothesized that refeeding a low GI, moderate-carbohydrate diet facilitates weight maintenance. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Healthy men (n=32, age 26.0±3.9 years; BMI 23.4±2.0 kg/m(2)) followed 1 week of controlled overfeeding, 3 weeks of caloric restriction and 2 weeks of hypercaloric refeeding (+50, -50 and +50% energy requirement) with low vs high GI (41 vs 74) and moderate vs high CHO intake (50% vs 65% energy). We measured adaptation of fasting macronutrient oxidation and the capacity to supress fat oxidation during an oral glucose tolerance test. Changes in fat mass were measured by quantitative magnetic resonance. RESULTS: During overfeeding, participants gained 1.9±1.2 kg body weight, followed by a weight loss of -6.3±0.6 kg and weight regain of 2.8±1.0 kg. Subjects with 65% CHO gained more body weight compared with 50% CHO diet (P<0.05) particularly with HGI meals (P<0.01). Refeeding a high-GI diet led to an impaired basal fat oxidation when compared with a low-GI diet (P<0.02), especially at 65% CHO intake. Postprandial metabolic flexibility was unaffected by refeeding at 50% CHO but clearly impaired by 65% CHO diet (P<0.05). Impairment in fasting fat oxidation was associated with regain in fat mass (r=0.43, P<0.05) and body weight (r=0.35; P=0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Both higher GI and higher carbohydrate content affect substrate oxidation and thus the regain in body weight in healthy men. These results argue in favor of a lower glycemic load diet for weight maintenance after weight loss.
Authors: G Lattuada; F Costantino; A Caumo; P Scifo; F Ragogna; F De Cobelli; A Del Maschio; L Luzi; G Perseghin Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Amy M Goss; Laura Lee Goree; Amy C Ellis; Paula C Chandler-Laney; Krista Casazza; Mark E Lockhart; Barbara A Gower Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: W G Abbott; B V Howard; L Christin; D Freymond; S Lillioja; V L Boyce; T E Anderson; C Bogardus; E Ravussin Journal: Am J Physiol Date: 1988-09
Authors: Barbara A Gower; Gary R Hunter; Paula C Chandler-Laney; Jessica A Alvarez; Nikki C Bush Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Katie R Hirsch; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Malia N M Blue; Meredith G Mock; Eric T Trexler; Kristin S Ondrak Journal: Phys Sportsmed Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.241
Authors: Eric T Trexler; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Hailee L Wingfield; Malia N Blue; Erica J Roelofs; Katie R Hirsch Journal: J Sports Med Phys Fitness Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 1.637
Authors: Constanze Christin Maresch; Sebastian Friedrich Petry; Stephan Theis; Anja Bosy-Westphal; Thomas Linn Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Anny Mulya; Jacob M Haus; Thomas P J Solomon; Karen R Kelly; Steven K Malin; Michael Rocco; Hope Barkoukis; John P Kirwan Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Erin D Giles; Jennifer Hagman; Zhaoxing Pan; Paul S MacLean; Janine A Higgins Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 4.169