OBJECTIVE: Qualitative aspects of diet may affect body composition and propensity for weight gain or loss. We tested the hypothesis that consumption of a relatively low glycemic load (GL) diet would reduce total and visceral adipose tissue under both eucaloric and hypocaloric conditions. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were 69 healthy overweight men and women. Body composition was assessed by DXA and fat distribution by CT scan at baseline, after 8 weeks of a eucaloric diet intervention, and after 8 weeks of a hypocaloric (1000 kcal/day deficit) diet intervention. Participants were provided all food for both phases, and randomized to either a low GL diet (<45 points per 1000 kcal; n = 40) or high GL diet (>75 points per 1000 kcal, n = 29). RESULTS: After the eucaloric phase, participants who consumed the low GL diet had 11% less intra-abdominal fat (IAAT) than those who consumed the high GL diet (P < 0.05, adjusted for total fat mass and baseline IAAT). Participants lost an average of 5.8 kg during the hypocaloric phase, with no differences in the amount of weight loss with diet assignment (P = 0.39). Following weight loss, participants who consumed the low GL diet had 4.4% less total fat mass than those who consumed the high GL diet (P < 0.05, adjusted for lean mass and baseline fat mass). CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of a relatively low GL diet may affect energy partitioning, both inducing reduction in IAAT independent of weight change, and enhancing loss of fat relative to lean mass during weight loss.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Qualitative aspects of diet may affect body composition and propensity for weight gain or loss. We tested the hypothesis that consumption of a relatively low glycemic load (GL) diet would reduce total and visceral adipose tissue under both eucaloric and hypocaloric conditions. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were 69 healthy overweight men and women. Body composition was assessed by DXA and fat distribution by CT scan at baseline, after 8 weeks of a eucaloric diet intervention, and after 8 weeks of a hypocaloric (1000 kcal/day deficit) diet intervention. Participants were provided all food for both phases, and randomized to either a low GL diet (<45 points per 1000 kcal; n = 40) or high GL diet (>75 points per 1000 kcal, n = 29). RESULTS: After the eucaloric phase, participants who consumed the low GL diet had 11% less intra-abdominal fat (IAAT) than those who consumed the high GL diet (P < 0.05, adjusted for total fat mass and baseline IAAT). Participants lost an average of 5.8 kg during the hypocaloric phase, with no differences in the amount of weight loss with diet assignment (P = 0.39). Following weight loss, participants who consumed the low GL diet had 4.4% less total fat mass than those who consumed the high GL diet (P < 0.05, adjusted for lean mass and baseline fat mass). CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of a relatively low GL diet may affect energy partitioning, both inducing reduction in IAAT independent of weight change, and enhancing loss of fat relative to lean mass during weight loss.
Authors: F Scazzina; D Del Rio; L Benini; C Melegari; N Pellegrini; E Marcazzan; F Brighenti Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Jytte Halkjaer; Anne Tjønneland; Birthe L Thomsen; Kim Overvad; Thorkild I A Sørensen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jytte Halkjaer; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Anne Tjønneland; Per Togo; Claus Holst; Berit L Heitmann Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: F Isken; S Klaus; K J Petzke; C Loddenkemper; A F H Pfeiffer; M O Weickert Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Dora Romaguera; Lars Angquist; Huaidong Du; Marianne Uhre Jakobsen; Nita G Forouhi; Jytte Halkjaer; Edith J M Feskens; Daphne L van der A; Giovanna Masala; Annika Steffen; Domenico Palli; Nicholas J Wareham; Kim Overvad; Anne Tjønneland; Heiner Boeing; Elio Riboli; Thorkild I A Sørensen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M S Bray; J-Y Tsai; C Villegas-Montoya; B B Boland; Z Blasier; O Egbejimi; M Kueht; M E Young Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: James E N Minchin; Catherine M Scahill; Nicole Staudt; Elisabeth M Busch-Nentwich; John F Rawls Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Margaux J Barnes; Mary K Lynch; Molly D Lisenby; Traci Jester; Jeanine Maclin; Taylor Knight; Gordon Fisher; Barbara Gower Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Amy M Goss; Paula C Chandler-Laney; Fernando Ovalle; Laura Lee Goree; Ricardo Azziz; Renee A Desmond; G Wright Bates; Barbara A Gower Journal: Metabolism Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Paula C Chandler-Laney; Shannon A Morrison; Laura Lee T Goree; Amy C Ellis; Krista Casazza; Renee Desmond; Barbara A Gower Journal: Appetite Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: T Ruiz-Lozano; J Vidal; A de Hollanda; M Canteras; M Garaulet; M Izquierdo-Pulido Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: J Kahlhöfer; M Lagerpusch; J Enderle; B Eggeling; W Braun; D Pape; M J Müller; A Bosy-Westphal Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 4.016