BACKGROUND: Guidelines for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) traditionally recommend a fixed tracer dose. Yet, clinical practice shows degraded image quality in heavier patients. The aim was to optimize and validate the tracer dose and scan time to obtain a constant image quality less dependent on patients' physical characteristics. METHODS:125 patients underwentCadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT)-SPECT stress MPI using a fixed Tc-99m-tetrofosmin tracer dose. Image quality was scored by three physicians on a 4-point grading scale and related to the number of photon counts normalized to tracer dose and scan time. Counts were correlated with various patient-specific parameters dealing with patient size and weight to find the best predicting parameter. From these data, a formula to provide constant image quality was derived, and subsequently tested in 92 new patients. RESULTS:Degradation in image quality and photon counts was observed for heavier patients for all patients' specific parameters (P < .01). We found body weight to be the best-predicting parameter for image quality and derived a new dose formula. After applying this new body weight-depended tracer dose and scan time in a new group, image quality was found to be constant (P > .19) in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Also in CZT SPECT image quality decreases with weight. The use of a tracer dose and scan time that depends linearly on patient's body weight corrected for the varying image quality in CZT-SPECT MPI. This leads to better radiation exposure justification.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) traditionally recommend a fixed tracer dose. Yet, clinical practice shows degraded image quality in heavier patients. The aim was to optimize and validate the tracer dose and scan time to obtain a constant image quality less dependent on patients' physical characteristics. METHODS: 125 patients underwent Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT)-SPECT stress MPI using a fixed Tc-99m-tetrofosmin tracer dose. Image quality was scored by three physicians on a 4-point grading scale and related to the number of photon counts normalized to tracer dose and scan time. Counts were correlated with various patient-specific parameters dealing with patient size and weight to find the best predicting parameter. From these data, a formula to provide constant image quality was derived, and subsequently tested in 92 new patients. RESULTS: Degradation in image quality and photon counts was observed for heavier patients for all patients' specific parameters (P < .01). We found body weight to be the best-predicting parameter for image quality and derived a new dose formula. After applying this new body weight-depended tracer dose and scan time in a new group, image quality was found to be constant (P > .19) in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Also in CZT SPECT image quality decreases with weight. The use of a tracer dose and scan time that depends linearly on patient's body weight corrected for the varying image quality in CZT-SPECT MPI. This leads to better radiation exposure justification.
Authors: Gary V Heller; Jonathan Links; Timothy M Bateman; Jack A Ziffer; Edward Ficaro; Mylan C Cohen; Robert C Hendel Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: W Lane Duvall; Lori B Croft; Tapan Godiwala; Eric Ginsberg; Titus George; Milena J Henzlova Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Albert Flotats; Juhani Knuuti; Matthias Gutberlet; Claudio Marcassa; Frank M Bengel; Philippe A Kaufmann; Michael R Rees; Birger Hesse Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S R Underwood; C Anagnostopoulos; M Cerqueira; P J Ell; E J Flint; M Harbinson; A D Kelion; A Al-Mohammad; E M Prvulovich; L J Shaw; A C Tweddel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Shu Yokota; Mohamed Mouden; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Elsemiek Engbers; Siert Knollema; Jorik R Timmer; Pieter L Jager Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: J D van Dijk; P L Jager; J P Ottervanger; J de Boer; A H J Oostdijk; E M Engbers; C H Slump; S Knollema; J A van Dalen Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 5.952