Literature DB >> 25004488

A comparison between conventional and collapse-mode capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers in 10-MHz 1-D arrays.

Kwan Kyu Park, Omer Oralkan, Butrus T Khuri-Yakub.   

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive comparison between a collapse-mode and a conventional-mode capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT); both devices have a 1-μm-thick silicon plate and operate at 10 MHz when biased at 100 V. The radii of the circular plates and the gap heights are modified to meet the design specifications required for a fair comparison. Finite element analysis (FEA) shows that the collapse-mode CMUT has higher output pressure sensitivity (46.5 kPa/V) than the conventional CMUT (13.1 kPa/V), and achieves a 3-dB fractional bandwidth (FBW) of 124% compared with 128% for the conventional mode. These results were validated by experiments performed on devices fabricated in a 1-D phased array configuration using the local oxidation of silicon (LOCOS)/wafer-bonding process. The measured output pressure sensitivity and the FBW of the collapse-mode and the conventional CMUTs at 100 V were 26.4 kPa/V and 103% and 12.7 kPa/V and 111%, respectively. The maximum output pressure of the collapse-mode CMUT was 1.19 MPa at 10 MHz, which was much higher than the conventional CMUT (0.44 MPa). However, the second harmonic distortion (SHD) level of the collapse-mode CMUT is higher than the conventional CMUT at the same excitation condition. Even with higher electric field in the cavity, the collapse-mode CMUT was as stable as the conventional CMUT in a long-term test. A 30-h test with a total of 3.2 × 10(9) cycles of 30 V ac excitation resulted in no significant degradation in the performance of the collapse-mode devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 25004488     DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  9 in total

1.  CMUTs with high-K atomic layer deposition dielectric material insulation layer.

Authors:  Toby Xu; Coskun Tekes; F Degertekin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Outperforming piezoelectric ultrasonics with high-reliability single-membrane CMUT array elements.

Authors:  Eric B Dew; Afshin Kashani Ilkhechi; Mohammad Maadi; Nathaniel J M Haven; Roger J Zemp
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 8.006

Review 3.  Piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducer (PMUT) arrays for integrated sensing, actuation and imaging.

Authors:  Yongqiang Qiu; James V Gigliotti; Margeaux Wallace; Flavio Griggio; Christine E M Demore; Sandy Cochran; Susan Trolier-McKinstry
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Selective Ultrasonic Gravimetric Sensors Based on Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer Structure-A Review.

Authors:  Dovydas Barauskas; Mindaugas Dzikaras; Dovydas Bieliauskas; Donatas Pelenis; Gailius Vanagas; Darius Viržonis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Advances in Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers.

Authors:  Kevin Brenner; Arif Sanli Ergun; Kamyar Firouzi; Morten Fischer Rasmussen; Quintin Stedman; Butrus Pierre Khuri-Yakub
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Improving PMUT Receive Sensitivity via DC Bias and Piezoelectric Composition.

Authors:  Christopher Cheng; Travis Peters; Ajay Dangi; Sumit Agrawal; Haoyang Chen; Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli; Susan Trolier-McKinstry
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 7.  A Review on Analytical Modeling for Collapse Mode Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer of the Collapse Voltage and the Static Membrane Deflections.

Authors:  JiuJiang Wang; Xin Liu; YuanYu Yu; Yao Li; ChingHsiang Cheng; Shuang Zhang; PengUn Mak; MangI Vai; SioHang Pun
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  High-Efficiency Output Pressure Performance Using Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers with Substrate-Embedded Springs.

Authors:  Byung Chul Lee; Amin Nikoozadeh; Kwan Kyu Park; Butrus T Khuri-Yakub
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Experimental Characterization of an Embossed Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Cell.

Authors:  Yuanyu Yu; Jiujiang Wang; Xin Liu; Sio Hang Pun; Shuang Zhang; Ching-Hsiang Cheng; Kin Fong Lei; Mang I Vai; Peng Un Mak
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.891

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.